STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Councilmembers voice concerns over Nestle bottling plant

by Kathleen Haley, published on September 30, 2009 at 8:47 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Two Sacramento city councilmembers are raising concerns and voicing skepticism about the Nestle company’s plan to set up a plant to bottle and sell water from the American River.

Councilmembers Kevin McCarty and Lauren Hammond are advocating for the City Council to get involved in the city’s negotiations with Nestle, which so far have been managed by city staffers.

Nestle Waters North America’s plan to set up shop in Sacramento early next year is drawing attention. A group of citizens created "Save Our Water Sacramento" to oppose Nestle’s plans. The group is calling for the City Council to set a moratorium on beverage bottling plants in Sacramento.

The company noted in a statement that it plans to start operations by bottling 30 million gallons of Sacramento water annually at a Florin/Fruitridge industrial park site. Nestle would buy the water from the city on a yearly basis. But a city staff memo dated Sept. 14 points out a different figure — it says the Nestle plant would use 81 million gallons, or 250-acre-feet of water annually.

McCarty said he is concerned about the project’s environmental impacts and said the proposal sounds like a “sweetheart deal.” He criticized city staff for giving him a “weak response” on the project’s details. He said he’s now going to engage in “further exploration to get to the bottom of this,” adding that he wants to have a thoughtful discussion on whether the project makes sense.

Hammond has also entered the debate, saying that city staffers need to look to the City Council for public policy direction before entering into an agreement with Nestle.

Hammond and McCarty are running against each other for Assemblyman Dave Jones’ seat in 2010.

A Sept. 14 memo from Utilities Department Director Marty Hanneman notes that Nestle’s planned use of 81 million gallons per year is “less than .2 percent of the city’s current demands.” Hanneman said the project does not fall under California Environmental Quality Act requirements.

Assistant City Manager John Dangberg responded to McCarty's criticism, saying that Nestle is not obtaining special water rates from the city. The company would pay the same water rates as any other water user in Sacramento, he said. The company is also going through the permitting process with the same requirements that other entities face, and is not receiving special incentives, Dangberg noted.

The company's proposal meets conditions under city requirements that allow it to apply for a building permit without going through the City Council or the Planning Commission, he said.

Meanwhile, Chris Kemp, Sacramento Plant Manager for Nestle Waters North America, said the company is taking all legally required steps in setting up its plant.

“We look forward to working with the members of the city council to provide them with information about our company and operations as we become an employer and neighbor in the Sacramento community,” Kemp said. "We are complying fully with the permitting requirements of the appropriate city, state and federal governmental authorities.”

Kemp said the public is invited to ask questions about the project at the “Ask Us” section on its website.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Staff Reporter Suzanne Hurt contributed to this report.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 30, 2009 | 8:53 PM
Photo by Anthony Bento.
0 0
REPLY
September 30, 2009 | 10:36 PM
I guess if you are a city council member and are running for higher office.. you would have some difficulty pointing to anything you accomplished on the Council... so lets go after Nestle... they sound big and they are probably even foreign... and maybe they don't have any 'persons of color' on their board...

With everything this city is facing this is where these two draw the line in the sand???
1 1
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 12:50 AM
Thank you to both Councilmembers addressing this and to SacPress for hosting the recent story.

Nestle is not proposing to be a "water user," they are "using" Sacramento's American River water as their product.

The City of Sacramento's language is very weak. Another end run around public input on crucial matters.
5 0
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 10:41 AM
Yeah. I think that needs to be pointed out. A number of people have said, in other articles, that they will be paying the same rate that all businesses in the Sacramento area pay. The difference is that those other businesses RENT the water. The water, even if a slightly smaller percentage, ends up back in our waterways.

However, we are known for our droughts, and given that fact, do we really want a company here who is taking the water supply and sending it elsewhere? Never to remotely re-enter our water system?
5 0
REPLY
edited on  October 4, 2009 | 8:31 AM

NO NEWS HERE....

The City's staff really runs this town, they always have. They control all information that the Council is allowed to see.

Council members only get involved in any issue that will bring them press.

Why do industrial users pay far far less for water than households? Why are residential customers forced at gunpoint to subsidize big business, again and again? The Council should ensure equity of water rates, but they wont.

Will Nestle pay a living wage? What is the bottom line dollar figure this company will bring our City?

Will the City retain the right to turn off the water in times of drought?

Bottled water is a contributor to our carbon footprint. How does this plant create sustainability in Sacramento? Does it violate the City's sustainability measures?


0 0
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 11:54 AM
"A group of citizens created "Save Our Water Sacramento" to oppose Nestle’s plans. The group is calling for the City Council to set a moratorium on beverage bottling plants in Sacramento."

Link to the "Save Our Water Sacramento" in the article.
0 0
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 12:02 PM
Great story, Kathleen.
0 0
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 12:49 PM
Thanks, Suzanne!
0 0
REPLY
October 1, 2009 | 12:42 PM
See the movie "Flow". Water is the next highly controlled resource.
0 0
REPLY
TAB
Author thumbnail
October 1, 2009 | 8:55 PM
Not only controlled but pollutors as well. As i recall Nestles one of the pollutors at their bottle water plant in the us in the film "Flow"
0 0
REPLY
October 3, 2009 | 1:54 PM
If you'd like to see Nestle's underhanded and deceptive tactics and practices in action, please view the documentary 'Flow: For the Love of Water' on the company's water re-packaging operations around the world, including in the U.S... Absolutely frightening....
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background