Tag Cloud
Mayor Kevin Johnson has put it to the owners of the troubled Westfield Downtown Plaza: Either you're in or you're out.
The company, Westfield Group, has only another month or so to tell the city whether it will invest in its downtown Sacramento mall the way it's investing in Westfield Galleria at Roseville, Johnson told Westfield representatives and downtown business owners Monday.
"If not, we need you to not hold our city hostage anymore. We need you to sell and let the city move forward," he said. "In November or so, we need you to realize if you're in, you're in. If you're not, you're not."
For at least 11 years, the city has been negotiating over Downtown Plaza with Westfield, perhaps the world's largest shopping mall owner with more than $47 billion in investments in 119 shopping centers. In 2006, Westfield proposed a $120 million overhaul of Downtown Plaza. In May, the company postponed those plans for at least the rest of the year, while completing its $120 million reinvestment at Westfield Santa Anita in Southern California's Arcadia.
The mayor has been pressing Westfield for investment since at least August, when the company also backed out of a planned $200 million renovation of North County Mall in Escondido.
In a meeting at Cosmopolitan Cabaret Monday, Johnson said he and other city leaders are currently engaged in meetings with Westfield Group to determine whether they can make the current partnership work, or whether Westfield should sell the mall to the city or developers from Sacramento or beyond.
The mayor delivered the ultimatum during the first of two community meetings dubbed "Unlocking the Grid" that he's holding as the city works on a new strategy for K Street Mall and the downtown core. More than 100 business and property owners and others took part in the first meeting. Next Monday, Johnson plans to meet with people who live, work or visit downtown at 5:30 p.m. at the cabaret, 10th and K streets.
At the meeting's start, Johnson took a look back at decisions made in the last 50 years that cut off key streets and areas like Old Sacramento and the Sacramento River: the widening of Capitol Mall in the 1950s, the construction of I-5 and removing cars from K Street in the 1960s, construction of the suburban-style Downtown Plaza and Sacramento Convention Center in the 1970s, light rail construction in the 1980s, and tripling the size of the convention center in the 1990s.
Johnson encouraged participants to consider all of the city's assets while coming up with big-picture ideas to improve downtown and reconnect all its parts. Every decision impacts what the city will become, he said.
"We have to create an environment where all boats are rising," he said. "I don't want us to fall into doing the easiest thing to do."
Problems with safety and cleanliness were at the forefront for many. K Street Mall is plagued with "bums, lunatics, thugs and drug dealers," and the city should have a "visible police presence" on K Street until 2 a.m., said Gene Barton, who owns Marilyn's nightclub, 908 K St.
"No one's patrolling alleys. No one's down there after dark," he said.
Hannah Brantingham, the 27-year-old operations manager for 24 Hour Fitness on Seventh Street, said she didn't feel safe walking three blocks down K Street Mall to the afternoon meeting. She's concerned about the safety of employees who walk from a dirty yet expensive parking garage and about cars being stolen or burglarized there.
Another participant asked whether the city would relocate "SRO" hotels, cheap hotels providing single room occupancy on and around the mall.
The SROs have been a problem for "too long," said Johnson, who added, without going into specifics, that he's committed to not having SROs be an impediment to Westfield or other business owners.
The city should focus first on building a mass transit system to carry more people downtown, which would encourage development, said developer David Taylor.
Light rail to Davis could make it easier for UC Davis's 30,000 students to party, shop or eat downtown, said Steve Ayers, a developer and local steel company executive.
Plenty of talk revolved around how to bring more business, housing and spenders downtown. Some people suggested downtown — via retailers and restaurants — must stay open later to increase safety and make the area a more desirable place to be.
Sean Kohmescher said he keeps his Temple coffee and teahouse at 1014 10th St. open until 11 p.m., even though he loses money doing so, because that supports the kind of city he wants to live in. He suggested more business owners "take it upon themselves to create that."
While some were focused on bringing more "high-end" boutiques, restaurants and housing downtown, Kohmescher and others said the key is to have businesses that students and residents with middle-class or fixed incomes will use regularly.
Midtown works better than downtown because it has "mid-level" options, said Brook Taylor, a young professional who works in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
The city should focus on serving the needs of "folks in the middle" who provide a steady stream of business to the city, he said.
Suzanne Hurt is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.
Midtown works because those much maligned people who live there, work and have worked since Taylor was in diapers in spite of city opposition and all other odds against them, to keep midtown's architecture preserved and its quality of life livable to attract other residents and businesses. He should put that in his planning and research.
The SROs have been home to many folks with very low income. Where does the Mayor think they will live if the SROs are no longer around? Maybe they can go live in the tent city he's so fond of.
How can someone see that and expect people to be able to afford anything that is that out of reach? We have studios in midtown and downtown that are so ridiculously overprices it's laughable. $1100 for a 500 sq ft apartment. Are they serious? I saw a 2 bedroom 2 bath apartment that was running $2800. We need housing that meets the markets needs and attracts more people here. Most of the housing at these high prices are ending up with large amounts of vacancies. Which is better to make $4 or 500 less each month, or to have an apartment vacant for 3/4 of the year?
Of course, technically $1000 for a studio apartment counts as "low-income housing"--LI housing means a unit affordable to someone making 80% of the area median income, which as of this year is around $40,000 (average income in Sacramento County is around $50,000.) Someone making $40K, according to low-income housing rules, should be able to pay about one-third of their income towards rent--or about $1000. I think the units at 1801 are part "low-income" and part "very low income" housing--with rents of around $600-700, intended for people making 60% of area median income, or around $25-30,000 a year.
I know a number of people living at 1801, at 16th and H, Capital Towers and a few other places. The people I know that live at these places often have roommates. Without the roommates they couldn't afford the housing. Even if their vacancies are relatively low, the occupancy is around 2 to 3 times what it would be expected to be for most apartments of the same size normally. I think if they made more affordable housing, such as what bill stated, 2 bedrooms for $1000 is right on par with what they should run. It's ridiculous to assume that most working people can afford these overpriced places.
The funny thing is that the one neighborhood in San Francisco where there are still a lot of SROs is adjacent to Union Square, San Francisco's shopping district and location of many upscale hotels. Somehow, SROs are okay there but not here. One major difference is that San Francisco does NOT think of Union Square as a shopping mall--although it sounds like KJ learned that you still need to keep an eye on your bag in that part of town!
I would love to see K Street and its side streets catch up to the 21st Century because I see great potential for advancement there. But realistically, there needs to be focus on the non wealthy folks that already live and shop whats left of the area's reatail. They are the people who shop Walmart, The 99cents Only Stores, Big Lots and K-Mart. Its nice to dream of an upscale 'Beverly Sacramento Hills'. But come on... I seriously doubt that the people who work downtown and live in Folsom, Eldorado Hills or Roseville will be leaving their neighborhoods, filled with perfectly fine shoping areas, to return and shop in the depressing blight of postered up K-Street, filled with hoodrats and homeless hustlers, no matter how may Mason's or Morton's type diners open.