STORYLINE Government

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Lauded by supporters, IHSS faces criticism and cuts

by Anthony Bento, published on September 25, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Storyline: Government RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

As a response to a $72 million shortfall, Sacramento County officials proposed on September 16 an over $1 million funding reduction to In Home Support Services (IHSS), a program that provides home care for the disabled and elderly. According to the county proposal, the reduction, "will leave [IHSS] with 52 case-carrying social workers for over 21,000 cases."

The $1 million cut would only save the county roughly $490,000. The remainder of the lost funds would come from the elimination of $515,000 in attached federal monies.

According to Laura McCasland, Communications Officer at the Sacramento County Deptartment of Health and Human Services, a last-minute infusion of state resources has restored the federal monies and likely saved IHSS from dramatic cuts, although reductions will leave the program with less than 63 positions to oversee 21,000 cases.

The IHSS program compensates caregivers with an hourly wage -- $10.40 per hour in Sacramento County -- for providing home care to disabled and elderly persons. The purpose of the program is to help vulnerable Californians remain safely in their homes while saving resources that may otherwise be spent on institutional care.

According to the California Department of Social Services, "Nearly 60 percent of IHSS providers are family members of recipients."

Some, including Governor Schwarzenegger, have argued that IHSS is rife with abuse, a claim that has been substantiated by a March 23 Sacramento County grand jury report.

The grand jury found that, "At its best, [IHSS] is a dysfunctional system plagued by upper management who refuse to make meaningful changes or even look into matters that will be beneficial to the truly needy people [IHSS] is pledged to support. ... The lack of fiscal controls and oversight at IHSS has made it an easy target for those who are greedy."

The grand jury report has led to the creation of a multi-agency District Attorney task force that is currently investigating fraud at IHSS.

Supporters of IHSS, however, are suspicious of the grand jury's claims. "Have you ever seen anyone being prosecuted for fraud? No. Where are the prosecutions if there is fraud?" said Human Services Specialist George Raya, in an interview with the Sacramento Press.

Official statewide investigations into IHSS have been generally supportive of the program.

Earlier this year, allegations of IHSS misuse prompted the California State Senate to order the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes (SOOO) to examine the program. On March 24, SOOO issued its report on IHSS, which found strong, but qualified, support for the program. While the report did criticize the program's inability to verify timesheets completed by caregivers, the report "found general consensus that [IHSS] saves taxpayers money in nursing home costs and improves the lives of its vulnerable beneficiaries."

In the July budget revision, the state government reduced funding for the program by $263.5 million. These reductions, which were a response to a $62 billion state deficit, will "limit the provision of IHSS services to the neediest consumers," according to a California state budget report issued by the Governor's office.

Responding to program criticism, budget-related changes include the implementation of "rigorous anti-fraud efforts," according to the report. They will require that all providers attend an orientation and be fingerprinted and subject caregivers to civil penalties if they falsify timesheets.

The California Department of Social Services reports that on Nov. 1, program reductions will result in 36,000 individuals currently covered by IHSS losing care coverage while approximately 97,000 see a reduction in care.

IHSS's future is uncertain, as it is largely tied to the status of California's state and county budgets, but supporters argue that cuts to the program create greater societal costs in the future. "It saves pennies, but it costs pounds later," said George Raya.

The Legislative Analyst's Office has reached a similar conclusion. A report issued by the organization on April 14, 2008 found that the IHSS program costs $12,406 per enrollee, while the comparable cost of a Medi-Cal skilled nursing facility was $57,182.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 26, 2009 | 9:16 AM
The real issue is not abuse (although there probably is some) but rather why are taxpayers paying family members what family members are supposed to do already and that is take care of each other.

There is little evidence that the IHSS worker is leaving a full time job to take care of an elderly relative. It most cases the family seems to be watching the clock and as soon a grandma hits the magic age... they get themselves hired.

