STORYLINE Alleys

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Pilot alley condos move forward

by Suzanne Hurt, published on October 22, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Storyline: Alleys RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

A prototype condo building will be constructed on a Midtown alley after approval by the city earlier this month.

The Planning Division of the Sacramento Community Development Department granted a parking waiver and a side yard variance on Oct. 8 for a pilot alley residential project known as "Stitch" when developer Jeremy Drucker worked out compromises to address nearby residents' concerns.

"The biggest concern was how heavily that block is impacted for parking," said Drucker, who previously developed 9 on F, the central city's first residential project certified by the U.S. Green Building Council for its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Drucker made his comments Thursday at meeting of the Alley Activation Committee.

Drucker's newest "green" building will contain three condos and a garage at the back of a deep lot that is behind a house at 1717 Capitol Ave. The architect is Ron Vrilakas.

The residential units would face Old Soul coffee roastery, which also sits on the alley that runs from 17th to 18th streets, between L Street and Capitol Avenue. That's one of three alleys where property owners are currently proposing pilot alley projects.

Drucker is helping to lead an "alley movement" in Sacramento. Some people involved in a so-called alley activation effort have expressed interest in potential retail and other uses. Drucker said his goal is to add housing that builds density in Midtown without demolishing historic architecture, and to do so at a cost that keeps young people from being priced out of the housing market.

"These old homes are expensive," Drucker said. "They're often more than most people can afford — from a purchase standpoint and even maintaining the properties."

Expected to open in May, the Stitch building will be used as a sales model for three years, after which time the units will be sold, Drucker said.

The back of the lot had been used as parking for eight cars belonging to people who worked for restaurateur Ernesto Jimenez, who uses the house as an office, or at his restaurant Zocalo, at 1801 Capitol Ave. Jimenez also owns Ernesto's Mexican Food, at S and 16th streets.

Neighbors already cramped on parking in the bustling Handle District were worried about the elimination of the eight spaces and an agreement to allow Jimenez or an employee to park in one of the prototype garage's three spaces.

Drucker has agreed to rent a parking space in a nearby lot for one tenant. He also will provide a one-year public transit pass to that tenant, who will live in a ground floor unit accessible for the disabled.

The city also granted a variance allowing a side yard, which will be used for a courtyard entrance, to measure 5 feet 6 inches instead of the standard 10 feet, Drucker said.

Suzanne Hurt is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 23, 2009 | 1:10 PM
Just as a suggestion, it would be helpful to provide pictures or drawings when posting an article about proposed structures... I know *I* just love to look at pretty pictures and architectural drawings...
3 0
REPLY
October 23, 2009 | 8:23 PM
these aren't so pretty - you probably don't want to know what these will look like.
4 0
REPLY
October 24, 2009 | 5:57 AM
i think they look nice enough for what they are. The "classic" is boring, but well, he has to appease those stuck in this, "lets build like its 1912 even thought its 2009", anyways, i guess i just come from the school of thought - that the past is just a spring board to the next step. (architecturally speaking). but im clearly out numbered - so ill just keep this radical thought to myself, well and here. i digress.
1 1
REPLY
October 24, 2009 | 6:55 AM
They couldn't be worse than the townhouses that AKT threw up (literally) at 21st and S or so -- they're the prime example of unsaleability due to aesthetics rather than the mortgage meltdown... Hideous!
2 0
REPLY
edited on  October 24, 2009 | 7:33 PM
Agreed bbbmmer - lots of infill in Midtown is crap but there are some well done projects. To another commenter, at no point was it said they have to match early 20th Century architecture but compatibility with the existing architecture is a huge issue. Many cities have figured out how to do pretty well. Why can't we? I have seen the renderings and some are ok, but as with most infill, it is uninspired. Because these structures are likely going up in traditional neighborhoods and in some cases historic districts, we deserve better.
2 0
REPLY
October 26, 2009 | 12:23 PM
A rendering of this project can be seen here:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2760/4046895647_049679e14a.jpg

It can also be seen in the first story in the "Alleys" storyline, published Aug. 2:
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/11502/Alley_renaissance_envisioned

and a second story published Aug. 8:
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/11615/Pilot_alley_projects_to_council_Tuesday
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background