STORYLINE City Services

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City, County to consider consolidating some services

by Kathleen Haley, published on December 7, 2009 at 9:34 PM

Storyline: City Services RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Sacramento’s city and county governments are considering consolidating some of their services to save money as they wrestle with tough budgets. The City Council and Board of Supervisors will discuss the idea at their public meetings Tuesday.

Combining services could help local governments save money in the long term, said Gus Vina, assistant city manager. It also could cut redundancies, Vina said, noting that the city and county offer several similar services. For example, the county and city both provide animal control and code enforcement services, he said.

The city and county have not yet selected which services to combine. At this point, city and county officials are asking elected representatives if there is a “thumbs-up” for staff to pursue the idea, Vina said.

If the City Council supports it, city staff would choose services that could be combined, according to a report Vina is presenting to the City Council on Tuesday. Staffers would analyze the issue over the next 90 days, and then bring their findings to the City Council, the report notes.

“We’ll evaluate services on both sides: what’s the benefit, what’s the downside,” Vina said. “We’re looking for things that are not that difficult to do.”

City Finance Director Leyne Milstein said that city staffers are not ready to provide numbers for next year’s financial picture. They still need to analyze third-quarter sales tax information. Milstein estimated in May that the city would face a $30 million deficit in the 2010/2011 fiscal year.

While she did not release specific figures Monday, she acknowledged that the picture could continue to be grim.

“Nothing has changed for the better since that estimate was out there,” Milstein said.

The county has faced a wrenching budget crisis over the past several months. Its $180 million gap last spring was followed by a $76 million shortfall in the summer.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

December 8, 2009 | 2:14 AM
This should have happened a long time ago. Lets get it done !
1 1
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 12:50 PM
WHY?
0 0
REPLY
edited on  December 8, 2009 | 4:22 PM
In theory, consolidation should produce economies of scale which allows cost savings to be achieved – average costs are reduced when spread out over a wider set of users. However, this isn't always the case when city and counties consolidate services, and costs can actually go up (previous studies on U.S. cities have shown this). There are a few reasons, including: labor intensive services (police, fire protection, etc.) that require replication from one neighborhood to the next may in fact result in diseconomies of scale, mergining personnel related costs, mergining service quality costs (“averaging up” effect may occur with service levels and standards for equipment & facilities), and one-time trasition costs (one time operating & capital expenses) that can add up.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  December 9, 2009 | 12:10 PM
SINCE WHEN HAS GOVERNMENT EVER SAVED MONEY?

Please name when...

The savings...if there were any, would be quickly spent in other areas.
2 0
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 9:09 AM
I cn't believe how much "government" goes on without notifying the constituency. todays the meeting, and I've heard nothing about it until this morning, and none of it from my county officials. consolidate services with the city? No thanks. City of Sac is way too liberal leaning and eager to tax the christ beejeezus out of its' citizenry to accomplish it. Plus city dwellers sat back and said little when their new illegal alien loving police chief spoke in support of illegal border crossers. If I wanted the city managing my government I wouldn't have moved to the county.. Consolidating services will just make it harder for me to effect any control on my government
0 0
REPLY
edited on  December 8, 2009 | 1:40 PM
wow, i think the move was to also help out the extemely deficit --we have no way to make ends meet-- county- seems they need more assistance than the city. Perhaps since the county made their bed the city should let them lay in it-- in poverty-- in the cold- I've gone to PLENTY of county supervisor hearings and I haven't seen too many county dwellers speaking out. Many services the county gives to the poor population is state mandated funding-- from the state-- not the county dwellers. And many low income community members give the money right back to the county through office of revenue reimbursement, court fees, work project fees..... it's a cycle-- give to the poor take back from the poor. Heck, some people just don't know how expensive it is to be poor. LOL. I don't know why I went there, I guess usually when I hear comments towards undocumented community members I also hear the same towards low income community members.....Never the less, I aplogize for joking - sometimes I use humor to find my way through an uncomfortable feeling but I see you feel strongly about not consolidating with the city and if it takes away from the county dwellers I wouldn't want you uncomfortable even if your post was uncomfortable for me. Sometimes it seems separate but equal exists everywhere I look. Everywhere I look it seems people want to separate themselves from other people, from the struggles of others and it seems the city and county of sacramento is not only deficit of money but deficit of love. Everywhere I look I see gang - like mentality, people divided by territories.... wow, it's so hard to fight a cause when people have to first fight and break down territories
0 0
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 11:36 AM
Next year Americans had better be on their guard against fraudulent voter registrations and the possibility of illegal immigrants voting in the 2010 Senate elections. Sen.Harry Reid (D-NV) comes up for re-election and if you didn't know already, the great state of Nevada is overwhelmed by foreign nationals of the illegal kind. Be aware that under current voting law, a--UTILITY BILL-- is officially identified as a legal document as identification in Nevada. In states that are heavily involved with illegal immigrants and the product of welfare fraud, Nevada and California specifically should be under the eye of the election authorities. As of now only contractors and subs are required to use E-Verify, which is very loosely audited. E-Verify must be enacted permanently as its success rate is progressively moving forward. E-Verify could be introduced to identify drivers license applicants, car registration, health care and even voter registrations. Then organizations that facilitate in suspicious activities would have a major obstacle to contend with, including fraudulent documentation.

