Tag Cloud
Residents and members of a city committee discussed on Wednesday night issues relating to the “strong mayor” initiative, including a statistic which says that a Sacramento strong mayor would have the power to hire a total of 800 city employees.
The city’s Charter Review Committee, which has tentatively recommended that the city maintain its existing City Council/city manager system, held the first of nine town hall meetings with 18 residents at the Natomas High School lunch room. The committee is accepting feedback from the public on its draft report. A separate strong mayor initiative -- which clashes with the charter committee’s draft recommendations -- will go before voters in June 2010.
A handout from the committee that was passed out to residents at the meeting says that the strong mayor initiative would give the mayor the power to hire about 800 non-union city employees.
Cecily Hastings, a member of the charter committee, discussed the issue with residents. “Under the strong mayor initiative — and this is a very controversial part of it — the mayor hires and fires those 800 people directly.”
The city currently has fewer than 800 non-union employees because of vacant positions and layoffs, Hastings said. However, the city could have 800 non-union employees if it is fully-staffed, she added.
Summarizing the committee’s view, she said that firing and hiring of these positions by the mayor would politicize the city staff “far too much.”
The city manager is responsible for hiring and firing non-union staff in the existing system. The committee is recommending in its draft report that the city manager maintain this duty.
Felicia Townsend, a resident who attended the meeting, told Hastings that if the mayor were in charge of hiring and firing the 800 people instead of the city manager, it would still be “just one person who has control over all those people.”
The committee felt that the mayor is a “political” job, while the city manager is a “professional” job, Hastings said, responding to Townsend.
Townsend said after the meeting that she is leaning toward supporting the strong mayor initiative. She said she attended the charter committee’s meeting because she wanted to hear the committee’s views.
The meeting also attracted supporters of the charter committee’s ideas. Brandon Ruiz, a volunteer with Support Accountability, Voice and Ethics in Sacramento, passed out print-outs opposing the strong mayor initiative. He also asked residents in attendance to sign petitions against the initiative after the meeting. The group is taking signatures on petitions in an effort to gather information and raise awareness of SAVE, he said.
Read this Sept. 21 story for the times, dates and locations of the charter committee's remaining town hall meetings.
Photo by Anthony Bento.
Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.
You weren't humbled at all by your gaffe on the Front Page, eh? In response to your mea culpa, someone suggested you "slow down" and you came back with even more arrogance "Slow down? For what?"
I had some supportive comments for you on that, without time to submit them. You'd be better off not elbowing everyone out of the picture you pretend you want to be a part of. Your habit in person is to talk over everyone. You probably have no idea how funny it was that the speaker at the Sustainability Forum replied to you after your "question," "You didn't ask a question."
Some of us could handle you if you can handle yourself. It's not a good idea to tromp in and claim nothing was happening before you arrived and everyone else should just piss off.
That's what the cronyistic developers do.
"I stated .. Don’t you have any responses to my questions? She offered nothing, I believe it was Richard Noss who stated…”You didn’t ask a question.” Well I believe I had, but regardless, I repeated my questions just to make sure she got it…"
KJ is not the problem with Sacramento
You're right, KJ is just the tip of the iceberg. Only now, he wants to be Captain of the Titanic.
I have issues with these so-called town hall meetings. Where was the discussions about the good that might occur with a strong mayor (no idea is totally bad)? Just another example of the city council using public funds and facilities to campaign against the initiative.
The "Strong Mayor" initiative's proponents have plenty of time (and money) to talk about the pluses of their measure. The Charter Committee has been discussing the pros and cons of various city government options for the past few months--that is the whole point.
"Where was the discussions about the good that might occur with a strong mayor (no idea is totally bad)?"
There has not been any open and honest discussion about it, intentionally, by the forces that are FOR the Strong Mayor. They have only provided bumpersticker nonsense and bogus platitudes. The latest SacPress piece up on this issue has KJ at a Land Park meeting spewing more of the same, totally meaningless. The mayor's spokesman shows up on SacPress only to divert and disinform -- when has he EVER provided actual information such as you are suggesting?
The Johnson campaign doesn't want a full and open process, has tried to kill it and doesn't want an informed public either. They are counting on an uninformed public voting for throwing the baby out with the bathwater in June 2010.