Tag Cloud
As a response to a $72 million shortfall, Sacramento County officials proposed on September 16 an over $1 million funding reduction to In Home Support Services (IHSS), a program that provides home care for the disabled and elderly. According to the county proposal, the reduction, "will leave [IHSS] with 52 case-carrying social workers for over 21,000 cases."
The $1 million cut would only save the county roughly $490,000. The remainder of the lost funds would come from the elimination of $515,000 in attached federal monies.
According to Laura McCasland, Communications Officer at the Sacramento County Deptartment of Health and Human Services, a last-minute infusion of state resources has restored the federal monies and likely saved IHSS from dramatic cuts, although reductions will leave the program with less than 63 positions to oversee 21,000 cases.
The IHSS program compensates caregivers with an hourly wage -- $10.40 per hour in Sacramento County -- for providing home care to disabled and elderly persons. The purpose of the program is to help vulnerable Californians remain safely in their homes while saving resources that may otherwise be spent on institutional care.
According to the California Department of Social Services, "Nearly 60 percent of IHSS providers are family members of recipients."
Some, including Governor Schwarzenegger, have argued that IHSS is rife with abuse, a claim that has been substantiated by a March 23 Sacramento County grand jury report.
The grand jury found that, "At its best, [IHSS] is a dysfunctional system plagued by upper management who refuse to make meaningful changes or even look into matters that will be beneficial to the truly needy people [IHSS] is pledged to support. ... The lack of fiscal controls and oversight at IHSS has made it an easy target for those who are greedy."
The grand jury report has led to the creation of a multi-agency District Attorney task force that is currently investigating fraud at IHSS.
Supporters of IHSS, however, are suspicious of the grand jury's claims. "Have you ever seen anyone being prosecuted for fraud? No. Where are the prosecutions if there is fraud?" said Human Services Specialist George Raya, in an interview with the Sacramento Press.
Official statewide investigations into IHSS have been generally supportive of the program.
Earlier this year, allegations of IHSS misuse prompted the California State Senate to order the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes (SOOO) to examine the program. On March 24, SOOO issued its report on IHSS, which found strong, but qualified, support for the program. While the report did criticize the program's inability to verify timesheets completed by caregivers, the report "found general consensus that [IHSS] saves taxpayers money in nursing home costs and improves the lives of its vulnerable beneficiaries."
In the July budget revision, the state government reduced funding for the program by $263.5 million. These reductions, which were a response to a $62 billion state deficit, will "limit the provision of IHSS services to the neediest consumers," according to a California state budget report issued by the Governor's office.
Responding to program criticism, budget-related changes include the implementation of "rigorous anti-fraud efforts," according to the report. They will require that all providers attend an orientation and be fingerprinted and subject caregivers to civil penalties if they falsify timesheets.
The California Department of Social Services reports that on Nov. 1, program reductions will result in 36,000 individuals currently covered by IHSS losing care coverage while approximately 97,000 see a reduction in care.
IHSS's future is uncertain, as it is largely tied to the status of California's state and county budgets, but supporters argue that cuts to the program create greater societal costs in the future. "It saves pennies, but it costs pounds later," said George Raya.
The Legislative Analyst's Office has reached a similar conclusion. A report issued by the organization on April 14, 2008 found that the IHSS program costs $12,406 per enrollee, while the comparable cost of a Medi-Cal skilled nursing facility was $57,182.
There is little evidence that the IHSS worker is leaving a full time job to take care of an elderly relative. It most cases the family seems to be watching the clock and as soon a grandma hits the magic age... they get themselves hired.
It smacks of welfare. Meanwhile, genuinely needy elderly are left to vend for themselves or drift with inadequate support.
It did no such thing. The Grand Jury report, like the governor's statements, was heavy on heated remarks but lacked actual statistical proof to back up the claim of widespread fraud. It's also relevant that district attorneys help guide the "findings" of Grand Juries. Since Sacramento County DA Jan Scully is a vocal supporter of the governor's so-called "anti-fraud" campaign, it isn't surprising that her Grand Jury came out with such a report.
Every piece of documented statistical evidence we've seen shows the actual rate of IHSS fraud to be no more than one to two percent. Now any instance of such fraud is wrong and should be investigated and punished. But that doesn't make it riight for the governor and Ms. Scully, among others, to brand hundreds of thousands of our most vulnerable citizens and the people who serve them as fraud criminals.
Since I don't drive at all, should I decline to pay any road taxes and let all the actual drivers pool their resources to pay for roads? What a mess this state would be then! The "strategy" you recommend is a slippery slope you know...If you will notice, family DOES come first in many cases but the resources they are/were able to marshall are highly variable and finite. Not everyone believes in the opiate of the masses either. Would you prefer to see a bunch of older people withering and dying in vacant lots?
"Not everyone believes in the opiate of the masses either. Would you prefer to see a bunch of older people withering and dying in vacant lots?" I do not know what this means, but no I do not, and I did not say anythinglike that. Wise up. Do you not see any other choice?
Experienced the need is the only way to qualify to speak to a topic? Huh.
During the last 8 years of my mothers life, my sisters went to my parents home to care for her daily. I lived out of state so the best thing I could do is pay my parents bills, so I did that. My father sold off all his unnessasary assets to pay the medical bills as he could. My parents would never accept welfare, and tought us the same. He didnt need to, and I won't need to either.
During the last 5 months of my fathers life, I paid all his bills while my sister moved in to take care of him. (he was diagnosed with stage 4 small cell lung cancer and died 5 months later)
I prefer people to have family, church, and local communty for support. If all else fails, the government. NEVER govenment first.
And I laud you for your service to your family, as I did the same and can understand the sacrifices, and congratulate the fact that life has treated you fortunately enough to be able to be generous. Of course we utilized all assets from the estate for years before the necessity for IHHS. My family member managed to out-live her assets and our retirement fund (which was liquidized to pay for her care) and our savings. So you see the imperative that required state/federal assistance.
"The opiate of the masses" is how Marx characterized religion--and while I wholeheartedly support people's right to religious affiliation, I also support and affirm the right to be free from religion.
The community was a hugh support also, by stepping in and helping to maintain the property and maintaining contact with my ailing parents. Between us, the church, and the neighbors, we were able to develop a near 24 hour contact with my folks as they were dying.
i have two kids and a mortage to pay. I have a full time job , and I had a part time job that paid me over $25.00 an hour. I have to work two jobs in order to support my kids. When my mom who doesn't speak english got sick, I had to leave my part time job to take care of her on evenings and on weekends. I love to take care of my mom for free, but I also have a family of my own to support. I left my part time job that paid me $25.00 an hour to working for her which I earn $11.00 an hour. I have been working hard all my life and lived a honest life.