STORYLINE News in Sacramento

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Property dispute at latest "Safe Ground" location

by Jonathan Mendick, published on September 16, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Storyline: News in Sacramento RSS Feed

1 of 8
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 8
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

For about 30 years, the Hernandez family has owned the only house on the block of 13th Street between B and C Streets. Until Aug. 21, the rest of the block surrounding their home was filled with vacant lots.

"Safe Ground" came to the block when Sacramento lawyer and homeless advocate Mark Merin, who has owned several of the adjacent lots since 2007, teamed up with non-profits, businesses and other individuals. Tightly fit rows of matching tents complete with a "Safe Ground" logo (click here for photograph) began filling the one vacant lot directly behind the Hernandez's house, and for nearly a month, tents have housed about 40 homeless people on the property.

Monday, the Hernandez family, with the support of attorney Aldon Bolanos, filed a lawsuit against Merin on the grounds that the encampment on the property is a private nuisance. Though the tenants of the house are Pedro and Gracilla Hernandez, who are both in their early 70s, their daughter owns the title for the house.

The city had already filed a similar suit on Sept. 9 against Merin for the property being a public nuisance .

Bolanos met the Hernandez family when he was walking his dog. He stopped to watch the campers move onto the Merin-owned property, and the Hernandez family struck up a conversation with him as they watched the tents being installed.

Bolanos also lives in the Downtown area, but further from the camp area. After hearing the Hernandez's story, he felt compelled to take the case, he said.

The dispute over the property began in March 2007 when Merin purchased the plot of land behind the Hernandez residence. Because it was too small to build upon based on city code, he wanted to connect it to an even smaller piece of property he owns on the corner of 13th and C Streets, also next to the Hernandez residence.

After finding out that the only way to do this was through the Hernandez's plot, Merin approached Pedro Hernandez, 72, to try to purchase their backyard. When Hernandez refused, wanting to keep his yard, Merin sued him, alleging a property line boundary dispute.

The suit dragged on for over a year, costing the Hernandez family north of $100,000 in legal fees. But when they won the case last October (the dispute was unfounded), Merin was forced to settle the case out of court.

"It's called playing dirty," said Bolanos, referring to both the lawsuit and Merin's use of the property as a "Safe Ground" location. Since the encampment has taken residence, the Hernandez family has complained about loud noise, garbage, urine, feces, cockroaches, rats and even drug transactions including crack, heroin and meth, Bolanos added.

"[Mr. Hernandez] has observed these campers urinating on his home," Bolanos added. "It's tough for them, and they have a host of health problems, so this has made it a lot worse for [them]."

"You tell me how you would feel if you had this problem in your backyard," Hernandez, 72, said in a Sacramento Bee article. "You can imagine how [my family and I] feel."

Because the encampment is a violation of a city ordinance that prohibits camping for more than 24 hours, police have been regularly entering the property, arresting campers and confiscating tents and other camping equipment. Tents and camping equipment have been donated after every raid.

"I'm sympathetic to the plight of homeless, and if somebody wants to live outside, that's fine with me," Bolanos said. "But to do it in the Downtown core of a major city--and they do it in a manner that affects other people; other people's rights have to be considered, too."

Bolanos expects both the public and private nuisance suits to be combined since they are "substantially similar," he said. If all goes according to plan, Bolanos said the campers might be restricted from Merin's property beginning Thursday, Sept. 17.

He also said that Merin could receive an injunction against campers on his property as early as Tuesday, Sept. 22. But the court's decision on whether Merin violated the law and provided an opportunity for "unlawful camping" could take up to 10 months, Bolanos added.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 16, 2009 | 7:47 PM
Well now we know the TRUE motives of this so-called homeless advocate. he is a bottom feeder that doesn't know beans about real estate and is trying to force the Hernandez off their property so he can develop the losers he thought was going to be a gold mine.

I wonder what the 'good' sisters of Loaves and Fishes think of their champion??
6 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 12:36 AM
"Other people's rights have to be considered, too."

Well said Bolanos!
6 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 10:56 AM
**Note** Photographs show the camp ground separated from the Hernandez residence by a sometimes-barbed, sometimes not-barbed chain-link fence.
0 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 11:54 AM
Merin is slime.
2 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 12:11 PM
Of course, the situation could be avoided if the city and county fulfilled their responsibility to their citizens -- and if the community hadn't failed in our obligation to our less fortunate neighbors. We're all better off if the homeless are properly housed -- in shelters in the short term and in affordable housing, with programs to help them get back on their feet, in the longer term.

We cannot simply wish the homeless away. If we do not provide proper shelter for them, they will be camping in somebody's backyard. That is the reality.

The problems are clear. We are spending much too much time talking about the problems and nowhere near enough talking about solutions.

