STORYLINE Sacramento's Anti Camping Ordinance

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Sacramento City Police Arrest 17 Homeless Campers

by Justin Wandro, published on September 4, 2009 at 3:52 PM

1 of 5
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 5
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Sacramento City Police once again have raided the small SafeGround camp site in downtown. This time they weren’t just looking for illegal tents and sleeping bags, instead they came looking for people.


They arrived around 7:30 am, with a warrant, and quickly proceeded to handcuff and line up most all the campers still on site. With over half a dozen squad cars, seventeen officers, the police van, and the CSI unit, they were able to arrest and move downtown seventeen campers including retired Methodist Minister Rev. David Moss. As of this writing, the campers are being processed and released with a citation and court date for October.


Six of the campers along with Sister Libby of Loaves & Fishes were arrested but later released onsite without being charged. According to officer Leong they weren’t detained further because they didn’t have any prior camping citations.


After all the police left I spoke with one of the campers who was not cited. Tipp, is a very jovial man, and despite the stress of the mornings events was able to laugh at the irony of the situation. “I’ve got three tents and two sleeping bags in police lock up.” And if things keep going this way, who knows how many tents the police may take from him.


So how many tents have to be taken from Tipp before somebody realizes he can’t go anywhere else? Sergeant Leong, of the Sacramento Police department stated himself that “Arrests are not a solution to this” but that the police department will continue to do it’s job and enforce the anti-camping ordinance.


So, if the police are going to continue doing their job, enforce existing laws and the homeless are going to keep doing what they have no choice but to do, sleep outside. Then how do we end this viscous cycle? Perhaps our City Council members can take up the matter and lead us to a humane, dignifying, and economically sensible solution.


Contact your City Council member now and tell them you want a humane, dignifying and economically sensible solution to homelessness.
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 4, 2009 | 4:09 PM
Justin,
Your article is right on!
Why can't the City give a piece of land NOW and let those who are homeless stay their SAFELY withour drugs, alcohol and violence like they are already doing at this Safe Ground UNITL WE HAVE MORE HOUSING AVAILABLE?
4 6
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 8:35 PM
How can I get one too? What are the requirements?
6 2
REPLY
September 8, 2009 | 9:29 PM
Thumbs down for asking these great questions?
0 0
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 4:17 PM
Homelessness doesn't end when you arrest people. The city (every community actually) needs to create a simple ordinance that allows this kind of 'camping' under certain circumstances with the proper governance in place. See tinyhousedesign.com for my proposal.

Also... why is the Mayor so silent in this situation? Didn't he just have burgers bought with fod stamps with these people? Now his police department is out arresting them. Weren't the burgers any good? WTF!?
3 6
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 4:51 PM
I've heard from people inside City Hall that the Mayor and the Council were working to setting up a city sanctioned "tent city", but due to the hugely negative public reaction the "safe ground" debacle on C Street generated, those plans have now been scrapped.
7 2
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 5:47 PM
I want to acknowledge PAX12 and michaeljanzen. Tom Runge, you need to get your facts straight.. What the police and the city has done is absolutely disgusting.
Dan Wilson
3 7
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 6:41 PM
I'm just telling you what I've heard. Sorry if that makes up upset. But really....are you surprised by this outcome? Read the comments on the Bee and elsewhere on this story. Sister Libby and the other ding-a-lings that set up this campsite have set back all the progress the County has made with it's 10 Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness. The sooner they are taken out of the equation of finding real solutions to homelessness the better.
7 3
REPLY
September 6, 2009 | 9:09 AM
If the Mayor's office is intent on "finding real solutions to homelessness," these "ding-a-lings" will not prevent that. Unless it's an excuse.
1 6
REPLY
September 6, 2009 | 11:15 AM
Do you actually think that this tent city debacle will dissuade the notion that placing a supportive housing unit in neighborhoods will cause nothing but problems? Do you think that efforts to increase the inclusionary housing fee to pay for these units will be met with greater success because so many hearts and minds were won by this PR stunt gone wrong?

