STORYLINE The Docks Area Project

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

The Docks, Part I: The Plan

by Sarah Payne, published on October 14, 2008 at 12:26 AM

1 of 6
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 6
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

 Have you ever been to the part of the Sacramento River sandwiched between Capital City Freeway and Old Sac? This particular area, dubbed "The Docks," is certainly not the most attractive place to hold a riverside picnic.  It is desolate and barren where dirt grows like grass and old generating plants and reservoirs go to die. However, that will change as the city readies itself once again for the Docks Area Project. 

On September 30, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed AB 2026, a bill allowing the Department of Parks and Recreation to transfer surplus properties through sale or exchange. This means that the city can now acquire the last three parcels of land it needs to begin Phase I of the project. Once this transfer is made, the city can continue with the Sacramento Docks Area Draft Specific Plan, adopted in January 2008.  

The plan outlines the project's goal of creating an urban neighborhood and a publicly accessible riverfront while promoting green and environmentally friendly policies. The city wants to do this by turning the Docks area between the river and Front Street, Capital Mall and I-80, into a mixed-use neighborhood, allowing for the construction of residences, retail and office space, public parks, and a riverside promenade accessible to the surrounding communities. 

The most exciting aspect of the Docks project is the riverside promenade, which will extend along the levee from O Street to R Street. Already designed by Walker Macy, the promenade will offer public access to the waterfront, providing a space for regional recreation as well as promoting the river's ecological value. Easily accessible to the surrounding neighborhoods, the promenade will also serve as a link between several different Sacramento communities. For example, Southside Park community members can enjoy easy access to the promenade and the Docks' neighborhood using the proposed bike trail across the R Street Bridge over I-5. 

The promenade will also connect the surrounding communities with the Docks' residential neighborhood, which will hold approximately 1,115 units of housing and retail space, at least one park, and a hotel. The three streets between the I-5 and the river - Park Street, River Street, and Front Street - are intended connectors between the Docks' neighborhood and the surrounding neighborhoods.  Park Street is set to function as the interior connection between neighboring communities, while River Street will act as the main retail street. Front Street will provide an access road for vehicles, public transit, and bicycles.

However, as with any development project, the Docks Area Project poses some serious foreseeable problems.  For example, one problem comes from the Pioneer Reservoir, an overflow receptacle for Sacramento's combined sewer system. The Pioneer Reservoir is situated in the center of the Docks, a prime location perfect for a public park. As of now, the Draft Specific Plan poses two alternate solutions: either relocate the Pioneer Reservoir to another location and make room for the park, or reconstruct it, cap it, and build the park on top of it.    

Near the Pioneer Reservoir lies another problem: the area of contaminated soil that once held a PG&E natural gas tank as well as a coal-gas generating plant. And, a lesser problem comes from the Docks' proximity to two noisy freeways, the I-5 and Highway 50. On top of all this, the city still needs to worry about the ever-increasing cost in a period of unstable economy.   

How will this issue of cost affect the city of Sacramento, and the residents of its various communities? How will any of these problems affect the neighboring communities?  How will this development affect the riverside's neighbors of Southside Park? What kind of retail would benefit the surrounding communities?   

For more information, visit www.cityofsacramento.org.    

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 14, 2008 | 7:00 AM
Sarah, Thanks for the helpful article! If anyone's interested, Southside Park Neighborhood Association as a printed copy of the recent draft environmental impact report on the Docks plan (thanks to the generosity of Sac Press). I haven't finished going through all 500 pages, but I want to look more into transportation in the plan: how car-dependent would it be? Will it accommodate a future extension of the possible future streetcar line now being discussed for over the Tower Bridge? In my personal comments to the City on the DEIR, I wondered whether the grid pattern is really necessary and appropriate for that small, oddly-shaped slice of riverfront--maybe a design more like a college campus would fit better? I'm not saying it should be a college campus, but perhaps it could look more like one, emphasizing non-motor-vehicle modes. Just food for thought--hopefully not too late for consideration if indeed it turns out to be a good idea.
2 0
REPLY
October 14, 2008 | 1:28 PM
To add to the DEIR comment: I think it would be great to highlight some of the areas of interest and concern. The whole document is so big!
We could cover some areas of concern one by one with quotes directly from the document.
1 0
REPLY
October 20, 2008 | 2:49 PM
I was planning on writing a couple of seeds on the DEIR, focusing mainly on chapter 5 and the appendices, but it would also be awesome to have a community member's perspective on it.
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2008 | 7:04 AM
PS if anyone wants to get a look at our print copy of the DEIR, contact SPNA at 265-6401 or southsidepark@gmail.com
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2008 | 8:41 AM
I like the idea of making better use of our waterfront- Sacramento does a very poor job of showcasing the beauty. I grew up back east where the waterfront is the jewel of the area, well-used and accessible and a destination for locals and tourists alike.
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2008 | 10:49 AM
Kevin Johnson has mad a big point about this issue during the mayoral debates. His example was to San Antonio TX.
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2008 | 8:49 PM
Hhhmmmmmm...I didn'tknow he and I agreed on anything. : )
0 1
REPLY
October 25, 2008 | 12:35 PM
The City should not be funding private development projects... however the City should invest in infrastructure which will incentivize private development.

The Docks area plan is great... but it's economic feasibilty is hazy, because there are clean-up costs & State bureaucracy to deal with (see Ahnold's past interference regarding the railroad museum) - where it's a small sliver of land to fight over. I like the plan, but I think it's putting the cart before the horse. The City needs to invest in infrastructure, e.g. supporting decking I-5, a Broadway Bridge, buying up superfund sites then footing the bill to clean them up & THEN sell the land back to private developers. I hope the Docks Plan happens... but if they make it all nice & pretty no one will go there when they have to traverse across a measly bootbridge or go through industrial-bilght on Broadway.
1 0
REPLY
February 19, 2009 | 7:44 PM
The City just celebrated the groundbreaking today and the 5.4 millon dollar project will be complete by the end of the year. The project will feature new street furniture, look out points, and a .4 acre park. Considered a catalyst project, it will create about 75 jobs during construction -- a warm welcome and a spirt of hope during a time of economy uncertainy.
0 0
REPLY
March 7, 2010 | 10:46 AM
this boondoggle isn't adding anything that wasn't already there. ... it's now March 2010 and it's still being worked on so, sac 1380, you were full of it 13 months ago
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background