STORYLINE Environment Sacramento

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Drive 55 and thrive, apologies to KP

by Harry Osibin, published on January 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Here's the bit: there's this guy in Sacramento who's active in veterans rights, alternative transportation and the environment, who started this campaign called drive55.org, meaning you don't drive faster than 55 mph.

I interviewed him for my radio show and mentioned him a while back in my "Best of 2008" radio interviews which appeared here. He thinks that American motor vehicle operators should drive no faster than 55 miles-per-hour. Period. If your vehicle is human-powered (not by body fat) I guess you can go faster.

Tim Castleman is a man of patience and vision, who is taking a common sense approach to one of America's most volatile debates. In the '70s in order to preserve oil and blunt OPEC, our federal leaders passed a mandatory 55 mph speed limit into law.

Apparently the nation's vehicles did, in fact, get better mileage and save fuel. Side benefit: Highway deaths went down.

As pump prices leveled over the years and with much political wrangling, the power of the speed limit was returned to the states, which is probably just as well, constitutionally. As a consequence we are legally and illegally driving faster than 55, way faster.

But Tim Castleman is not campaigning for new laws, a constitutional amendment or anything coercive. To paraphrase, he thinks that driving no faster than 55 is the right thing to do.

He says that driving no faster than 55 mph will conserve fuel, save lives, save money, reduce some of our reliance on foreign oil, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, move us closer to true "energy indpendance" and give everyone naturally wavy hair. (Just kidding on the last one.)

By taking these measures (observing all speed limits and never exceeding 55 mph), no new technology need be introduced, no new laws need be passed, wars on multiple-fronts would be unnecessary and everyone gets to keep more of the money they earn.

The issue is neither Republican nor Democratic, liberal nor conservative, Hatfield nor McCoy, Agent versus Agent, Ranger versus Yogi, nor Grizzlies versus RiverCats. (PCL baseball reference).

Since founding drive55.org in 2008 Castleman has maintained the website, been ambushed on FOX and other right-wing media outlets and is now making available peel-away window stickers. He says, they are "removable 4 X 11 window clings for inside vehicles to warn speeders of the conservation-minded driver ahead." 

Could anyone object to this simple voluntary step that costs no money?

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 9, 2009 | 4:39 PM
Its tough to go 55 when I am late, but this article brings up many good points that I will take into consideration next time I am on time driving on the freeway.
0 0
REPLY
Dan
Author thumbnail
January 10, 2009 | 6:07 AM
Driving 55 while everyone else drives 65, or even having half the drivers drive slow and the others fast on a freeway, increases the chances of an accident significantly. I don't think saving 1-3% of gas consumption, if even that, is worth putting lives at risk.
0 0
REPLY
January 10, 2009 | 1:03 PM
I don't buy into the idea that driving 55 actually saves fuel over driving at higher speeds. I have made a few trips to and from LA and traveling down I-5 I routinely drive anywhere between 75 - 95 and my own personal experience is that aside from making the non-stop trip in four hours forty-five minutes, I don't have to stop for gas.

The two times I made it a point to gauge the fuel consumption at the higher speeds, one tank of gas was sufficient to make the drive from Elk Grove to downtown Hollywood, 368 miles. One time was in my 1993 Buick Regal V6 with a 16 gallon tank and the other time was in my 1997 VW Jetta four cylinder, five speed manual with a 14 gallon tank.

The Jetta was the best as I didn't have to refuel until the next day. The Regal made it but I had to get gas as soon as I got off the freeway at Calvine Rd/99.

For the speed... from Fresno until the Grapevine on I-5 people tend to not pay much attention to the posted 75 limit. I have been going 80 - 85 on that stretch and had people flash me to get out of the fast lane. It is an insane stretch of road when it comes to speed.

Highway 80 from Sacramento to the Bay Area can rival it for sure.
0 0
REPLY
January 12, 2009 | 7:46 AM
Telling others to slowdown be it working(labor unions), driving or riding a bike has since time immemorial been met with heavy resistence and often simply impeeds progress. Slower culteres and nations tend to try and stop faster more efficient ones. These covert attempts never work. What could work is a campaign to increase ones ability or reaction time and ultimately the ability in being there when moments of urgency arise. Saying no to drugs (again) is a good idea although this writer is a proponent of legalizing drugs and I would say if we were more effective at educating this matter we wouldnt need to contain or warehouse millions of users but that is a different topic all together.

Americans are often "not there" when an urgent situation occurs. We often find people putting on make up or eating a burrito while driving. Some SUVs have several screens with DVDs playing on them. A campaign urging our fellow citizens to BE THERE when at the wheel would probably IMHO create a better result then trying to get us all to slowdown.
0 0
REPLY
January 12, 2009 | 12:17 PM
Some good points to be sure. Rather than argue, I'll point out the fuel savings in driving slower are demonstrable. Are you inferring that there are faster, more efficient cultures and slower, less efficient ones. Who, for instance?
Gosh, I am arguing. "Met with heavy resistance"! No argument there.
0 0
REPLY
January 12, 2009 | 7:48 AM
Why is Sammy Haggars "I cant drive 55" playing in my head?
0 0
REPLY
January 12, 2009 | 12:52 PM
Sammy can probably afford the fuel and traffic citations.
0 0
REPLY
January 13, 2009 | 11:14 PM
My favorite country for driving is italy where bicyclists, vespas, crotch rockets, tractors and BMW touring cars share the road with the greatest of ease.

The why? Because these seperate subgroups of transport recognize and alow the others to exist.

As for saving gas one can find all sorts of ways other than slowing down to save gas. Living near your work environment for one.

1 0
REPLY
January 16, 2009 | 12:58 PM
Crotch rockets??
0 0
REPLY
January 17, 2009 | 4:19 PM
Thats slang for the the bikes that are aerodynamic and very very fast Harry.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background