Tag Cloud
Mayor Kevin Johnson said Tuesday he will start searching for buyers for Downtown Plaza within weeks, after Westfield Group announced its willingness to sell the struggling plaza.
After the holidays, Johnson will start talking to "big developers" and investment groups who understand the plaza's role in revitalizing downtown. Potential buyers could include people interested in developing a new downtown arena at that site, he said.
"Westfield has agreed to step aside, and, if necessary, sell its interests in Downtown Plaza," Johnson said during his weekly press conference Tuesday morning. "That could be very monumental for the downtown corridor. The big news is Westfield is no longer willing to stand in the way of the downtown mall being developed."
The city is "extremely committed" to reviving the plaza, he added.
"It's one of our most important assets," Johnson said. "We want a developer to say, 'This is also a high priority for us.' "
However, Johnson added that Westfield's decision should "enhance" arena developers' ability to talk to Westfield about buying the property for a sports and entertainment center.
Westfield's agreement to sell comes after nearly 12 years of "bad blood" between the company and the city, which has been pressing Westfield to invest in the plaza since buying it in 1998, Johnson said. The company is one of the world's largest shopping mall owners, with more than $47 billion in investments in 119 shopping centers throughout the world.
"Over 12 years, there have been a lot of promises and commitments they haven't been willing to come through on," he said. "All of us feel that mall has never reached its potential in 12 years."
With a main entrance facing 7th and K streets, the Downtown Plaza was built in the 1970s. But the "inward-facing" mall, designed like suburban indoor malls of that era, is now outdated, Johnson said.
Westfield had proposed a $120 million plaza overhaul in 2006. But the company repeatedly stalled on putting those plans into action. In May, Westfield postponed those plans for at least the rest of the year, yet completed a $120 million reinvestment at Westfield Santa Anita in Southern California's Arcadia. Johnson opened negotiations with Westfield in August.
During talks, Westfield representatives said the company was willing to invest in Downtown Plaza, but "not nearly" as much as $120 million, Johnson said. Westfield also did not get on board with the city's new vision to open up the plaza, creating an "outward-facing" mall open to the sky and street traffic, he said.
The plaza, which Johnson said is 70 percent filled, has lost tenants such as Banana Republic and Ann Taylor recently. The mayor said he planned to call the chief executive officer of the plaza's anchor store, Macy's, later Tuesday to assure the department store chain of the city's commitment to creating a "better environment" at the plaza.
A vital plaza is key to the health of K Street Mall and adjacent areas, he said.
"It used to be bustling," Johnson said. "We have a chance to recreate that."
The mayor has been asked to bring potential buyers and investors to Westfield. Westfield is willing to sell if the city can find someone willing to buy the plaza at a "reasonable" rate, Johnson said.
The city and the company will collaborate to find a buyer or investors who can negotiate a price with Westfield.
"Whatever will be done, will be done together," he said. "We'll all be looking out for what's in the best interests of the city and Downtown Plaza."
Westfield Group could not be reached for comment.
Photo by David Watts Barton. Suzanne Hurt is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.
I'm very impressed with the reporting. I checked out the Sac. Bee story and it is very short and doesn't give much info. I really appreciate the depth that Sac. Press brings to the story and to have it up so fast is impressive. The comparison between the quality of this story and the bee's is very striking - keep up the great work!
The place is a dump and should be torn down.
Downtown is just too crowded, and plopping an arena there would make it virtually unliveable...
I don't get why people shop Arden Fair... The malling of America is hopefully coming to an end, and that place is an absurd reminder of another era...
Additionally one only needs look at 3rd & Capitol to have a reality check of "plans and concept" not having financial follow through to complete. Now there's blight created by redevelopment exemplified,right there on the historic entrance to our Capitol City. At least the old "Sacramento Union" building had some assessed value on the property tax bill...even if those taxes where tax increments! Oh yah it's "shovel ready", just design your proposal to utilize all those pilings that look like so many tombstones on the aerial view.
