STORYLINE Architecture, Buildings

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Designing for climate discussed in Sacramento

by Suzanne Hurt, published on January 28, 2010 at 9:28 PM

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Sacramento architecture can and should be designed for the city's climate, architect and green builder Matthew Piner said Wednesday.

With its temperate Mediterranean climate, Sacramento usually experiences hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters. Its location on two rivers in a valley between the Sierra Nevada mountains and the Pacific Ocean contributes delta breezes to cool off most summer nights, he said at a monthly architectural design forum, Design Dialogue, sponsored by the Urban Design Alliance of Sacramento.

Builders here — the same as builders throughout the world — once worked with Sacramento's natural climate to keep people comfortable when they sought shelter inside houses and other buildings. But builders moved away from such design with the inventions of conveniences such as electricity and air-conditioning.

That trend must change if Sacramento wants to reach a goal for carbon-neutral architecture by 2030 and join other Northern California cities on the cutting edge in developing clean, green technology, he said.

"We need to change the way we think — not just rely on using little boxes on roofs and pumping air around," said Piner, who owns PinerWorks Architectural & Building Group. He was guest speaker for Wednesday night's forum, "Integrating Climate + Form: A Valley City in Paradise," held at the local office for the American Institute of Architects.

Piner discussed the idea of architectural regionalism, a design approach developed for a unique place. He talked about experiments with such design and new technology and materials including photovoltaic paint and solar fiber. Piner also shared "ecofantasies" from designers in other areas, such as vertical urban farms and a phototropic skyscraper that uses biomimicry.

Climate-appropriate architecture can still be found throughout the world. Desert homes are cooled by wind towers on the Arabian Peninsula. Some Australian homes use fly roofs to provide ventilation. There are also Southeast Asian homes shaded by palm trees and raised on stilts to allow air circulation, Inuit igloos dug into the ground for warmth and earthern-wall adobe houses in Mexico.

Historic examples include the Native American cliff dwellings of Canyon de Chelly in Arizona and Mesa Verde in Colorado.

Sacramento has unique historic architecture designed for the climate before air-conditioning and even electricity existed. "High-water" Victorians and Arts and Craft bungalows were often built with basements and raised first floors that helped protect against flooding but also allowed cool air circulation underneath. High ceilings also provided circulation. Early city dwellers planted elms and other trees to shade the streets and houses, he said.

Piner presented a slide show with dozens of images, including photos of local buildings adapted to the climate and those that seem to ignore it. The state Department of General Services Resources Building, 1416 Ninth St., was one example of the latter, with an exterior that was the same on all four sides.

"This is a building I don't think gets it," Piner said. "This could be anywhere."

This city is most impacted by radiant heat. Now that most people no longer migrate with the seasons, those living here adapt to the heat first with the use of clothing. Designers and builders should take a cue from how our bodies are best heated and cooled when planning new buildings, Piner said.

"If we look at how we control the temperatures of surfaces, rather than air, we can look at different ways to build," he said. "We need to start thinking of our buildings as places for living things, rather than as mechanical boxes. I think that's how we unlock the (future of building)."

One way to do that is by orienting the building in relation to the sun to take advantage of daily and seasonal sun angles, he said.

More than 50 people attended the forum. Those in the audience included developers, neighborhood activists, preservationists, designers, builders, planners and government workers. During the discussion, one person pointed out that the dominance of mechanical solutions have allowed many people to forget why houses and other buildings were built the way they were years ago.

Others discussed ways the city will need to adapt to changing realities in the future. People will need to decide how to replace mature, dying trees that have shaded Sacramento throughout decades of summers, said Tina Suarez-Murias, a state environmental planner.

"Sacramento is known for its trees," she said.

"If we really want to look at how Sacramento as a city adapted in the past — they planted those trees for us," Piner added.

Ideas for the future include buildings with plant-shaded "green" walls, incorporating solar panels into buildings as shade canopies, roofs that allow rainwater collection, and breaking up boxy buildings with balconies, porches, rooftop gardens and more.

Obi Agha, a designer and planner who grew up in Africa, said his family and others living around them had no choice but to live in harmony with the earth. But they and other indigenous cultures are moving away from that because they are developing "Western tastes."

"They want to be like America," he said. "They want to have air-conditioning — because that shows they have arrived. They have made it. So they are losing all those things."

While many people want to have the comforts and conveniences of the West, the planet simply can't sustain such a lifestyle for the whole world, several people agreed.

"We would need seven planets for all the world to live like that," Piner said. "We may be conveniencing our way into oblivion and destroying this beautiful place."

