STORYLINE Save the River - Stop the Fence

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Stop the proposed Levee Fence

by Michael Stavros, published on November 15, 2009 at 11:19PM

No high resolution image exists...

Loading images

 The American River is surely one of Sacramento’s most precious resources and access to the river beaches and trails is under attack. The River Park Neighborhood Association is trying to slip through a proposal to construct a fence along the levee at Glenn Hall Park, designed to shut off access to the river from dusk to sunrise.

The plan to construct a tubular steel fence with an “exit only” turnstile (similar to the one at the Sacramento Zoo) is part of a proposal to spend money set aside for capital improvements for the River Park, East Sacramento, and Campus Commons neighborhoods.

Opponents call the fence proposal an extreme, over-reaction to problems that occurred during the summer months, such as noise, drinking, littering, and unsafe driving on Carlson Drive. In the warm weather, Paradise Beach becomes a popular spot for sun bathers, swimmers and partiers.

The River Park Review printed some letters from River Park residents. Here are some quotes that exemplify some of the concerns:

“For years the Paradise Beach area has been a trouble spot for River Park. The activities at the beach have caused an increase in crime, vandalism and drunk driving in our neighborhood … By building a fence across the entire levee there is the opportunity to curb reckless behavior”

“For those that don’t live in close proximity to the park, you may not have experienced people driving across your lawn, urinating in your front yard, gunshots outside your window, or a gang fight across the street, but these activities are par for the course in Glenn Hall Park. These issues are directly related to the lack of lighting and security in the park.”

Opponents charge that the “crime problems” have been greatly exaggerated and that the proposed fence will not do little to address the few problems that do exist.

For example, a levee barricade will not solve the problem of people urinating or driving across someone’s lawn –– unless they put the fence around the entire neighborhood. As far as “gunshots” and “gang fights” – this is certainly not the norm in the River Park neighborhood as the police reports confirm.

As City Park Ranger Greg Narramore stated at the River Park Neighborhood Association meeting on April 18, 2009 “River Park is still one of the most crime free neighborhoods in Sacramento.”

It’s true that people drink at the beach in the summer weekends and some drive drunk through the neighborhood – but most of the partying takes place during the day. The way to solve a drunk driving problem is to enforce the law already in place. The fence proposal punishes us all for the sins of a few.

Aside from being an eye sore along the beautiful levee, the fence proposal uses up resources that could be used for more productive capital improvements, and it would set a bad prescient for all the other river access points. No specific neighborhood should be allowed to control the river or the river access.

At the recent RPNA meeting on November7, 2009 I raised a proposal to form a committee to explore alternative solutions such as: random police patrols, perhaps a life guard to keep order at the beach (and maybe save a life in the process), perhaps an attendant at the parking lot to stop the people from bringing alcohol down to the river. No committee was formed.

Although most people in the area have not yet been properly informed, the River Park Neighborhood Association plans to hold a meeting to decide on this issue. The meeting will take place on Thursday, November 19, 2009 at the Fremont Presbyterian Church at 5770 Carlson Drive (Geneva Room). The meeting will start at 7:30 PM. All residents of Sacramento and the surrounding area are welcome to come and voice their opinion. This decision effects the entire city.

You may also express your opinion by contacting the office of City Councilman, Steve Cohn.
Phone: 916-808-7003
e-mail: scohn@cityofsacramento.org

Please help us stop this proposed river barricade.

Michael Stavros
River Park Resident for19 years

 

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.

edited on  November 16, 2009 | 11:16 AM
The solutions you propose to the notion of a hideous gate on the levee all involve staff funding that the city and county do not have. The park and river access are already technically closed from dusk to dawn. A fence is not the answer.

Sacramento needs perpetual funding for maintenance of the American River Parkway.
3 0
REPLY
November 16, 2009 | 05:10 PM
An Ugly Fence is a rotten idea!
0 0
REPLY
November 16, 2009 | 08:30 PM
I am a River Park resident and a Landscape Architect and agree that this fence would not only visually intrude upon the beauty of the American River Parkway, it really will do little to solve the problems identified. Enforcement of existing laws, rather than spending precious resources upon a visual eyesore is the answer here. Homes in River Park are distinguished by not having bars on their windows. Please don't put bars on the American River Parkway.
1 0
REPLY
November 16, 2009 | 10:24 PM
Good comment. And perhaps the vigilant RP neighborhood watch folks can help monitor the specific problematic behavior.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  November 16, 2009 | 10:11 PM
Those problems listed by fence advocates sound like what central city folks experience regularly from inebriates leaving the bars (maybe some from River Park?) and street people roaming the streets. Have you been told "that's what you get for living along the river parkway and levee"? Central city folks are told, "that's what you get for living in the central city."

RP, you have been fortunate to be isolated for so long, now welcome to today's real world.
3 0
REPLY
November 20, 2009 | 01:08 AM
UPDATE: We stopped the proposed levee fence! We overwhelmed them with our mass presence and petition signatures.

Actually, River Park Neighborhood Association Board president, Jeff Harris started the meeting with an announcement. Apparently he had received a call just a few hours earlier, informing him that the proposed Levee fence did not and could not meet the requirements of the American Disabilities Act, so the proposal is dead.

The River Park Neighborhood Association clearly didn't do their homework. They missed the ADA requirements, the Flood Control regulations, the CA State Land Commission rules and most importantly, they totally miscalculated the will of the neighborhood. Tonight we demonstrated our strong opposition to the plan. For the many of us that showed up, the sweet taste of victory came with a cost. They stole our thunder - we were prepared to make a solid case against the levee fence proposal.

I am thankful to all who participated in this brief, but successful, grass roots movement. Hopefully, the experience has made us all pay attention just a little bit more.
This is what democracy looks like.

0 0
REPLY
December 1, 2009 | 09:30 AM
Go Michael!!! I completely agree with your point of view!! I think $400,000 can be put to better use than a useless fence - we had trouble keeping the pool open this summer - this money can be put to better use. AND is it just me, or is this RPNA getting out of control with some issues...
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
TYPE YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW
EDIT YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW cancel edit

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Forgot Password?
New Users Create an Account Here
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com