It smacks of welfare. Meanwhile, genuinely needy elderly are left to vend for themselves or drift with inadequate support.
2 1
REPLY
September 27, 2009 | 10:50 PM
Most of the family members I know who receive money from IHSS, work many more hours than they get paid for. And yes, there is evidence, as well as plain old common sense, that relatives can't be at home caring for an aging parent or disabled child and work at the same time. If you do really know of these fraudulent cases you describe, why haven't you reported them to the authorities?
0 0
REPLY
September 29, 2009 | 2:35 PM
If all these people drop off the system and either die or find themselves in the street, you will have to step over the bodies. If they go to nursing homes instead, it will cost 10 times as much. Many are required to provide 24 hour care and paid for 8 hours. If you took, every penney they are given, it would still be a tiny fraction of any help with the deficit.
0 0
REPLY
September 26, 2009 | 1:09 PM
Even with marginal wage improvements in some counties over the last decade, this is still a profession which attracts too few to meet the need. This is why family members often are the only help available, especially in the vast rural portions of our state. They also know the needs better, and ease issues based around intimate aspects like bathing and bowel/bladder requirements. One of the original purposes when formed under Gov. Reagan was to provide some compensation for family members who gave up gainful employment to care for loved ones. Too much of the caustic rhethoric is driven by a governor who dislikes unions, perpetuated by ambitious DAs and a press corp that often wants to sensationalize the worst aspects of a topic, with the result being self-righteous indignation of people who couldn't fathom having to depend on this service to survive. As an IHSS consumer who serves as advocate for 450,000 fellow recipients statewide, I can only say we deserve better than being abandoned or perceived in terms of the lowest common demoninator.
2 0
REPLY
September 26, 2009 | 4:11 PM
I was more than a little disappointed in the statement that the Sacramento County Grand Jury "substantiated" Gov. Schwarzenegger's wild claims of "massive" fraud in the IHSS program.

It did no such thing. The Grand Jury report, like the governor's statements, was heavy on heated remarks but lacked actual statistical proof to back up the claim of widespread fraud. It's also relevant that district attorneys help guide the "findings" of Grand Juries. Since Sacramento County DA Jan Scully is a vocal supporter of the governor's so-called "anti-fraud" campaign, it isn't surprising that her Grand Jury came out with such a report.

Every piece of documented statistical evidence we've seen shows the actual rate of IHSS fraud to be no more than one to two percent. Now any instance of such fraud is wrong and should be investigated and punished. But that doesn't make it riight for the governor and Ms. Scully, among others, to brand hundreds of thousands of our most vulnerable citizens and the people who serve them as fraud criminals.
2 1
REPLY
September 28, 2009 | 8:05 AM
As a former IHSS caregiver, I quit working a "real" job that had potential for development to care for an elderly relative 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, who was incontinent, bed-bound and had dementia. This "job" wasn't going to get me "up a career ladder." Yes, I wish I could have afforded the expenses myself, but I take pride in the fact that I was able to save the state thousands of dollars a month by avoiding moving this relative to a Medi-care paid nursing home. I was nowhere near compensated enough for the work I did, as I was only paid for 40 hours a week, and had almost NO institutional nor medical support. The portrayal of these workers as cheats is highly offensive--they work harder than most state government workers do.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  September 28, 2009 | 9:06 AM
I applaud people for doing the right thing: take care of your family. I had a great friend who was is law school who dropped out to move in with the grandmother to care for her. The family had a meeting and determined how much every family member needed to pay monthly to support her and her grandmother, and she stepped up and moved across the state to live with and care for the grandmother for her final 3 years. Every family member paid what they could, and there was never a though of asking for public assistance. Family first, then church, then community.
0 0
REPLY
September 28, 2009 | 12:15 PM
I am an IHSS worker and I work far more hours than I am paid for, I am not a family member. Many of these people will be forced into nursing homes at a cost double the cost of the IHSS program but that cost will come from the federal budget and not the state budget. Don't be fooled, this is really a net cost increase to the tax payer, not a savings.
0 0
REPLY
September 28, 2009 | 1:36 PM
family first, then church, then community. Tax strangers last.
0 0
REPLY
September 28, 2009 | 2:27 PM
Well, who have you taken care of thsas, day in, day out? What if no one is available in the family to meet the need? Until you have experienced the need I suggest you refrain from judgement that is inherent in your statement. I sincerely hope you aren't left pooping your diapers at age 80 in a state-run nursing home, and that your capitalistic acumen has allowed you to take advantage of the system to your own benefit to the degree that you will never need help.