As world leaders, the United States and other Western countries must now lead the way in designing climate-appropriate architecture and developing technology to create more energy-efficient conveniences, then export that to the world, he said.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 28, 2010 | 9:38 PM
I had hoped to go, but couldn't make it. Thanks for the excellent summary!
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 4:44 PM
Suzanne did a really great job with this, I agree.
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 8:01 AM
Thank you for including the perspective of Obi Agha. His comments are the ones that keep coming back to me, especially in combination with the idea expressed by several people that we have simply forgotten how to build in harmony with our climate. Really interesting discussion Wednesday night.
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 8:38 AM
Just what is an indigenous Sacramento expression? Florida, Arizona or Conneticut archtypes are pretty clear. I was hoping to see the roots of a valley archtype. But Victorians, for all their historic importance to Sacramento, are more an adapted fashion statement of the day than an indigenous form. It's 2010...we're at the crossroads of the Great Central Valley...what is THAT?!?
0 1
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 4:38 PM
Rich - That was the whole point of this - to ask that question with some background info to get everyone on the same page. Some of the old adobes and maybe native indian dwellings may have been appropriate to refer to as well. Victorians were the fashion of the day - but had some justifiable qualities that made them work - but also necessitated the planting of lots of trees to protect from the summer Sacto sun due to their lack of eaves and overhangs! Their problem and solution became the legacy of our great trees.
Craftsman Bungalows also worked - as does the ranch house for that matter. Part of what we discussed is that due to the temperate nature of the climate - you can literally live outdoors most all year and at least not DIE -- as you would in other parts of the country and the world. If we can't be carbon neutral (energy efficient or net-zero) here -- why not?
Architect Tyler Babcock brought up in the discussion the notion and reality of fashion -- and that architects are beholden to satisfy a client's tastes and to survive in the market to be considered current. It's true -- but in the process of addressing as a community a clean, green, modern response to our climate - a great richness and identity can emerge as a result. What we need to do is stop settling for mediocre, for the same old - same old, safe "thermostat-based" solutions. Having buildings that respond creatively and well to our climate and place -- and using locally-based materials for example -- can create a new breed of architecture we can call our own.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  January 29, 2010 | 7:29 PM
The fact that they are an "adapted fashion statement" is part of their cultural value. Western cities, lacking the pedigrees of Eastern cities, wanted to prove their ability to replicate Eastern styles as soon as possible--so cities like Sacramento made an effort to adopt Eastern styles as soon as possible, either by ordering kit houses from eastern manufacturers or adapting eastern styles. Those features were adapted to suit them to local climate. This had interesting repercussions for some cities--Dodge City, Kansas actually knocked down some of its real historic structures in an effort to replace them with "simpler" structures more like tourists would expect to see on the set of "Gunsmoke."

There are plenty of features of historic homes that are adapted to our climate, due to sheer necessity! Energy was expensive, while wood and labor were cheap. Look at the broad, prominent porches, the double-hung windows (for better ventilation) and the "sleeping porches" on the back of older Sacramento homes. Planting trees for shade, as well as for aesthetic reasons, is an element of landscape architecture that works with the houses, in the same way that Shingle or Craftsman homes are supposed to integrate the house with the landscape.

And it isn't just residential buildings--Sacramento's industrial buildings were also built to the climate. Unlike the tall, multi-story industrial buildings of the east, intended for easier heating, Sacramento's industrial buildings were broad buildings with clerestories for rapid cooling and abundant natural lighting. Examples include the Bercut-Richards cannery (now being demolished), the Libby cannery, the Del Monte cannery now used by Blue Diamond, and of course the Southern Pacific Shops buildings in the Railyards.

Exactly how historic homes worked with Sacramento's climate (and how they still can) is a rich enough subject to form its own article...I think I'll write it!
2 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 11:14 AM
That's a fascinating question that demands its own creative workshop perhaps at the Green Living Center? What is an indigenous architectural form to Sacramento? What could be?

Throughout facilitating, different pieces of the puzzle aggregated in my mind. Where is the Building Clothing industry? It can respond efficiently to fashion on the fly (ie. new decorating and design trends) and geographic need (temporary adaptations to meet the needs of seasonal weather patterns). Since Sacramento's Central City is becoming more designer-centric, what better adaptation from the human condition and biomimicry building trends that Piner addressed could burgeon in a dull Sacramento economy?

Lastly, we need the convergence of Sacramento's special place to be organized and led by UCD Business School's dean who views its educational and economic obligations to be the leadership thought and entrepreneurial mechanism to green building in the Valley as Stanford was to Silicon Valley.