And about that $80,000,000.00 Note we're holding on what has been described as a out of date, not up to NBA or NCCA standards ARCO arena...Let's be sure to have that re-paid before moving away from the ARCO site.
There is no doubt whatsoever that one of the local fat cat developers who have made large campaign contributions to our corrupt council members will be handed the Mall, and our tax dollars on a silver platter.
While the Base Assessment Value for a given property in a redevelopment zone is established at the time of the RDZ being created-and the property taxes generated by that "base" are allocated to general fund expenses-any improvements to the property following that base assessment are assessed as "Tax Increments" and go into the Redevelopment Fund Pot 'O Cash.
So if a project is approved , and Tax Increments are a primary funding source...Brick and Mortar...and the State takes that away...How do you honestly think that will play out? Not do the project or will someone, with a developer's backing, come up with a creative way of proposing increase fees and other taxes that all of us will pay...not just the redevelopment zone property owners- to get that project back on track.
TIF funds ARE TAX DOLLARS FOR GODS SAKE! TAX INCREMENT FUNDS.... Jesus H Keeerist.
Since when is a mall the only place people can shop? I like to go to, you know, STORES, not necessarily those in a mall. I realize that to many people, malls are the only places to shop, but that certainly doesn't have to be the case.
I would miss Macy's, but other than that I can't say I would miss much about Downtown Plaza. Having a place to shop that is within walking distance of work, or a short light-rail ride from home, is an important component that will drive people to live in the central city--along with, you know, HOUSING in the central city. I realize that a lot of developers who have never lived in a neighborhood where they could walk to anything might have trouble with it, but downtown MUST be mixed-use if it is to succeed--people must live there AND shop there AND work there, and there must also be some provision for the people who live in other places to come in, shop, work, and wish they lived there.
Although even they are just going to have to get over the fact that in cities, you have to pay to park.
The City cannot manage their finances...because of their irresponsibility, they penalize citizens by increasing parking enforcement, its out of control, and shoppers, go elsewhere.
Parking at all of the local malls outside of downtown, is free.
Donald Shoup
"His influential book, The High Cost of Free Parking, is leading a growing number of cities to charge fair market prices for curb parking, dedicate the resulting revenue to finance public services in the metered districts, and reduce or remove off-street parking requirements."
http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/
If you are already aware of him and hold to the belief of free parking vs other alternatives, then so be it. If not, at least look at it. Different viewpoints aide in developing consensus.
PS: I am not a "Shupista"
The threat of a parking ticket keeps shoppers away.
Parking in the underground structure, or the above-ground structure at 3rd and L, is free for 3 hours if you buy anything in the mall. Buy a cinnamon roll or some tube socks or something, 3 hours free parking. If you go to the theater, you get 4 hours free parking. If for some reason you go over 3 hours, you get charged the princely sum of 75 cents per half hour--not exactly a bank-breaking amount of money if you were going to spend $200 on holiday gifts or what have you.
Street parking in the central city is FREE after 6:00 PM, when most mall stores are still open. Street parking in the central city is FREE all day Sunday, when most mall stores are still open. The only reason you'd get a parking ticket is if you blocked someone's driveway or in a disabled spot or other place where only an idiot would park without expecting a ticket. And frankly, if that stops idiots from coming downtown, all the better.
You do not have a constitutional right to free parking. Parking is "free" at suburban shopping malls because the land there was purchased as cheap farmland, but really, the owner of the property is paying for the parking, and charging you via the price of items in the stores.
Downtown parking is not free because of simple supply and demand: the supply of downtown land is limited, so its price is higher. It's funny how so-called "capitalists" like yourself don't acknowledge concepts like supply and demand if it personally inconveniences you.
Free parking on the street is absurb. In every major city across America you have to pay to park. If your to lazy to pay the meter, then pay the ticket. Pay your fare.