STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Council approves proposal for an outside audit

by Kathleen Haley, published on September 1, 2009 at 10:10 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

In the coming months, the city may have three sets of eyes monitoring its books. In addition to the Sacramento City Council’s plans to fill the city’s vacant internal auditor position early next year, the council may bring in two more parties to review the city’s finances, according to members of the Sacramento City Council. 

The City Council decided at its Tuesday meeting to start the process of hiring an independent company to audit the city’s finances. The city also plans to fill its currently vacant position for an internal auditor. And, there may be a third set of eyes monitoring the city’s books: Councilman Rob Fong noted that the City Council is likely to approve a proposal from the Sacramentans for Accountable Government group to create an independent budget analyst position.

At the meeting, the City Council asked city staff to request proposals from independent companies that could conduct the audit. Mayor Kevin Johnson has made many public comments calling for an independent audit from an outside company.

The City Council decided against an idea from staff to task the outside auditor with reviewing the city’s labor agreements. “To me, that’s policy,” Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy said. The city decides whether labor negotiations are correct or incorrect, she said, and that task should not go to an outside firm.

Meanwhile, the city is saving money by keeping the internal auditor position vacant. The city’s internal auditor position has been vacant since May 20, when former auditor Marty Kolkin left the post for a new job in Santa Monica. Patti Bisharat, the city’s director of governmental affairs, told the City Council Tuesday that the internal auditor position may not be filled until January 2010 or later.

The city will have saved $100,000 by delaying the hiring of the internal auditor until December, according to Bisharat. The city still plans to hire an internal auditor.

When the city fills the internal auditor position, the auditor will report to the City Council instead of the city manager. Councilmembers in April said the internal auditor’s office could work in a more transparent way if it was supervised by the City Council. Because the city is changing the way the internal auditor’s office is supervised, the city needs to set up new ordinances, according to the city manager’s office.

Apart from thanking city staffers, city officials and councilmembers, Johnson did not make any comments about the outside auditor topic at Tuesday’s meeting.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 2, 2009 | 3:35 AM
I do not oppose an operational review, but the origin of this proposal was made by Johnson's front organization very covertly with no buy-in from our elected representatives, and is especially hypocritical coming from someone whose own organizational audits reveal immense financial anomalies, inadequate cashflows, and operational failure, especially considering the current investigations, Federal and otherwise, into the organization's possible obstruction of prior investigations into its misuse of funds, mishandling of allegations of child sexual abuse, and a host of other issues. KJ couldn't withstand such an audit himself, yet he demands one of a far more competently run municipal government in a manner that is reminiscent of Newt Gingrich's impeachment challenges against Bill Clinton's dalliances, when Newt was guilty of the very same sort of thing... Let's hope hypocrisy will temper this 'review' and KJ's previously handpicked contractor (Alvarez and Martin) will not be among those seeking the job...
7 2
REPLY
September 2, 2009 | 7:38 PM
Community Development (formerly Development Services) and Economic Development need a thorough review and the auditor must review every single financial transaction in and out of the Merged Downtown Redevelopment fund. They're likely to turn up some interesting stuff.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background