STORYLINE Sacramento Midtown

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Local production of “ATWATER Fixin’ to Die"

by Dale Kooyman, published on October 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Storyline: Sacramento Midtown RSS Feed
Community Tags culture

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

 If anyone wonders, as I have, why and how issues in local and other political campaign matter less now than digging up dirt about an opponent, they will find their answer when they see “ATWATER Fixin’ to Die, now playing in the Three Penny Theater—a California Stage at 1745 25th Street.

Author Robert Myers capsules the history of Southerner Harvey Leroy Atwater, the man who diverted the focus of political campaigns from discussing serious issues facing voters locally and nationally to uncovering, distorting and publicizing a candidate’s personal characteristics with no relevance to the qualifications for the job. Atwater’s unethical campaign management strategy vilified and twisted those characteristics subjectively into a fatal personality flaw to persuade gullible voters to rally behind the candidate for whom he was working.

He first practiced his unprincipled techniques successfully at the local level in a Southern state’s election rising to near perfection as the power behind the defeat of presidential candidate, Michael Dukakis. Under the direction of Vada Russell, Eric Baldwin, star of the one-man show, brings the late Atwater back to life for brief 90 minutes.

A director “note” in the play’s program sets theatre goers to thinking. She asks them a “What if . . . ? Ronald Wilson Reagan had never been elected President? George H.W. Bush had never been elected President? Karl Rove had never been inspired to be come a modern day Machiavelli?”

I would add a couple more.   Would President Obama’s critics feel so comfortable and justified in engaging in their despicable tactics to oppose and discredit his every move while piously claiming no racial prejudice guilt as Atwater did?  Would Dick Armey's orchestrated "Tea Party" participants who stood outside our capitol building here in Sacramento have carried signs displaying such distorted messages?   

The Director goes on, “Would the outbreak of AIDS in the early 80’s have been allowed to spread unchecked? Would the Iron Curtain have fallen when it did? Would we have had the first Gulf War? The second? Would George W. Bush have become Governor of Texas let alone the 43rd President of the United States?”

“Ladies and Gentlemen, put your hands together for Harvey Leroy Atwater. Welcome to his particular brand of politics, where grown men behave like adolescence boys brimful of energy and testosterone, soaked with wet dreams of power locked and loaded with desire to win . . . no matter what the cost--sound familiar?"

I suggest seeing the play to judge for yourself how his tactics have affected us locally and nationally.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  October 12, 2009 | 5:32 PM
“Would the outbreak of AIDS in the early 80’s have been allowed to spread unchecked?

Yeah blame that on Atwater LOL Dale...seriously...have you lost it completely?


I miss Lee Atwater... he would have taken out Obama in the Primaries.
0 3
REPLY
October 12, 2009 | 8:19 PM
If you read carefully, that is a question that the director is asking the theatre goers to ponder--not my question. It was Reagan who took no action then re: AIDS. Atwater was a big player in the Reagan win.

I'm not surprised that you would "miss" a man who admits on his dying bed that he was consumed with power at any cost and apologized to those whom he hurt because he was afraid he might go to Hell if he did not make amends. Yes, he probably would have demonized two individuals like Obama and his wife who came from poverty, were instilled with the value of education and hard work values, excelled in school and college and realized the American Dream. Had they been Republican he would have praised them, but they were fatally flawed for being Democrats.

See the play and quarrel with history and playwright-not me.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  October 13, 2009 | 9:18 AM
Atwater was no different than any other campaign consultant.

NONE of them have values or ethical standards... they only work within the scope of the law, and not by choice, and what they believe their target market will be able to stomach.

1 0
REPLY
October 12, 2009 | 10:05 PM
Yeah, Jim I agree that your remarks about the critic are totally uncalled for. (unless of course, you like negative attention by doing exactly what Atwater did ) I say Jimbo see the play and then respond to the issue not the messenger.
Susan Pikowsky
4 0
REPLY
jwt
Author thumbnail
October 13, 2009 | 8:49 AM
See the play, Jim, check the history. Be an informed critic instead of a reactionary Replubican!
You can do it. Even Lee Atwater saw the error of his ways.
Jeanette Trimble
2 0
REPLY
edited on  October 13, 2009 | 3:14 PM
I am no Republican, I detest most of them. I know the history quite well...it is old boring news, unworthy of a play, only serves to make Leftists feel good about themselves, and illustrates the transparent double standards held by them. Bemoaning a man, simply because he worked for Bush is typical Neo-Liberal drivel, and quite boring.

I respect Atwater because he was good at his game.

I could write articles upon articles on the unethical strategies or outright lies of Democratic campaign consultants...Many right here in River City, but that would be an exercise in futility because the Left owns the public votes in this town, and they are more than willing to overlook the transgressions of their candidates and/or their campaign team.

If the American people are dumb enough to vote for a candidate based on campaign rhetoric, then they deserve the leadership they get.
0 1
REPLY
October 13, 2009 | 10:04 AM
"good at his game." Jim, Countless murderers and terrorists have been good at their "game" too. You respect them too apparently. So you are saying that it was "dumb" of people to listen to the rhetoric that elected Reagan twice, Bush and Bush II twice because it was those techniques that got them elected. That I might agree with you on. Still it is a bit of twisted logic you spout--or maybe words of a bitter person. Incidentally, you may not consider yourself a Republican, but you sure sound like one.
2 0
REPLY
October 13, 2009 | 10:50 AM
So you put Lee Atwater in the same league as murderers or terrorists?

I sound like a Republican because i don't believe in what the Left has to offer either? LOL your skirt is showing.

1 1
REPLY
edited on  October 13, 2009 | 9:09 PM
There goes your twisted thinking again although deaths did result from those adopting his campaign tactics to elect Bush II. The point is that being good at a game is not necessarily a skill to be admired or respected. In his case the game was winning at all costs with a long line of victims maligned and damaged unjustly.
1 0
REPLY
October 16, 2009 | 11:54 AM
Near his death, Lee Atwater apologized for his sins, and there were many. Many Republicans do see the error of their ways as they prepare to meet their maker. In his heyday he harmed people by his actions that started America on a path of ruin. He died an agonizing death. 'Nuff said...
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background