I'm looking forward to hearing what Mayor Johnson brings forward next month. We should all be applauding his efforts and holding him accountable for bringing forward real solutions, not just lip service.
3 4
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 9:14 PM
I think the homeless in this town can do with a better class of advocates on their behalf. "Safe Ground" wants them all to live on dirty lots. Loaves and Fishes has turned the area around it's properties into a scene out of Night of the Living Dead, all the while Sister Libby expands her empire. The dingbats who staged the protest at City Hall last week missed the chance to address the Board of Supervisors who were discussing cuts to homeless services AT THE VERY SAME TIME AS THE PROTEST. Now Mark Merin is using the homeless as pawns in his sick vendetta against his elderly neighbor.

I home the homeless in this town catch on to the fact that they are being used by savvy players who really have no intention of helping them get housed, but just want to line there own pockets.
1 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 1:39 PM
Since Mark Marin decided to be a landlord he ought to be held accountable for not providing even the most basic and legal necessities for his tenants. America is the symbol of freedom yet there are still responsibilities even for landlords and tenants of a tent city. If these people are using the streets as a toilet, being loud and open with their drug and alcohol use they need to be held accountable for their actions. I once lived on the streets, homeless with only the clothes on my back but never disturbed anyone and that is the problem here. We have a landlord and tenants who want to do as they please without being held accountable for their actions and that is wrong. There is no one answer for all problems and all problems will always exist, it is the sad reality of life yet that excuses no one from being a decent human being. So Mark Marin, shame on you for your bully tactics and shame on the tent city dwellers for presenting such a bad example for what could have been a small resolution for homeless and the use of vacant property.
4 0
REPLY
JGS
Author thumbnail
September 17, 2009 | 3:07 PM
Hey Devin,
Have you ever considered how these homeless people failed to fullfil their responsibility and obligations to themselves? Being homeless is not al altruistic position. If you are so concerned with the homeless having affordable housing, perhaps you should put your money up and provide them with the things you consider to be necessities. There are numerous programs to help the homeless that are privately run, and voluntary. Taking money from people who've earned it and giving it to the homeless to subsidize their lifestyle is a worthless proposition. Its not a solution nor does it result in a lower homeless rate,, (see San Francisco for a perfect example of this.)
2 1
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 4:27 PM
Right, it always easier to delegate how other people’s moneys spent than to use your own.

Devin, how much of your own money do you spend to lift up the homeless?
3 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 3:16 PM
Great article, very in depth. Thank you for giving me some more knowledge about the subject.
1 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 7:43 PM
the city should be helping the homeless out instead of chasing them around and writing them tickets that they obviously don't have the money to pay .... the empty fenced in park over on 15th and C street would be perfect for letting some unfortunate folks camp out at.... throw a port a potty their way. and a patrol car for security...... Unfortunately the churches are still getting away without paying their taxes and are still more concerned about their souls in the next life instead of helping these folks out NOW.
1 2
REPLY
September 18, 2009 | 2:43 PM
..." some unfortunate folks"....If they could just seperate those folks from the bums who like the lifestyle, I think it would be much easier to get support.
0 0
REPLY
September 17, 2009 | 8:04 PM
This is a bunch of crap and lies. I love Sac Press, but this article is an example of why you have to filter the lies from the truth for yourself with such a forum. Go see for yourself and meet the people that stay at Safe Ground and talk to them. You'll learn quickly that no one pees on the Fernandez's house, (they have a portalet on site) that they are quiet and respectful of their neighbor, and that this is all what I said before...a buch of crap and lies. Please! Don't buy into this propeganda.
0 1
REPLY
edited on  September 17, 2009 | 10:43 PM
Mr. Merin hired a public relations firm so that the homeless at the campsite can be at their best behavior. www.giarizzoconsulting.com . A friend and I were near the campsite when they came by to check the site and they gave my friend their business card. I have also seen the homeless at the campsite constantly fighting with each other and causing a bunch of noise. And to top it off the homeless at the campsite have mocked Mr. Hernandez and have knocked on his door at 12:30 am and have asked him if he supports Safeground. This article is the truth and I just can't believe you would believe that these people are lying about their situation. Please be informed . I ask you to not believe or buy into Merin's agenda. Google him and you will understand. If he is your friend , then I can't help you with that. If Mr. Merin wants to help the homeless that is his right, but he should not do it at the expense of somebody else's rights.
P.S. How you ever been around when a portapotty is cleaned? The smell is not very plesant and I doubt you want to around .
2 0
REPLY
September 18, 2009 | 2:41 PM
I live fairly close and go by twice a week. There is lots of trash on the street and people sleeping on the sidewalks and lots of drinking in the alleys all around there.
0 0
REPLY
September 18, 2009 | 10:47 AM
Author's note: Unfortunately I did not contact Mark Merin for more insight before publishing this article.

The property he owns is large enough to develop, but according to Merin, there are no plans to do so.

The following addendum features Merin's response to this article: http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/13836/Addendum_Safe_Ground_property_dispute

To view the addendum, please copy the above URL and paste it into your browser, or click the green 'storyline' tab on the right side of the page and click on the next story in the storyline.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background