That means UCD should convene a conference and ongoing experimental forum with Sacramento and SACOG's urban and suburban planners and politicians to manage an experiment in "code" that would allow architects, landscape architects, designers, developers, property managers and owners to experiment with roof use and design as well as living walls and other adaptations for sun orientation.

If California and Sacramento intend on being green, they need a playground in which to experiment that cannot be waiting for future development; we must capitalize on what Dustin Littrell and Ed Chandler commented was the opportunity for greening the existing building inventory quickly, efficiently, and creatively.
2 1
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 7:23 PM
Brian, I would be mighty darn happy to talk about the history of Sacramento's architecture at such a future forum--and its architects. Contact me offline.
1 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 1:22 AM
Brian brings up several important points from the presentation, including the "clothing for buildings" concept introduced. It is already been addressed in an international competition, kind of like the "X' prize for space travel. I've been trying to get information on it, but hard to find so far -- but the retrofit concept of a building wrap is coming! It could be what is called the "10XE Competition" that Amory Lovins is involved with, or maybe not...
I have a lot of ideas I'd like to try out. The goal would be to keep the cost of the retrofit wrap into line with the cost of the energy to provide comfort, thereby justifying the investment. I think it can work for both heating and cooling. Don't want to give much more away than that!
I really like the idea of a competition to stimulate and engage the design community. Architects, Engineers and Designers around the world are working on this aspect of how to make buiidings that both harmonize with the environment and that are energy neutral, or positive (net generators). One of the slides I found was of a project called "Symbiotic City" -- where futuristic high tech structures in the midst of an existing legacy city fed energy and helped to direct either excess heat and waste processed as nutrients back into an underground "root system" that could help support the city. Like a "central plant" concept, but also distributed -- and I could see also being miniaturized. Hydrogen fuel cells, methane digestion, sewage = nutrients, not waste and all water continually filtered and recycled, finally to the plants and the soil within the city. Sewage treatment is a "waste" of water! This is what Bill McDonough is talking about in his approach and what he calls the "Next Industrial Revolution" -- and what I believe that Steve Curall, Dean at UCD School of Management is getting at in reference to his vision for the Sacramento and Valley region. Many have had versions of the vision -- now we need to act on it.
1 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 3:05 PM
There is most definitely an indigenous northern California architecture, definitively expressed through the last century through examples ranging from the work of Julia Morgan and Bernard Maybeck through local designers like Roger Scott, Bob McCabe, and some of 'the Greeks' (yes, they call themselves that), and a whole host in between. This design ephraetis is expressed through form, function, and materials, and referenced at least in Sacramento in an earlier discussion on this site between myself and Mr. Burg, in which I provided local examples of very good design, either derivative or indigenous, that demonstrate an architecture that is a part of its environment, however that was defined over the past century or so, and either lived with or fought with Sacramento's climate and ecology...

There are numerous infill projects that capture this sensibility in the downtown and midtown areas -- they are sometimes subtle and dwarfed by much larger kleenex-box buildouts by the so-called 'prominent' developers, which are actually for the most part an architectural blight rather than a delight. I believe we need to showcase the good and ban the bad, giving 'design review' some real teeth and some really concerned participants, to make a great valley architecture a thing more noticeable and definitive.

But more I believe we need to express the 'art' of architecture, perhaps even learning from other greats in the industry, by emulating what other great cities have done -- importing the work of the great architects of the world to lead our large commissions. An example of this is the development of the Crocker by Charles Gwathmey, which will ultimately be a stunning place, worthy of considerable note.

1 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 4:26 PM
I'd be very interested in your list of very good design...perhaps a link to that discussion between yourself and Mr. Burg.
1 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 5:32 PM
I don't know HOW on EARTH I found it -- I am SOOO not a 'techie'... but, here it is....

http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17775/Downtown_Sacramento_Weekend_Ghost_Town

I would add one building to this list -- the former SNR office at 21st and about U or so... a building very dear to my own heart, and impeccably designed...
0 0
REPLY
edited on  January 30, 2010 | 4:47 PM
I am interested in a couple of things...
1) Mr. bbbbmer's use of the word "ephraetis" - can't find it in the dictionary and when googled there are 8 entries (only 8!) and many refer to prior quotes of bbbbmer, including one about "Auntie Mame"... could it be "afflatus" (someone else wondered)? Defined as "a divine, creative impulse or inspiration"?
2) REally too bad that Bill Burg and bbbbmer (whoever you are...) could not attend the dialog. Your knowledge of local architecture and history is truly stunning!
Another thing you should know is that I had some 400 pictures, whittled down to 99 that I showed -- I had to present this subject in 20 minutes!
Matt Piner
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 10:17 AM
I borrowed the word 'ephraetis' from AUNTIE MAME, in which she uses the term to express the artistic value of a phrase proposed for the book she intends to write... I don't particularly care if it's not included in a dictionary or in wide reference -- it's a good word, and I'll continue to use it... I'm impressed that I've become so 'googleable'....