The only people who will benefit from this wrongheaded move are the ding-a-lings who put this together, because simple minded people will buy into the notion that they are trying to help the homeless and want to give them more money, and Mark Merin who has another lawsuit against the city waiting and will collect a handsome fee.
5 1
REPLY
edited on  September 7, 2009 | 12:07 PM
What I "actually think" is that a lot of the comments on SacPress on the issue of homelessness are ignorant, arrogant, elitist, dehumanizing and counterproductive.

As I said, if the mayor's office is intent on "finding real solutions to homelessness," they will continue to do so.

Hopefully there are people working on these issues in more effective ways than calling people "ding-a-lings."
2 1
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 4:28 PM
So, no concern that this "safe ground" debacle has actually decreased the chance of getting the homeless housed? But you do have have time for some self-righteous name calling?

Wonderful.
2 1
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 10:10 PM
TomRunge is another SacPress bully who presumes to say what other people think, when it's not true. A response to his mistaken assumptions is then falsely called "name calling" -- more lies. TomRunge is the bully doing the name calling: "ding-a-lings."

Are these macho jerks going to define the quality of discussion of SacPress?
1 3
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 11:34 PM
ignorant
arrogant
elitist
macho
jerk

These are your words.

And you still haven't addressed the issue of why you're supporting programs that force homeless people to remain on the street.
3 1
REPLY
edited on  September 8, 2009 | 1:58 PM
"Ignorant, arrogant, elitist, dehumanizing and counterproductive" are words describing "a lot of the comments on SacPress on the issue of homelessness." Jim Runge falsely claims this is "name-calling."

"Are these macho jerks going to define the quality of discussion of SacPress?"

It's a fair question. "Macho jerks" plural -- and their ignorant, arrogant behavior -- degrade SacPress and should not be allowed to dominate here.

"And you still haven't addressed the issue of why you're supporting programs that force homeless people to remain on the street."

And when did you stop beating your wife?
1 2
REPLY
September 8, 2009 | 2:29 PM
My name is Tom Runge--not Jim

Libby Hernandez and Mark Merin have made themselves public figures and are open for criticism. No body was attacking other posters on this thread until you came along. Try addressing the the contents of the article and the comments instead of making personal attacks.

And yes....yYou still haven't addressed the issue of why you're supporting programs that force homeless people to remain on the street.
1 1
REPLY
September 8, 2009 | 3:02 PM
TimRunge can't make things up and demand that others respond to his inventions. He attacks others with his aggressive behavior and false accusations. Will he succeed in running off SacPress readers who don't like his hostility, name calling and misstatements of what others think?

If TimRunge took his own advice and "Try addressing the the contents of the article and the comments instead of making personal attacks," he wouldn't be calling public figures "ding-a-lings" and pretending it's "criticism."
1 1
REPLY
September 8, 2009 | 7:25 PM
I think a robust debate is what attracts many people to comment on webites such as Sacpress. The breakdown usually occurs when posters resort to name calling as a way of avoiding the deficiencies in their arguments. Examples of posters attacking people in this thread include the use of the terms ignorant, arrogant, elitist, macho, jerk, and bully. Another typical hallmark of these types of posters is call for intervention from the moderators, when none is actually called for. A simple remedy to avoid this type of behavior is to have posters who are up to the challenge of defending their point of view.

Which brings me to...... You still haven't addressed the issue of why you're supporting programs that force homeless people to remain on the street.
0 1
REPLY
September 9, 2009 | 12:05 PM
"Robust" doest not mean aggressive and pushy.

"Sister Libby and the other ding-a-lings that set up this campsite have set back all the progress the County has made with it's 10 Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness."

TimRunge was the one doing the name-calling.

"The breakdown usually occurs when posters resort to name calling as a way of avoiding the deficiencies in their arguments."

There is no argument. I said, "If the mayor's office is intent on "finding real solutions to homelessness," they will continue to do so" and "Hopefully there are people working on these issues in more effective ways than calling people "ding-a-lings."

No one called for "intervention from the moderators." The question was put to the community whether TomRunge will drive off people who find his behavior unbearable. Or maybe they will just ignore him.

What TomRunge is calling "argument" is a strawman, set up by him, based on his false assumptions, for someone else to defend what he pretends is "their point of view."

