STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

While local media outlets have reported on the third-party investigation of Sacramento’s development department, the details of the investigation are complex.

City Attorney Eileen Teichert shed light on the investigation’s details in a phone interview with The Sacramento Press last week.

The city, together with the third-party law firm Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai, is investigating the Community Development Department’s approval this year of 35 building permits in a Natomas flood zone.

Teichert’s office acknowledges in a Dec. 15 letter to the Federal Emergency Management Agency that the city broke federal rules when it approved the permits.

The city has placed Community Development Director Bill Thomas and department staffer Dan Waters on administrative leave.

During last week’s interview, Teichert addressed why the city and the third-party firm are working together on the investigation. She also provided a response to the question of whether City Manager Ray Kerridge was being investigated on this issue.

Teichert said she does not have an estimate on when the investigation will be complete.

The Sacramento Press: As I understand it — and correct me if I’m wrong — but the investigation into the Natomas building permits is being carried out by the third-party firm [Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai] and the city. Is the city partnering with the third-party firm?

City Attorney Eileen Teichert: Yes. Of course someone has to provide the interface between how the city operates and is organized, how to reach people, how to get documents and so on. Pursuant to the direction that we’ve received from the City Council, my office, along with the city manager’s office, is providing that coordination.

SP: Why is the city participating in the investigation if a third party was hired? Wouldn’t city participation then make the investigation less objective?

Teichert: Again, as I indicated, someone has to coordinate. My office had to serve as the conduit to hire the outside law firm. We’re the only ones pursuant to the charter authorized to retain outside counsel. So, that was why we did that.

And, in order to preserve attorney/client-privileged communication, those communications go through our office. And, we have to be able to ... obtain records and documents for [independent investigator Tim Yeung’s review] in order to be able to conduct [a] fair, objective investigation and interviews. Based upon his own opinion that he arrives at, as a result of reviewing records and meeting with witnesses without being influenced by staff ...

We agree it’s of the utmost importance that the investigation be conducted fairly and impartially.

SP: Was City Manager Ray Kerridge being investigated as part of the investigation into the Natomas building permits?

Teichert: We are not targeting any individual and I cannot comment on personnel matters. But again, we are using a fair and objective process and not starting into the investigation with any preconceived notions about who’s being targeted or what we expect to achieve.

SP: What is the status of Community Development Director Bill Thomas? Do you know if he’s coming back?

Teichert: The status of Bill Thomas is as it has been for the last number of weeks — that he is still on administrative leave.

Photo by David Watts Barton.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  December 24, 2009 | 12:10 PM
They shouldn't treat these guys any worse than they would treat anybody else. If I added a patio cover on to my house without a valid permit they would make me tear it down. (Once I got a demo permit of course.)
0 0
REPLY
December 24, 2009 | 3:47 PM
It's not quite that simple. If you made a business out of adding patio covers to people's houses but didn't get permits for your work, and told your customers that everything you did was legal and permitted, that goes beyond simply requiring that the work be reversed. That's a pattern of fraudulent behavior that involves both breaking regulations and lying to people about it. If you were an employee of a firm that built pool covers, and your boss told you to tell customers that you got permits and everything was legal even though he didn't, that goes beyond a simple oversight. The point of the investigation is to determine whether these were simply isolated incidents by individuals who didn't know they were breaking the rules, or by people who knew the rules and were trying to slip it by hoping nobody would notice. Or was circumventing regulations (while assuring customers that everything was legal) a practice condoned or encouraged by senior city management staff? If so, it goes beyond a simple solution and suggests more serious housecleaning is needed.
3 1
REPLY
edited on  December 24, 2009 | 2:54 PM
Stevie..you must be related to one of them.

I especially like Teichert's comment: "... in order to preserve attorney/client-privileged communication, those communications go through our office..." Why would she say this? hmm...well she makes it very clear...she does not want the public to EVER have access to the public records generated through the investigation...they City will claim attorney client privilidge on everything related to the investigation.

They will cover the whole thing up.
3 1
REPLY
December 26, 2009 | 8:24 PM
What I do not read in this article/interview is anything related to the Builder that was 'using existing' permits to build these homes. Is big builder K. Hovnanian going to answer for its employees questionable activities?
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background