STORYLINE City Services

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Council to decide on green waste bins

by Kathleen Haley, published on November 23, 2009 at 10:10 PM

Storyline: City Services RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The Sacramento City Council will decide Tuesday night whether to ask voters to use bins for their green waste.

In a 1977 initiative, Sacramento voters said the city could not establish the use of bins for residents’ green waste. If the city wants to enact bin use rules, it must ask voters to overturn the 1977 law, according to a new report from the Utilities Department.

However, residents in some areas of the city can choose bins instead of on-the-street pickup, according to the department. About 85,000 residents have chosen to use bins, the report notes.

The City Council meeting will be at City Hall, 915 I St., at 6 p.m.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

November 24, 2009 | 4:35 AM
For those who want to know more about the issue, check out http://www.sacbike.org/greenwaste/#Fact

Beyond the reason listed there as to why green waste should be placed in bins, as opposed to piled up in the street, the other reason is making the streets safer. With green waste piled in the bike lanes, cyclists are forced to take the lane of vehicular traffic in order to commute; and at night, even the brightest of bike lights does not give a cyclist enough notice of the debris which causes many cyclists to get into accidents.
0 0
REPLY
November 25, 2009 | 2:01 PM
So is it safer in Newton Booth and South Side where there are no parking restrictions and and the garbage and recycling cans are placed into the bike lanes on pick up days? Containerization will just create more bins standing in the bike lanes.

Repeatedly I see bikers blow through stop signs and red signal lights, ignore cars signaling to turn right at intersections, then running into the car or nearly so, zigzag back and forth across the street and ride as many as three abreast down the streets--one in the bike lane the rest in the street--riding after dark with no headlights or taillights. How safe are those reckless acts?
2 0
REPLY
November 24, 2009 | 3:50 PM
Not to mention the fact that this time of every year especially, all those leaves piled in the gutter clog the storm drains during the first significant downpour of the rainy season causing huge pools of water to collect in the intersections. On more than one occasion, I have had to don my foul weather gear and head out into the street in front of my home in the middle of a torrential storm with a rake to pull the leaves back from the storm drain. At times the water has gotten so deep my front lawn was covered and it was creeping up my driveway and about to flood my garage!
0 0
REPLY
edited on  November 26, 2009 | 9:17 PM
Is it is the raked up leaf stacks that are clogging the drains or is it the the unraked leaves in the
curbs that clog the drain? FYI, I would need about 4 green bins to put our leaves in.
0 0
REPLY
November 24, 2009 | 4:03 PM
The article states that 85,000 residents have chosen to use green waste bins. This isn't true. 85,000 residents didn't opt out and therefore received a bin whether or not they wanted it. I think there's a big difference.
3 0
REPLY
November 24, 2009 | 10:45 PM
Interesting how this item got agendized to be right after an item regarding bicycles on K St. Testimony was heard from bike advocates, SABA etc regarding Bikes on K...a posistion I fully support, however to facilitate testimony on the green waste issue, which SABA's Walt Siefert participated as a task force member...meanwhile central city residents barely, if at all, knew this was coming forward...It begs the question..whats the agenda here? Fortunately after numerous comments appeared attached to today's BEE "Claw" editorial-the item got pulled for further inclusive discussions and considerations to come to a more equitable resolve. Not to be reheard until at least mid January.

If you take the claw out of the picture-you set up the possibility of out sourcing for the garbage contract-since all trash is contained.

It's interesting that on 9/28 Norcal Waste Systems Inc via their Recolgy PAC contributed $7000 to SAG for the the SMI...

So here's the 49 Dollar question-Is the city going to give up on street sweeping parking enforcement...if the claw goes away? How much revenue does that one violation bring into the general fund annually?

Remember street sweeping is only occurring once every two months-but street-sweeping enforcement happens to coincide with trash PU and Claw day (including holidays)...where it is enforced...cars don't need to move anywhere else in the city on trash pick up day or street sweeping...so take away parking enforcement & guess where the bins are all going...out into the street and bike lanes.
3 0
REPLY
November 25, 2009 | 12:28 AM
I plugged Sac Press at the City Council meeting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7TOBotn76w
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background