STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Hiltachk appeals decision on strong mayor initiative

by Kathleen Haley, published on January 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

A prominent supporter of the strong mayor initiative has appealed a Sacramento County Superior Court judge’s decision to ban the initiative from the June ballot.

Thomas Hiltachk, the attorney who wrote the initiative, appealed Judge Loren McMaster’s ruling on Monday to the Third District Court of Appeal.

In the strong mayor government outlined in the initiative, the mayor would assume the city manager’s powers and create the city budget. Mayor Kevin Johnson has led efforts to put the measure on the ballot.

"We expect that the Appellate Court will side with the people," Hiltachk said in a press release Monday afternoon.

In December, Bill Camp challenged the initiative in Sacramento County Superior Court. Camp sued the city of Sacramento, the Sacramento City Council and Hiltachk.

McMaster decided last Thursday that the initiative did not follow state law and should not be placed on the ballot.

Read Hiltachk’s appeal here.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 25, 2010 | 9:18 PM
"A prominent supporter of the strong mayor initiative" might be referred to in the first paragraph as "The author of of the strong mayor initiative ..."

This watered down journalism ............. is what SacPress wants?
4 2
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 12:33 AM
She got it in the second paragraph:
"Thomas Hiltachk, the attorney who wrote the initiative, appealed Judge Loren McMaster’s ruling on Monday to the Third District Court of Appeal"
6 0
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 7:55 AM
The only thing 'prominent' about Tom Hiltachckck is his capacity to lie, front for corrupt GOP interests (as if there were any other kind), and poorly draft the SMI to the point of its present legal entanglements...

Like my nana from 'old country' used to say, "oy, what a yutz!"....
5 1
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 10:13 AM
So then, you agree, he's a prominent guy ... :)
0 2
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 4:53 PM
Not in the manner intended by the article....
1 0
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 6:11 PM
It does water it down, doesn't it? Dilute the impact of the truth, which is the strong supporter is also the Mayor's lawyer is also the author of the Strong Mayor Initiative?

What if:

"The author of the strong mayor initiative has appealed a Sacramento County Superior Court judge’s decision to ban the initiative from the June ballot."

"Thomas Hiltachk, a strong supporter of the initiative, appealed Judge Loren McMaster’s ruling on Monday to the Third District Court of Appeal."

Well, yeah, that sounds kinda silly. Cuz he WROTE it and represents the MAYOR and is arguing the CASE.
6 1
REPLY
January 25, 2010 | 9:24 PM
What a mess!! Shame on Mr Hiltachk and shame on Mayor Johnson!!

It must be nice to have so much time, energy, money to focus on a SMP... Personally, I am sick and tired of being sick and tired of Mayor Johnson and his SMP.

I hope and expect " that the Appellate Court will side with the people," The people being Mr Camp and city residents whose mayor- a public servant- failed to involve and work with the public when developing a SMP and yet has the nerves, the audacity, to continuously state Judge McMaster isn't acknowledging city residents, ignores the people....

Never in my life have I been so disgusted with an individual, never have I had so much distaste for a local political figure that I now have for Mayor Johnson. This man doesn't see battles which are more immediately concerning???? He has nothing else to fight???? It must be nice to not focus on life and freedom... IT MUST BE NICE to be able to put all your time, energy and immediate focus on a self-absorbed SMP. And since he appears to be such a fighter I EXPECT him to fight with just as much determination, just as significantly, for life and freedom for city youth and if not he better use this SMP as practice for a bigger battle- a bigger fight THAT HE WILL HAVE once he's exhausted his SMP court run, IF he gives minimal effort towards LIFE AND FREEDOM. And this is not a threat- it is a PROMISE. Mayor Johnson engaging in a SMP fight and ignoring LIFE and FREEDOM is unacceptable and will not be tolerated and he will be held accountable.
7 1
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 12:44 AM
Voters should know more about the man who is really behind the initiative. He has been the attorney behind many of the worst right wing causes pushed around California.

From Bossmayor.com, in the words of SacPress's frequent contributor and Mayor Johnson's spokesman, Steve Maviglio:

"Here’s what Maviglio wrote about that part-time initiative and its creator, just last month on the Calbuzz blog: 'Here in California, the initiative is Exhibit A for what’s wrong with our state’s initiative process. It’s the brainchild of the right-wing initiative factory propped up by an AstroTurf ‘citizens group.’ Its author is conservative Sacramento lawyer Tom Hiltachk, whose last failed effort was an attempt to divide California’s electoral votes.'