Since I don't drive at all, should I decline to pay any road taxes and let all the actual drivers pool their resources to pay for roads? What a mess this state would be then! The "strategy" you recommend is a slippery slope you know...If you will notice, family DOES come first in many cases but the resources they are/were able to marshall are highly variable and finite. Not everyone believes in the opiate of the masses either. Would you prefer to see a bunch of older people withering and dying in vacant lots?
0 0
REPLY
edited on  September 28, 2009 | 6:56 PM
Pinelli, I have taken care of my parents for many years. Its my capitalistic nature. Working hard and taking opportunity is not taking advantage. Drivers do pay for driving, there are required gas taxs and license fees. If you do not buy gas or license plates, or sales tax on a vehicle purchase, you are not paying as much as drivers who own cars do.
"Not everyone believes in the opiate of the masses either. Would you prefer to see a bunch of older people withering and dying in vacant lots?" I do not know what this means, but no I do not, and I did not say anythinglike that. Wise up. Do you not see any other choice?
Experienced the need is the only way to qualify to speak to a topic? Huh.
During the last 8 years of my mothers life, my sisters went to my parents home to care for her daily. I lived out of state so the best thing I could do is pay my parents bills, so I did that. My father sold off all his unnessasary assets to pay the medical bills as he could. My parents would never accept welfare, and tought us the same. He didnt need to, and I won't need to either.
During the last 5 months of my fathers life, I paid all his bills while my sister moved in to take care of him. (he was diagnosed with stage 4 small cell lung cancer and died 5 months later)
I prefer people to have family, church, and local communty for support. If all else fails, the government. NEVER govenment first.
0 0
REPLY
September 29, 2009 | 8:03 AM
I apologize--I misconstrued your statement. I was merely stating that not all older people have the luxury of family, nor do all families have the resources required for extended elder-care. In that case, I would much rather have my government step in than deny older people basic human dignity.

And I laud you for your service to your family, as I did the same and can understand the sacrifices, and congratulate the fact that life has treated you fortunately enough to be able to be generous. Of course we utilized all assets from the estate for years before the necessity for IHHS. My family member managed to out-live her assets and our retirement fund (which was liquidized to pay for her care) and our savings. So you see the imperative that required state/federal assistance.

"The opiate of the masses" is how Marx characterized religion--and while I wholeheartedly support people's right to religious affiliation, I also support and affirm the right to be free from religion.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  September 29, 2009 | 3:43 PM
thanks, The church was a big help to my father after my mother passed. The church helped him to regain a purpose in life, after his reason for living had ceased. They kept him eating when he lost the will to exist and they got him out of the house. There are positive influences that church had on my fathers and mothers life that we, their children could not do for them.
The community was a hugh support also, by stepping in and helping to maintain the property and maintaining contact with my ailing parents. Between us, the church, and the neighbors, we were able to develop a near 24 hour contact with my folks as they were dying.
0 0
REPLY
September 29, 2009 | 2:44 PM
California like to advertise it is a liberal haven who cares about the needy and illegal alien. There are costs to do so. About 5-10 billion can be traced to the deficit to educating illegal aliens. nobody wants to attact that. The disabled didn't come here illegally, they were either born this way or some event put them in need. They would not have had to make the cuts if the one set of liberals would have allowed more drilling for oil on the existing platforms. Can't have that. So cut to the disabled instead, a group they think will not fight back. A civilized society takes care of there disabled, unless you wish to be like Nazi Germany that routinely executed their disabled. What kind of nation do you wish to be?
0 0
REPLY
October 13, 2009 | 6:32 PM
I take care of my 84 year old incontinent mother and I took care of my father before he passed from lung cancer. My mother has to have round the clock care and cannot stay home alone. She pays high rent and a share of cost for her care and then there is nothing left. I did not come here to take care of her for the MONEY but for her so she could have a little dignity left after losing all of the other things that meant so much to her. I do get paid for 93 hours every two weeks but I am her full time nurse, daughter and friend.. yes I need money to survive and pay our bills that she cant possibly pay. She has nothing but a little self respect left and I ensure she keeps that by taking care of her.IHSS was a God send to us when we needed it most, allowing me to be here working for her instead of being somewhere else not taking care of my mother . Allowing her to stay in a place where she feels safe and is loved. I wont get rich on IHSS but instead can afford to pay what needs to be payed and take care of my mother. I get about 4 hours sleep a night and am barely making it on \what I earn. If you never were in my position then you have no idea what its like, what stress we care givers deal with every day and what we GIVE to our loved ones and elderly by being here for them when they need us most. I do get a good feeling taking care of her and that should be enough but she has no money and I have to work because I don't have the money we need if I don't work. It's a catch 22......You do what you need to do to make sure your loved ones have dignity the last years of their life, every breath they take is important to you and every little smile you get when things are looking bad is worth all the heartache and hard work. Even if they take the help away I will still be here to walk her through what little time she has left and hold her hand and make it easier for her when that time comes. God Bless all the care providers that give so much to our elderly when others want to put them away in a strange place and forget about what they were and who they are.
0 0
REPLY
April 1, 2010 | 6:43 PM
RHYs02
i have two kids and a mortage to pay. I have a full time job , and I had a part time job that paid me over $25.00 an hour. I have to work two jobs in order to support my kids. When my mom who doesn't speak english got sick, I had to leave my part time job to take care of her on evenings and on weekends. I love to take care of my mom for free, but I also have a family of my own to support. I left my part time job that paid me $25.00 an hour to working for her which I earn $11.00 an hour. I have been working hard all my life and lived a honest life.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background