STORYLINE Downtown Plaza

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Westfield will sell plaza; Mayor seeks buyers

by Suzanne Hurt, published on December 15, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Storyline: Downtown Plaza RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Mayor Kevin Johnson said Tuesday he will start searching for buyers for Downtown Plaza within weeks, after Westfield Group announced its willingness to sell the struggling plaza.

After the holidays, Johnson will start talking to "big developers" and investment groups who understand the plaza's role in revitalizing downtown. Potential buyers could include people interested in developing a new downtown arena at that site, he said.

"Westfield has agreed to step aside, and, if necessary, sell its interests in Downtown Plaza," Johnson said during his weekly press conference Tuesday morning. "That could be very monumental for the downtown corridor. The big news is Westfield is no longer willing to stand in the way of the downtown mall being developed."

The city is "extremely committed" to reviving the plaza, he added.

"It's one of our most important assets," Johnson said. "We want a developer to say, 'This is also a high priority for us.' "

However, Johnson added that Westfield's decision should "enhance" arena developers' ability to talk to Westfield about buying the property for a sports and entertainment center.

Westfield's agreement to sell comes after nearly 12 years of "bad blood" between the company and the city, which has been pressing Westfield to invest in the plaza since buying it in 1998, Johnson said. The company is one of the world's largest shopping mall owners, with more than $47 billion in investments in 119 shopping centers throughout the world.

"Over 12 years, there have been a lot of promises and commitments they haven't been willing to come through on," he said. "All of us feel that mall has never reached its potential in 12 years."

With a main entrance facing 7th and K streets, the Downtown Plaza was built in the 1970s. But the "inward-facing" mall, designed like suburban indoor malls of that era, is now outdated, Johnson said.

Westfield had proposed a $120 million plaza overhaul in 2006. But the company repeatedly stalled on putting those plans into action. In May, Westfield postponed those plans for at least the rest of the year, yet completed a $120 million reinvestment at Westfield Santa Anita in Southern California's Arcadia. Johnson opened negotiations with Westfield in August.

During talks, Westfield representatives said the company was willing to invest in Downtown Plaza, but "not nearly" as much as $120 million, Johnson said. Westfield also did not get on board with the city's new vision to open up the plaza, creating an "outward-facing" mall open to the sky and street traffic, he said.

The plaza, which Johnson said is 70 percent filled, has lost tenants such as Banana Republic and Ann Taylor recently. The mayor said he planned to call the chief executive officer of the plaza's anchor store, Macy's, later Tuesday to assure the department store chain of the city's commitment to creating a "better environment" at the plaza.

A vital plaza is key to the health of K Street Mall and adjacent areas, he said.

"It used to be bustling," Johnson said. "We have a chance to recreate that."

The mayor has been asked to bring potential buyers and investors to Westfield. Westfield is willing to sell if the city can find someone willing to buy the plaza at a "reasonable" rate, Johnson said.

The city and the company will collaborate to find a buyer or investors who can negotiate a price with Westfield.

"Whatever will be done, will be done together," he said. "We'll all be looking out for what's in the best interests of the city and Downtown Plaza."

Westfield Group could not be reached for comment.

Photo by David Watts Barton. Suzanne Hurt is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

December 15, 2009 | 2:01 PM
Very informative story. I hope the city can find a developer that wants to take on this kind of risk.

I'm very impressed with the reporting. I checked out the Sac. Bee story and it is very short and doesn't give much info. I really appreciate the depth that Sac. Press brings to the story and to have it up so fast is impressive. The comparison between the quality of this story and the bee's is very striking - keep up the great work!
4 0
REPLY
December 15, 2009 | 4:05 PM
I agree, the writer wrote an impressive article. I read the information on the channel 3 site and their was also little information immediately available so I checked here and Viola' more information is provided. Great job Sacramento Press and I too appreciate Sacramento Press for their dedication of informing the community of news updates in a timely fashion as well as both thoughtful and informative. Kudo's
3 1
REPLY
edited on  December 15, 2009 | 2:57 PM
I put $50 bucks on the City buying the place with our tax dollars and giving it to David Taylor or the Greek Mob.

