STORYLINE Downtown Sacramento Proposals & Construction

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

A revised proposal by USA Hospitality, Inc. and their equity partners Consus Asset Management and Industrial General has been submitted for building a Marriott Renaissance Hotel at the corner of 8th & K Street. The new proposal includes a decrease in the number of hotel rooms from 409 to 300, and a decrease in the number of parking spaces from 372 to 350 while adding 100 condominiums on top of the parking garage as a second phase of the project. The total cost to build the project went up from $137 million to $162 million along with the needed city subsidy to build from $31.5 million to $33 million. The developer has asked that the city give them the land which is city-owned for free, and to forgive taxes on the hotel for the first few years of its operation as part of their needed subsidy deal.

The property has been tied up for 14 months in an "Exclusive Right to Negotiate" with USA Hospitality, Inc., but on December 8th the city staff will recommend releasing the Request for Qualifications for the 700 and 800 blocks of K Street with a due date of February 12, 2010. It’s anticipated that the city staff could return to the Redevelopment Agency by early April with several other proposals for the 8th & K Street site. In that time USA Hospitality must do three things.

1) Obtain stronger financial commitments from all equity financial partners.
2) Developer conduct an assessment of the Bel-Vue to determine the costs associated with preserving the façade.
3) Complete negotiated business terms for inclusion in Disposition and Development Agreement.

I still don’t see the value in the city giving away $33 million in land and future taxes when just two blocks up the street at 10th and K Street Toni Giannoni is asking for $10 million to build a 165-room hotel that better fits our market. Toni also has an excellent record of finishing projects downtown where there are more development regulations that can tie up a proposal. In the case of the 8th and K Street design, the developer has a half block to work with, so instead of a massive parking garage the parking should be spread out over the entire half block above the lobby and ground floor retail but below the hotel rooms like has been done with ten other high-rises in downtown. If the city can nudge the developer to do this sort of design instead, the proposal would actually be shorter but the curb appearance would be far nicer. We don’t need another 6 story car garage at the corner of 8th & L Street; car garages have a history of deadening side walk activity for entire blocks and devaluing distinctive corners in our city. I hope both our City Council and planners consider the consequences, there is no need to repeat mistakes of the past again.

(The photo above is a city owned parking garage across from City Hall at 10th & I Street)

Report to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

December 3, 2009 | 7:40 PM
Industrial General is a new partner in all this, they are based out of Las Vegas and they are run by someone named Theodor Bodnar. Not much else online about them...the name doesn't exactly explain much.

The staff report is, well, grim. It mentions that with the current financing there is still a $6 million funding gap, the project price does not include the construction costs for 100 condos that are supposed to go in at some unspecified future time, and both Consus and Industrial General have conditioned their approval on things that the city has already made pretty clear that it is unwilling or utterly unable to do--like issue bonds for the entire construction cost.

http://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=8&event_id=98&meta_id=188342

The plan makes no mention at all of the Bel-Vue, even though the city specifically said they had to estimate the costs of retaining the facade (which is a joke.)

A draft of the RFI (what they will send out if the hotel plan gets rejected) mentions the Bel-Vue, and its landmark status, but does not specify that the city wants the building to stay there.
1 0
REPLY
December 4, 2009 | 4:05 PM
Just to clarify something as well. USA Hospitality was asked to respond with the three requirements back in August and the Council directed staff to release an RFQ in 90 days if the following did not occur. The three issues have not been addressed and it's time to release the RFQ. USA Hospitality can continue to work with the city, however it is time to allow other qualified developers/development teams to chime in on the future of these key sites in the JKL Corridor.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background