I was indeed aware of this event, though I do wish the Urban Design Alliance had an email announcement facility so I could be kept in the loop, but in the post year end whirr of activity that is my life at this time of year, I've been spending a lot of time in San Francisco, where I am also a member of the organization ARCHITECTURE FOR HUMANITY, which I believe has a chapter in Sacramento in David Mogavero's office...

1 1
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 5:13 PM
The "Weekend Ghost Town" thread largely between you and Bill Burg is the most intelligent architectural discussion about Sacramento I have experienced in Sacramento. Bravo.

Given the elevation, I almost hesitate to add a personal favorite (other than, of course, Memorial Auditorium) and that is the Masonic Lodge (?) building on the NWC of 12th and J. Wonderful textures of brick and terra cotta, cherubrium and glowering knights, the most gorgeous street front dresses in town on J and 12th book-ending Tony's the essential delicatessan, a delectably seedy alley facade, a sunken parking lot and the forever peeling mural of Sunday Morning in the Mines by Nahl greeting eastbound traffic on J. There are others of course, many. I am surprised Cal-EPA made your list. The faux redwood forest corner is, nice, but the other 75% of the facade insults the street.
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 7:45 PM
One adaptation to the local climate that people tend to overlook: Our entire downtown core, and to some extent our entire city, was adapted to overcome the climate-based problem of regular flooding!

About 500 acres of downtown Sacramento were raised 10-15 feet, as part of a massive engineering project to keep downtown Sacramento above water. Brick walls ran down every street, nearly every building jacked up to the new street level, massive excavation (almost entirely by muscle power!) to fill in the streets.

Then there were the other engineering projects, again adaptations to the landscape: We diverted the American River from its old mouth, near the foot of the I Street railroad bridge, to its current location, a mile farther from downtown. We built massive levees, first just around the city but eventually spreading out into the Delta and lowlands, turning former floodlands into suburbs and industrial parks (Natomas is nothing new!), all acts that shaped the landscape to our own needs. The "Delta basement" is also a climate adaptation, but personally I think it has more to do with ventilation than flood control.

Finally,the city gave the Central Pacific Railroad a swamp, known as Sutter Lake or China Slough. They filled it in over the course of decades, building an industrial complex now known as the Railyards, for decades Sacramento's biggest employer. They didn't finish filling it in until about 1920, and the last bit of China Slough is now where the Sacramento Valley Amtrak depot and the offices of the Sacramento Press now stand!
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 12:41 AM
I believe that because you were not there, you could be missing part of the point, which has to do with getting across a sense of urgency and a change in how we think about buildings. The adaptation to climate and region, looking at what we've done to date was but one aspect and dimension. The impetus for me was to create a new framework and challenge for us in the 21st century -- in the age of skyrocketing population, scarce resources, peak oil, climate change, species die-offs and sickening pollution (ie Pacific gyre), natural calamity and wars that are basically between haves and have nots -- to realize the timescape "window" we have to prepare, and to change how we consume. We need to to think then act in radically fresh and new ways in order to provide a new legacy to the future. It really goes to a sense of responsibility, not fashion or pretty buildings. -- It's about how these buildings "work" - their "commodity" as users of energy to provide comfort. Delight will always be there (make it look good), we know this as part of our training -- but the component we now MUST incorporate is that of environmental impact and wise use of resources. That, for me at least as the presenter - was the main point. My hope is to get folks to change how they think -- then transform the way they practice and ultimately evolve what we build. Then here -- in Sacramento-- develop a leadership position in so doing. This vision is also how we pull ourselves out of a recession - in my opinion - because it's what everyone knows we have to do!!! The next economy will be sustainable, if we make it an economy ABOUT sustainability. Nature is the model...
One woman who was there -- a tall, blonde lady -- made an impassioned statement toward the end of the discussion that drew applause from the group - that this generation will either be praised or vilified by the future - depending on what we do (or don't do) in the next 5-10 years, and starting NOW!
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 8:52 AM
I think the folks in Sacramento faced with destruction of the city by flooding definitely got the whole "sense of urgency" thing--so much that they bucked convention and actually agreed to tax themselves (with some kicking and screaming) to pay for the very expensive measures that saved the city.