The place is a dump and should be torn down.
5 1
REPLY
December 15, 2009 | 4:51 PM
This may be a first, and I hope I'm not delusional, but I agree that this is the probable outcome...
1 0
REPLY
December 15, 2009 | 3:40 PM
Ewhalen is right on, as we used to say in the '60s. Best coverage of local issues is in SacPress. That said, the mayor now has an opportunity to display real leadership. And for once, he seems to be on the right track. Now he needs to see the whole enchilada: re-development of not only the mall but also the 700 & 800 blocks of K Street as s single project. Mall property should be considered for arena sight and vision should include rehab and update of Bel Vue apartments as affordable apartment units. Council needs to establish policy that subsidy (land grant, tax forgiveness, etc.) is conditioned on increased housing and other goals that came out of the JKL Charette 4 years ago.
3 0
REPLY
December 15, 2009 | 4:11 PM
Yeah, build the arena where the plaza is, knock out Macy's and other shops, then downtowners and midtowners can drive to Arden Mall to shop. Then when RR yards are developed develop a new shopping mall there for the new thousands of residents someday.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  December 17, 2009 | 4:28 PM
Anything but an arena. Any arena project should be at the ARCO site, taking advantage of in-place infrastructure and other amenities appropriate for such a use.

Downtown is just too crowded, and plopping an arena there would make it virtually unliveable...

I don't get why people shop Arden Fair... The malling of America is hopefully coming to an end, and that place is an absurd reminder of another era...
0 2
REPLY
edited on  December 16, 2009 | 8:09 AM
Before getting all swept up in the concept of redoing the Mall or bringing on new projects there...Lets have the money in place to do it! That does not mean committing redevelopment tax increments to the project that the STATE already has their eyes on raiding. That would be a formula for tax-payers getting stuck for it "accidentally".

Additionally one only needs look at 3rd & Capitol to have a reality check of "plans and concept" not having financial follow through to complete. Now there's blight created by redevelopment exemplified,right there on the historic entrance to our Capitol City. At least the old "Sacramento Union" building had some assessed value on the property tax bill...even if those taxes where tax increments! Oh yah it's "shovel ready", just design your proposal to utilize all those pilings that look like so many tombstones on the aerial view.

And about that $80,000,000.00 Note we're holding on what has been described as a out of date, not up to NBA or NCCA standards ARCO arena...Let's be sure to have that re-paid before moving away from the ARCO site.
4 0
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 8:23 AM
Last time I checked TIF funds were tax dollars....so your theory is not correct. In the end the taxpayers ALWAYS get left holding the bag for fat cat developers who own our city council.

There is no doubt whatsoever that one of the local fat cat developers who have made large campaign contributions to our corrupt council members will be handed the Mall, and our tax dollars on a silver platter.

0 1
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 1:26 PM
Jim, Tax Increment Funds (TIF's) are "property tax" dollars specifically generated in redevelopment zones that are earmarked specifically for "Brick & Mortar" improvements in redevelopment zones (RDZ). Not General Fund services, you know staffing.. PD, Fire, Schools, Parks-You can build the stations or schools with that money, but you can't staff it!

While the Base Assessment Value for a given property in a redevelopment zone is established at the time of the RDZ being created-and the property taxes generated by that "base" are allocated to general fund expenses-any improvements to the property following that base assessment are assessed as "Tax Increments" and go into the Redevelopment Fund Pot 'O Cash.

So if a project is approved , and Tax Increments are a primary funding source...Brick and Mortar...and the State takes that away...How do you honestly think that will play out? Not do the project or will someone, with a developer's backing, come up with a creative way of proposing increase fees and other taxes that all of us will pay...not just the redevelopment zone property owners- to get that project back on track.
3 0
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 3:20 PM
Um yeah... I don't need to be educated on the subject...but thanks.