Classic internet bully. Ignores what is actually being said and tries to force his lies on other people,

Anyone who is "up to the challenge of defending their point of view" can do it without acting like a hostile brute, TimRunge.
0 0
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 9:49 PM
This is a good online newspaper forum for people to share their stuff together. This whole Safeground situation has been grossly mishandled and gotten completely out of hand by the City of Sacramento.

We need the Mayor and City Council Members to have the courage to be assertive and speak out in favor of Safeground. We need to look at the next round of Elections and replace the cowardly politically corrupt fools who are on the City Council. lf one does not take a position that is right, that is humane and that respects the dignity of human beings because of mere political considerations, then, to that point one become corrupt and certainly distorted in relation to the fairness and justice of the truth. We ought to look at running one of our own for the next round of elections. ~ Peter S. Lopez ~peter.lopez51@yahoo.com ~
4 2
REPLY
September 4, 2009 | 10:25 PM
Screw running people for the city council......why not just draft a ballot proposal to have a tent city in Sacramento and let the people vote on it?

Potential talking points could include:
"Don't worry about the smell from the port-o-potties.....they get cleaned once a day."
"Why worry about funding supportive housing units when a tent on a dirty lot will do just fine."
"We're better than you because we care about the homeless."

I'm sure you can get Mark Merin and Mo Mahanna to use some of the money they've looted from the City to foot the bill.
5 2
REPLY
September 5, 2009 | 8:31 AM
I happen to know "Tipp," as the article calls him, very well. I can tell you where he can sleep tonight: the mission. This time of a month, getting a bed there is easy. Or, he can get another sleeping bag or tent from Loaves & Fishes; they have roused their donation base, which is perhaps the only thing they're about.

The mayor and city council or county supervisors would be insane to further involve themselves with the Safe Ground movement. It's so far left politically it's in the seats on the other side of the foul line. It is extreme-complaint oriented, unable to see itself or appreciate the stance of any position that doesn't toe its line.

Indeed, until the crazies who manipulate the homeless people are put out of the boat, people trapped in a homeless circumstance in Sacramento will be having to endure increased suffering.

Loaves & Fishes has property in its complex from a recently raised building. It also had $2 million in cash and liquid assets at the end of 2008. It had a donation-getting spree during the Oprah-fueled thing last spring. The path toward helping the homeless is broad, but Sr. Libby prefers to play the part of the martyr. One day, she's gonna get incarcerated, damn it! And get a street or park named after her.
6 1
REPLY
September 5, 2009 | 10:25 AM
I think that there should be more guidance and direction
for teens from their parents. There is no excuse for someone
to go out into the world with limited or no life coping skills.
It is the most important thing in life. Moral values, day to day
skills and how to communicate as a mature adult. Homelessness
can be dealt with but a stronger effort must be made sooner than later towards
wellness.
2 0
REPLY
September 5, 2009 | 10:32 AM
I have met many homeless folks in two years in Victoria, BC
Canada. They all seem to have low or no motivation. Sleeping,
panhandling, drug & sex trade is all they know! This kind of life
style will get you nowhere fast. I hope that things change in town
because there have been many, many issues and some deaths
concerning these folks. You can get better if you make that change.
Social services is there to bridge the gap. It is not a lifetime way
of living. I think that things can get on track if street people meet
health professionals halfway. No one is perfect! But we all have
to try the best we can in this world. Respect, peace, and hope are
a great way to start!
5 0
REPLY
September 5, 2009 | 10:19 PM
I agree 100% with Michelle. Rather than to assist the "homeless" in remaining dependant upon public assistance we should assist them by giving them guidance. We need to STOP treating them as if they are victims of society and admit to ourselves that they are professional victims of their own design. By continuing to provide for them, we are assisting the majority of them into an early grave! Most (I realize that a very small portion are truly mentally ill and need assistance) are fully capable of taking care of themselves along with becoming contributing members of society. The problem is that the good people of Sacramento seem to get the warm fuzzy's by taking care of them. When you raise a child, you hope to teach them life skills , solid morals and SELF RESPECT. You know its a job well done when they become self supporting adults. I live in Midtown and interact daily with these "vicitoms" . They are perfectly capable of working. They ride stolen bikes,push stolen shopping carts, illegally enter residents property to illegally go through their recycling and garbage cans. They break into cars (notice the piles of broken glass on the streets? We need to STOP treating these people as if they are pathetic victims. They are adults who made bad decisions and will continue to do so until we tell them that they need to grow up and be adults. Give them a timeline. If they knew that their behavior will no longer be tolerated and they will not be welcome to camp in our parks, streets, private homes and businesses. Give them a list of substance abuse rehab. options. Sacramento residents who wish to cotinue to take care of them should seek a permit to allow them to camp on your property. I cant imagine why you wouldnt want to take them into your homes since the homeless victims that you speak of are harmless, good people who are clean and honest. That just may be the solution.
5 1
REPLY
September 6, 2009 | 9:52 PM
Only in America can you be homeless, and fat!
5 1
REPLY
edited on  September 7, 2009 | 1:02 PM
Actually the poor are more apt to be fat because cheap food is unhealthy, processed and high in sugar and fat content.