Similarly, the main argument against doing the sort of things that may well save us on a global scale is that they are expensive and difficult, and the water isn't puddling up around our knees yet, so what's the problem? Those who looked ahead, and acted with urgency, are the ones who solved the problem--the grumblers merely benefited from their foresight.
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 10:06 AM
Bill - Once I re-read you comment, I realized this -- that the effort to raise an entire portion of a City was indeed an amazing and massive feat of construction that was extremely expensive and difficult, and was brought about by an urgency. WE owe a huge debt to that generation of great-and great-great grandparents for their efforts (along with our trees, etc.). This is at the same scale of what needs to be done, starting now. All the more impressive to consider it was done as you say by "muscle power" - man and beast. And you are right that the actual experience of being flooded - on a repeat basis - was what made it happen.
What you say also gives me the sinking feeling that the "doomsayers" are right -- today's issues are not really felt locally, not enough to spur us into action on that same scale. People are basically short-sighted, set in their self-interested and distracted ways and no amount of warning about impending disaster will change that. The car we are collectively riding along in with the "itunes" blasting is speeding toward a cliff, and the ones who know about it or who at least want to say - "take the next exit or at least slow down so you can turn away before it's too late!" - are locked in the trunk (not my saying - Paul Hawken said something to this effect...).
We either choose to be pro-active with some constructive results, or just have a good time and leave it to the next generations to suffer the consequences.
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2010 | 8:58 PM
Thank you Matthew Piner and coverage by Suzanne Hurt/Sac Press for bringing this information and interesting discussion.
1 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 4:05 PM
Surely housing before the age of AC adapted to climate as well as style would allow, and some adaptations were pretty clever. I'm personally more interested in a purely indigenous style...one built today. At a minimum it should respond, exquisitely, to its climate, its geography and the history of its users, yes? It absolutely must express the fundamentals of its financing and markets. It should express the collective wisdom of the society that built it and the unique qualities of it's place and time. So just what is this unique architecture for Sacramento, the Capital of the West, located at the crossroads of the Great Central Valley, in 2010, on the edge of epochs?

What do we want the city we build in the next 20 years to tell our great grand children about us? What aspirations are worthy to be cast in stone?
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 9:07 PM
My aunt had one of the first Eichler's in Sacramento's Land Park, very innovative, very spacious, and utterly un-AC'd... And yet, I remember as a kid visiting during our hot hot hot summers and that the home was cool -- much cooler than even my mom's home in OLP, at least until we installed 'central' in the early 60's for the first time...

We all kind of gravitated to my aunt's house though, perhaps subconsciously, because it was striking in its design but very very comfortable to gather in...

Now many of these Eichler homes are prized in all of their forms and areas, though some fought their initial design intent by plopping ranch-style gabled roofs atop, and stretching ungainly ducts across their roofs for that needed AC element... But later on, as their worth became known, even architects bought them and renovated them very creatively but in keeping with their modern vernacular and incorporating indigenous materials, like untreated redwood and the like...

I find these old Eichlers to have an appropriateness for this environment, and to be striking statements of architectural grace and elegance...albeit a bit small...as I've gotten bigger..
1 1
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 4:33 PM
To "bbbbmer": UDA does indeed send email announcements regarding the monthly 4th Wednesday Design Dialogue to its mailing list. To have your email address added to the list, please send an email to info@udasacramento.org. Thanks.
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 8:55 PM
Thank you...
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 11:18 PM
I tried to send info to your udasacramento.org url, but it failed. Your website seems based on wordpress.org at the moment, that is udasacramento.wordpress.org...

0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 4:45 PM
Americans have devoted significant creative energy to self-transformation designed to enable us to join the GLOBAL village. Figuring out who we are uniquely and LOCALLY as Sacramentans seems to me like one of those forgotten masteries.
0 0
REPLY
January 30, 2010 | 8:59 PM
'Local' is great, as long as 'local' designers 'get it'... Unfortunately far too many do not, and I believe there is room to import great works from the great international designers as well, particularly for our larger commissions.... just as many other cities have 'collected' their due and made their cities greater because of it...

I think a happy medium or golden mean can be struck in the balance of 'local' and 'imported' design sensibilities -- so long as we avoid a bland mediocrity which seems to abound, especially with the kleenex-boxing of the downtown, and the tilt-upization of the 'burbs...

I do applaud your group's efforts, though, and I will place my email addy on your site forthwith...

Thank you again...
0 0
REPLY
edited on  February 1, 2010 | 5:37 PM
Figuring out who we are usually involves taking a look at where we have been...which, in the case of a city, means learning about our city's history and then sharing what was learned. On the macro scale, an understanding of American history, and how Americans have treated the landscape in our expansion across the continent, may help guide how we decide to interact with the land we inhabit in the future.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background