Tag Cloud
The Sacramento City Council split with Mayor Kevin Johnson Tuesday on plans to create an independent budget analyst’s office, with eight members of the council in favor of hiring one person who could hold the positions of both city auditor and independent budget analyst. Johnson, meanwhile, backed the idea of forming two distinct offices, with one office for the city auditor and another office for the independent budget analyst.
At issue is a proposal from the Sacramentans for Accountable Government group to create an independent budget analyst’s office. Johnson supports the group’s efforts, which also include a “strong mayor” campaign to allow the mayor of Sacramento to gain more authority. The City Council voted 8-1 to ask city staff to bring back a job description for a city official that would simultaneously be a city auditor and budget analyst.
The city could yield savings and gain efficiency if it can find a candidate who could hold both the city auditor and independent budget analyst positions, Councilmember Steve Cohn said.
Johnson strongly disagreed. By creating two offices, the city would spend a little more money on the front end but potentially save more on the back end, he said. “I think we’ve actually taken a step backwards if you don’t keep the two departments separate,” he said.
The city auditor would analyze the finances of city departments, while the independent budget analyst’s job would be to examine policy decisions in the context of city finances, City Treasurer Russ Fehr said.
The city’s internal auditor position has been vacant since May, when former auditor Marty Kolkin left the post for a new job in Santa Monica. Patti Bisharat, the city’s director of governmental affairs, told the City Council last month that the internal auditor position may not be filled until January 2010 or later.
Photo by Anthony Bento.
Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.
We need independent audits of every department from top to bottom to find out where money is being wasted or which could be better utilized elsewhere.
I cannot fathom why anyone would be against having regular independent audits of their local government.
The council had an opportunity for a free audit, they turned it down.
The City needs an independent auditor, the City Manager is not Independent.
And, again, the "strong mayor" proponents seem to have serious problems with the idea of a city manager, but they seem to be absolutely overjoyed with the current city manager, even though they claim that the city manager system is the cause of all of Sacramento's problems. Why is that?
The "free audit" was the kind of "free" with strings attached, designed to reach a foregone conclusion--that's why the Council said no. It's kind of like the "free credit report" in the commercial that actually ends up charging you money.
The other alternative you suggest, that the city is deliberately being mismanaged to encourage support for "strong mayor," implies that Kerridge is in on it, since it would need his support--do you have any proof to back up that rather serious allegation?