"Even more ironically, Maviglio blasts the part-time effort because it would weaken the legislature and hamper their crucial oversight, allowing the governor 'to drive the public policy agenda without accountability.'"

http://bossmayor.com/2010/01/written-by-doctor-of-darkness-of.html
7 1
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 12:51 AM
Thank you for sharing the above information!
5 1
REPLY
January 26, 2010 | 7:59 AM
Wow! Even *I* didn't know Maviglio exhibited such a willingness to sell what's left of his integrity to the highest bidder in such a dramatically demonstrable way.... I do know that this is perhaps the reason Karen Bass wanted no part of him when she was elected Speaker of the Assembly, and there are many rumors about similar stories associated with his history that are similar in tone and substance...
6 1
REPLY
edited on  January 28, 2010 | 8:24 AM
'"We expect that the Appellate Court will side with the people," Hiltachk said in a press release Monday afternoon.'

I'm so tired of the Mayor and his supporters referring to SMP as what the people want. Who says this is what the people want? A list of questionably obtained ballot signatures does not reflect the will of the people.

5 0
REPLY
January 27, 2010 | 12:08 AM
READ HILTHCHAKCKCK'S APPEAL!!! There are at least two poison pills buried within it -- one opening the door to the ninth district seat and the SMI's silence on the measure (E&O count I), and the second opening the door to a discussion of the methods employed to gather signatures in support of the petition... hopefully pending investigation by a more official body....

I can't WAIT for Camp's response!
4 1
REPLY
edited on  January 28, 2010 | 8:53 AM
On top of which the legal counsel, in their appeal brief, continues to use the >50,000 Sacramentans outright falsehood. The unsubmitted version of the appeal available here is the same as on the SAG website. Given the slight-of-hand dealings so far exhibited, until a stamped, filed version is available I would only look upon this as a draft.

Remember that 25K loan to SAG that somehow, got turned into a contribution to avert a conflict-of- interest...the occurance of which was solely based on a typed date on a letter, Hence from the FPPC: A-09-213 Thomas W. Hiltachk-...
"Specifically, the Mayor’s loan to the committee, subsequently forgiven and thereby converted to a contribution, does not leave the Mayor with an economic interest in the committee."

And how about that $1000.00 a head fundraiser next Thursday? Can you hear the chants?
"Need More Spin!"-"Spin Cost Money"-Need More Spin.....
3 0
REPLY
February 10, 2010 | 5:02 PM
Mr. Hiltachk is a shill for conservative causes on all fronts but the move to mayoral control, or a unitary executive, follows a long line of cities that have recently done so, most notably recently Milwaukee. This is the trend towards authoritarian control by corporations that need coin operated politicians like Johnson and slick 'barristers or sham artists' like Hiltachk. He's little more than a hired gun for the leisure class.

Johnson is merely a representative for corporations, his backers. Mr. Hiltachk is the henchman and puppet-master. There job is clear: they wish to privatizes all of California's services but most notably education. Thus they will need to squeeze education by attacking proposition 98, gutting education.

Last Thursday, the attorney general released a title and summary for an initiative
<http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i889_initiative_09-0091.pdf>
that is one of the sixty-nine currently "on the street" seeking signatures to qualify for the November ballot. However, to my knowledge, this is the only one that would throw community colleges to the wolves. The initiative makes several changes to the state budget, most notably takes community colleges out of Proposition 98, and leaves our colleges fighting for funding the state general fund.

This is what they want. They want to make government fail so they can privatize every aspect of education. To do this they need a process like New Orleans, with little oversight, no transparency and complete managerial control. They form astro-turf organizations, make sure they are funded, usually in secret, and then hit the streets to convince people that public education is not in their best interests. They are the destroyers, not builders.

Johnson must go, his sweetheart Michelle Rhee is in the same killing fields in Washington, D.C. There, they have mayoral control and she is Chancellor of Education, assuring the public schools are not funded, fail, close them and then 'charter them up'.

If we do not stop them they will bankrupt California, slide all of our taxes, as the corporations pay none, to the silk pockets of the 'free market fundamentalists'. Be 'wery, wery careful, it is time to hunt rabbits.

See my posts at dailycensored.com

Dr. Danny Weil
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background