Tag Cloud
In my first article for this storyline I discussed several simple steps that individuals can implement to reduce their water consumptions. To read more about simple conservation tips, please click on the green storyline tab and select the article titled, "The Crisis." However, in this time of crisis immediate action is a necessary step, so it is also useful to consider the more drastic methods of conservation, such as drought-resistant landscaping.
Outdoor residential water use accounts for 21 percent of all urban water use, according to the Pacific Institute, an environmental research group located in the East Bay. Activities included under this umbrella term of "Residential Outdoor" water use are landscaping, hosing down walkways and driveways (though this is discouraged by city water officials), and recreational use like swimming pools.
Landscaping is the most water demanding among these activities. It accounts for over 50 percent of residential water expenditure, according to a brochure published by the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities. That luscious green is beautiful, but it demands an immense amount of our valuable, and dwindling, supply of water. In fact, a traditional lawn of 1,000 square feet requires about 2 inches of water per week, amounting to 100,000 gallons of water per year.
An increasingly popular alternative to the traditional lawn-centered landscape is dry landscaping, or "xeriscaping." By using drought-resistant and native plants, groundcovers, rocks and smart landscape design, xeriscaping aims to drastically reduce the amount of water needed for landscapes. Many people have misinterpreted the term "xeriscape" to mean "zero-scape", where use of greenery is limited, leaving landscapes looking barren. This is not an accurate interpretation of the goals of xeriscaping. Dry landscapes can be very aesthetically pleasing when executed properly. Other benefits of xeriscaping include pesticide freedom, supporting native eco-systems, and reducing the amount of maintenance required.
In addition to native plants, there are some other landscaping options that will help save water. For example, Eco-Lawn is a blend of organic, wild meadow grasses that requires little water and infrequent mowing. The company that produces Eco-Lawn, Wildflower Farm, claims that it uses 75 percent less water than a traditional lawn and needs to be mowed only once a month to maintain a neat appearance. An Eco-Lawn of 1,000 square feet uses only 25,600 gallons a year, which is 1/4 of the water needed for the traditional lawn.
On the Wildflower Farm Web site, there is a chart that compares total costs for installing and maintaining a traditional lawn compared to an Eco-Lawn over 10 years. If their claims are accurate, consumers could save about $1,900 in the first year and about $6,500 over the full 10 years.
Tom Larson, a former member of the Nursury Growers Association of California, created a list of ideas for a California-friendly landscape that can be easily implemented. Larson points out that it is the soil and the microorganisms in the soil that are responsible for a healthy plant, not the fertilizers that we put into the soil. Larson advises gardeners to avoid chemical fertilizers, which often kill these organisms, and to feed their soil with compost, fish emolsion, and organic fertilizers.
Two other suggestions he offers are adding mulch between plants to keep the ground cool and limit evaporation, and to compost. Composting reduces green waste and feeds your soil at the same time!
Going lawnless or using alternative breeds like the wild grasses of Eco-Lawn requires considerably less labor for maintenance, saves water and money, and helps to reduce the damage of drought on our earth. The California Department of Water Resources and the University of California Cooperative Extension have put out a 160-page document that describes, at great length, how to calculate water needs for specific landscapes and how to plan a landscape with a particular water-use goal in mind. A quick internet search also turns up hundreds of great articles about how to get started on converting your yard to drought-friendly species and design.
Do you have a dry landscape? How much water do you save? Are you pleased with the appearance of your yard? Do you compost your green waste? I want to hear about your experience with xeriscaping. Please add your comments and questions in the conversation space below.
I tore out the turf and capped off most of the sprinkler heads. I installed a French drain to direct water away from the house and foundation. I added landscape fabric to prevent weeds, and topped it with redwood bark. I planted a dozen or so low-water shrubs and herbs (sage, lavender, rosemary, aloe vera, etc) and installed a low-water drip system (it drips water directly on the ground at the base of the plant instead of sending water everywhere.) The plants have had a while to grow in, and while it was originally a little sparse, it has filled in nicely while not overwhelming the house. We don't have a water meter yet so I don't know how much water it saves, but I like the way it looks.
I am going to do the same to my mow-strip area, including an expanded drip system to water my street trees, a bicycle bollard (so visiting friends with bikes can lock up safely,) and some decorative brick.
Next is the backyard. I'm a gardener so about half will be a vegetable garden, but those, unlike grass, I can eat. Even that will be fed by a drip/targeted sprinkler system, and mulched, so it will use less water than a conventional sprinkler-fed lawn. The rest will be paved with permeable brick, which will provide me with an entertainment area and driveway (I don't have a driveway now) but will allow water to pass directly through to the ground, unlike a conventional concrete driveway.
Great article--good to know there are others in the neighborhood working on similar ideas!
As a gardener, do you ever utilize the community garden in Southside Park?
Thanks for clarifying xeriscaping and 'zero scaping' I think there's a lot of confusion there.
Another issue that I've heard come up is if people stop watering their lawn to conserve water, and it dies, they can be fined (if they leave it that way)- because the appearance is a nuisance to neighbors. It's funny how the green lawns that have become a staple to neighborhoods may now be a thing of the past - as drought resistant landscaping takes over.
And yes, a lot of city regulations about green lawns, put in place to prevent people from just letting their lawns go wild, are now coming back to bite us. Code enforcement laws have their place, but when these laws were made up people weren't thinking about concepts like xeriscaping or household gardening. An old city code prohibiting vegetable gardening on front lawns was recently removed from city codes. While there are some good reasons to leave in rules about dead, untended lawns (fire hazard etc.) changing the rules to allow for low-water lawns seems like it would be worthwhile. Give Rob Fong a call!
One thing to note is that code enforcement is complaint driven: the only reason that person got a fine is because their neighbors complained, probably more than once, to the city. Code enforcement staff don't patrol around looking for people to fine...