Try shopping at Whole Foods and FoodMax, 7/11 and McDonalds...you can see the difference rather easily.
4 0
REPLY
edited on  September 8, 2009 | 2:34 PM
And cells phone seem to be pretty normal. (I have never had one)
Did anyone else see that news photo of Michelle Obama working at a food kitchen serving meals to the homeless, where the homeless being served whipped out their Blackberrys to get a picture of her?
6 0
REPLY
September 12, 2009 | 4:35 PM
Many homeless have phones BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO HAVE THEM TO GET SHORTTERM JOBS AND TO TRY TO GET PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT. Do you know how difficult it is to search for work without a telephone!? Thsas, you say you have never had a cellphone, well, homeless people DON'T HAVE ANY PHONE OTHER THAN A CELLPHONE.

Expensive phones and services for cellphones are rare in Sacramento, but for some homeless people, understandably, a phone is important and a high priority, to search for work and stay in contact with family.
0 0
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 11:15 AM
Do you think the homeless should have a land line? FTW?
0 5
REPLY
edited on  September 7, 2009 | 12:58 PM
I do not know what FTW means, sorry. I do know that a cell phone is a luxury exspense, so I think it is odd to see the money spent on that by someone who cannot afford a living space and is taking free food away from those it is intended help; those who cannot afford it.
4 0
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 4:20 PM
Being connected in today's world is hardly a luxury expense. You can get basic cell plans for $30.00 a month, if not less.
2 4
REPLY
edited on  September 8, 2009 | 9:39 AM
I think compared to buying food so one can live, it would be a lavish exspense.
3 0
REPLY
September 8, 2009 | 11:04 AM
FTW means For the Win. I think he meant, WTF.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  September 8, 2009 | 2:33 PM
Thanks Paul. My thoughts exactly, when I saw the $200 Blackberry user in the photo.
1 0
REPLY
September 7, 2009 | 12:21 PM
Our idea of hungry and homeless is laughed at in many countries and with good reason. Check out the food stamps/free lunch crowd at public schools, they drive SUVs, have cellphones, tattoos and their hair and nails professionally done. When is the last time you read about another starvation-related death in the US?
5 0
REPLY
edited on  September 7, 2009 | 1:01 PM
The issues you are speaking of are WELFARE FRAUD...

Welfare fraud is a huge problem....Immigrants from other countries are taught how to scam the system, and they do a great job of it. Many believe that welfare is a way of life. There are companies in Sacramento (Russian/Ukrainian/Philippino) that actually recruit people (placing add's in foriegn websites and in newspapers) to come here and suck off the system..especially elderly, who the quickly sign up for Social Security and Medi-Care, which the companies take a percentage of. These same companies, which are subsidized by (SHRA) own the low income housing units where these people live and get Section 8 funds....(Keep in mind that if you're an American and did not pay enough into the system you would be denied social security)

If we cut off all immigrants (They should not be allowed to move here and live off welfare and social security) and investigated and prosecuted and DEPORTED those who commit welfare and social security fraud... we would have BILLIONS of dollars to help needy homeless Citizens.
3 0
REPLY
September 10, 2009 | 11:29 AM
Justin, good job keeping this issue in the public eye and public dialogue.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background