During this ACORN controversy these two Western states have very large apportionment's of political illegal immigrant sympathizers and--MUST--be removed from their career seats. ACORN and its big brother SEIU. ACORN and SEIU are the lead organizations behind Health Care and Comprehensive Immigration Reform known in truth as AMNESTY, which is the principle entities aggressively shoving for the passage of these very serious issues. ACORN is better known for hiring people with questionable backgrounds, to be engaged in fraudulent voting registrations. Sen.Harry Reid, Speaker Pelosi can be attributed to the near destruction of E-Verify, the federal verification program that a growing number of nationwide employers are beginning to use. As a pro-illegal immigrant incumbent he must be ejected from his Senatorial seat, because he is directly involved in the 2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill.These are the worst of the worst with a grading of ( F ) - as according to NUMBERSUSA.

They have been adamant conspirators against any immigration enforcement and readily agreeable with another BLANKET AMNESTY. WE NEED TO MAKE EXAMPLES OF THEM AND THROW THE IDIOTS OUT OF OFFICE NEXT YEAR? These individuals are just part of the political conspirators who don't mind illegal aliens settling in our nation and stealing AMERICAN JOBS.
Bennet, Michael F. - (D - CO) ,Bennett, Robert F. - (R - UT),Dodd, Christopher J. - (D - CT),Feingold, Russell D. - (D - WI),Gillibrand, Kirsten E. - (D - NY),Inouye, Daniel K. - (D - HI),Leahy, Patrick J. - (D - VT),Lincoln, Blanche L. - (D - AR), Mikulski, Barbara A. - (D - MD), Murray, Patty - (D - WA), Reid, Harry - (D - NV), Schumer, Charles E. - (D - NY), (R - AL),Wyden, Ron - (D - OR),

Statement from Gov. Jim Gibbons "Our voting system is very simply the greatest in the world and is the basis of what makes this country great. The allegation that an organization that’s main purpose is to register new voters was doing so fraudulently is very troubling. I believe that requiring a photo ID to vote is a very reasonable protection for our voting system and should be enacted as law by the 2009 Legislature."

Those who believe in America’s survival, without OVERPOPULATION as stated by the US Census bureau better read facts at NUMBERSUSA not the lies spawned by open border entities. Those who want details of corruption in WASHINGTON and state government go to JUDICIAL WATCH. Overpopulation, traffic hell should go to CAPSWEB. Other sites of interest on Immigration enforcement is ALIPAC and AMERICAN PATROL. We the people have the ultimate power to throw out anti-sovereignty incumbent politicians. Call and command these do-nothings to--STOP--this facade at 202-224-3121.
2 1
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 12:50 PM
AMEN BROTHER!
2 0
REPLY
edited on  December 8, 2009 | 7:36 PM
wow, I would not assume that people are criminal minded and assume they'll vote illegally but heck I guess if it could happen in Florida (Bush campaign), I guess it could happen elsewhere I guess it beats the legal way boundaries are set up....................
0 0
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 6:05 PM
I'm curious Rhonda, and this is a serious question.

Why would the African American community support illegal immigration. Illegal aliens suck BILLIONS of dollars out of the social services system, education system, section 8 programs, and drive up the prices of low income housing....this leaves a much smaller piece of the pie for needy African Americans who were born here.
0 0
REPLY
December 8, 2009 | 7:32 PM
Jim, I can not speak for the African American community as a whole. I've heard some who are African American speak who do not speak for me. I'm sorry but you have asked the wrong person I can't and don't generalize. Their are people of all different ethnic backgrounds who are in need and use many social service programs,. Heck tonight at the city council session none of the homeless people which spoke were black but I know their are some black folks also without home. I attended another recent council sessions and seen black, white, latino homeless individuals speaking. (tonight their was a very impressive long hair bearded man who spoke - touched me so very much- the Mayor who stood in front of cameras for a step forward wasn't their standing in front of homeless community members tonight who had to take a step backwards again pleading for shelter.) Sorry, my mind drifted to the council session-

Back to the subject and your question when you have little you will share because you know what it is like to be without. I've seen homeless individuals of all different ethnic backgrounds share with one another, give what little they have to another homeless individual. I guess and it would be interesting if you were to go to homeless communities and ask them how they feel of undocumented residents. My guess is their is so much love in the homeless communities they even cold, without shelter would still embrace them. By the grace of God I am not without a home and I see undocumented residents supporting businesses, working, contributing......... and you are asking someone who doesn't have much and we are usually the ones who don't mind sharing. But I am sure you can find an African American who feels the exact way that you do. People with different views and people who are like-minded come in all colors. Thank you for asking me the question I learned something from thinkiing about my answer. I learned to look for love and it's always there.
0 0
REPLY
December 9, 2009 | 12:16 PM
Thanks Rhonda... I always respect your opinions. This is something that just baffles me.

If we did not provide BILLIONS of dollars in services to illegal immigrants, I think we would have plenty of money to house homeless Americans.

Americans cannot afford to feed and house the world. While I feel compassion for the plight of the worlds poor, we have to draw the line somewhere. Americans should come first in order of need, and right now our country is is serious need. If liberals want to help the poor of the world, god bless them, and feel free to do so. Just don't force the taxpayers at gunpoint to do it by taxing them.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background