TIF funds ARE TAX DOLLARS FOR GODS SAKE! TAX INCREMENT FUNDS.... Jesus H Keeerist.

0 1
REPLY
December 15, 2009 | 6:51 PM
Downtown isn't nearly crowded enough, at least not with residents. The last time K Street was really bustling was when downtown Sacramento was also a residential neighborhood.

Since when is a mall the only place people can shop? I like to go to, you know, STORES, not necessarily those in a mall. I realize that to many people, malls are the only places to shop, but that certainly doesn't have to be the case.

I would miss Macy's, but other than that I can't say I would miss much about Downtown Plaza. Having a place to shop that is within walking distance of work, or a short light-rail ride from home, is an important component that will drive people to live in the central city--along with, you know, HOUSING in the central city. I realize that a lot of developers who have never lived in a neighborhood where they could walk to anything might have trouble with it, but downtown MUST be mixed-use if it is to succeed--people must live there AND shop there AND work there, and there must also be some provision for the people who live in other places to come in, shop, work, and wish they lived there.

Although even they are just going to have to get over the fact that in cities, you have to pay to park.
6 0
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 8:45 AM
If the City was serious about wanting to increase shopping on K Street, they would stop giving everyone parking tickets downtown.

The City cannot manage their finances...because of their irresponsibility, they penalize citizens by increasing parking enforcement, its out of control, and shoppers, go elsewhere.

Parking at all of the local malls outside of downtown, is free.
0 1
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 1:03 PM
Jim, may I suggest some further research on your part? Two Words

Donald Shoup

"His influential book, The High Cost of Free Parking, is leading a growing number of cities to charge fair market prices for curb parking, dedicate the resulting revenue to finance public services in the metered districts, and reduce or remove off-street parking requirements."

http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/

If you are already aware of him and hold to the belief of free parking vs other alternatives, then so be it. If not, at least look at it. Different viewpoints aide in developing consensus.

PS: I am not a "Shupista"
2 0
REPLY
edited on  December 16, 2009 | 5:48 PM
The government should not make revenue off of on street parking. I already pay plenty of taxes for roads.

The threat of a parking ticket keeps shoppers away.
0 1
REPLY
December 16, 2009 | 6:31 PM
The taxes issue aside (because you are laughably wrong), you are aware that Downtown Plaza has an underground parking structure, right?

Parking in the underground structure, or the above-ground structure at 3rd and L, is free for 3 hours if you buy anything in the mall. Buy a cinnamon roll or some tube socks or something, 3 hours free parking. If you go to the theater, you get 4 hours free parking. If for some reason you go over 3 hours, you get charged the princely sum of 75 cents per half hour--not exactly a bank-breaking amount of money if you were going to spend $200 on holiday gifts or what have you.

Street parking in the central city is FREE after 6:00 PM, when most mall stores are still open. Street parking in the central city is FREE all day Sunday, when most mall stores are still open. The only reason you'd get a parking ticket is if you blocked someone's driveway or in a disabled spot or other place where only an idiot would park without expecting a ticket. And frankly, if that stops idiots from coming downtown, all the better.

You do not have a constitutional right to free parking. Parking is "free" at suburban shopping malls because the land there was purchased as cheap farmland, but really, the owner of the property is paying for the parking, and charging you via the price of items in the stores.

Downtown parking is not free because of simple supply and demand: the supply of downtown land is limited, so its price is higher. It's funny how so-called "capitalists" like yourself don't acknowledge concepts like supply and demand if it personally inconveniences you.
1 0
REPLY
December 17, 2009 | 9:04 PM
You do not have to buy anything in the Mall to get free parking. All you have to do is go into Macy's and ask for a validation.

Free parking on the street is absurb. In every major city across America you have to pay to park. If your to lazy to pay the meter, then pay the ticket. Pay your fare.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background