<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title type="text">Conversation on The Sacramento Press about: Full time City Council? Members weigh in on idea</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958" />
  <subtitle>Two members like the idea. Two are opposed. A fifth thinks it’s not a high priority.

These five members of the Sacramento City Council gave their views Thursday on a recommendation from an advisory group to make the council positions full time. The City Council has nine members because it includes the mayor. Currently, eight City Council positions are part time, while the mayor serves full time.

Councilmembers earn $52,000 per year.

The full-time recommendation comes from the city’s Charter...</subtitle>
  <dc:creator>KathleenHaley</dc:creator>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: Jim Knapp</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958/Full_time_City_Council_Members_weigh_in_on_idea" />
    <author>
      <name>Jim Knapp</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-23T03:39:52Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-23T03:39:52Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Fixation:      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_(psychology)

OCD:           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive_compulsive_disorder</summary>
    <dc:creator>Jim Knapp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-23T03:39:52Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: StevieGee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958/Full_time_City_Council_Members_weigh_in_on_idea" />
    <author>
      <name>StevieGee</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-21T05:20:01Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-21T05:20:01Z</published>
    <summary type="text">If the mayor gets his way we won't even need the counsel at all.  Just him and his lackeys will be running everything.</summary>
    <dc:creator>StevieGee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-21T05:20:01Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: bbbbmer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958/Full_time_City_Council_Members_weigh_in_on_idea" />
    <author>
      <name>bbbbmer</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-20T17:20:33Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-20T17:20:33Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Only to KJ and his staff of suckups, sycophants, and siblings... oh, and his backers...</summary>
    <dc:creator>bbbbmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T17:20:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: Priscilla Barnes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958/Full_time_City_Council_Members_weigh_in_on_idea" />
    <author>
      <name>Priscilla Barnes</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-20T16:41:09Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-20T16:41:09Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Ray Tretheway's statement, "a full-time City Council is a second-tier issue" seems sensible.  Might a Strong Mayor be a first-tier issue?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Priscilla Barnes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T16:41:09Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: bbbbmer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/17958/Full_time_City_Council_Members_weigh_in_on_idea" />
    <author>
      <name>bbbbmer</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-20T10:21:25Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-20T10:21:25Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Those members who actually work at their elected office on a full-time basis, and that is probably most of them, should indeed be compensated for a full-time commitment...</summary>
    <dc:creator>bbbbmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T10:21:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

