STORYLINE City hall

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Dispensary moratorium extended

by Cheyenne Cary, published on August 25, 2009 at 8:45PM

Storyline: City hall

No high resolution image exists...

Loading images

During Tuesday night's hearing, the Sacramento City Council voted unanimously to extend the citywide moratorium on medical cannabis dispensary openings and expansion for ten months and fifteen days, totaling a year of halted development.

The city is now 42 days into the moratorium's original 45. In that time, city government has been collecting information on cannabis clubs and invited existing dispensaries to register themselves within 30 days, a time window that closed on August 16. The registration has ceased; the research has not.

"We felt that 45 days was just too short," said City Special Projects Manager Michelle Heppner, who helped conduct the fact-finding mission. "Things moved very slowly. We would call the city, leave a message, get a call back in two days from the wrong person, it was hectic."

As outlined in the original moratorium, new cannabis clubs will be prevented from opening and existing clubs will be unable to physically expand their operations. There is no limitation on the number of patients a dispensary serves, however.

Cannabis club co-owner Lanette Davies spoke on behalf of the dispensary community and voiced her support for setting standards on practices.

American Association for Medical Cannabis state director and longtime medical cannabis activist Ryan Landers also spoke briefly, reminding the City Council of the seriousness of medical marijuana. "It saves people's lives, helps them keep medicine down, makes people eat. Cannabis is vital."

About 40 cannabis dispensaries registered with the city, a number that almost doubled the city's previous estimates. Those that did not register in the 30 day period will not be excluded from considerations, Heppner said. Registration consisted of providing basic information that proved the dispensary in question was open before June 15, but did not probe any further into the structure and practices of the businesses.

"We don't really know what [the clubs] do," Heppner said, "but that will be coming later when we consider regulations. That'll be the interesting part."

In the next few weeks and months, the research task force will communicate with dispensaries, compare regulatory options with other California cities and hold public meetings to invite comment. Current plans include an as-yet unscheduled meeting in late September and a law enforcement tour of Oakland dispensaries.

The moratorium will expire on July 13, 2010 unless it is further extended. Under city code, emergency ordinances can last up to two years.

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.

August 26, 2009 | 08:57 AM
"We felt that 45 days was just too short," said City Special Projects Manager Michelle Heppner, who helped conduct the fact-finding mission. "Things moved very slowly. We would call the city, leave a message, get a call back in two days from the wrong person, it was hectic."

If Ms. Heppner finds things moving slowly then maybe she should step it up. Is she really that incompetent? No suspect she is moving slowly on pupoose - that would make her disingenuous and narrow minded not lazy. But maybe she's all three. More bs from 915 I Street.
0 2
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 11:08 AM
Perhaps she is stoned?
1 1
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 02:36 PM
Everybody Must Get Stoned! Man, that would be a good song title.
0 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 10:42 PM
Dude, it does take more than 45 days to write a good marijuana law. If we move too fast, we will get a bad law that will not work for the patients. I have worked on many of these laws for our side and there is a hell of a lot to.
Why would you call her "Disingenuous, Narrow Minded, and Lazy or all 3?!?!?!!?!?!?!
That is a horrible thing to say this about the person, who was just assigned the job to look into something she which she knows nothing about. Markes, your comment is narrow-minded! At least we are trying. Were you there testifying to try and help with the facts and process?? I did help and will continue to help patients fight for their rights and needs! It is Real Easy to sit behind your computer and BITCH about someone who is trying to do something. There are too many issues and considerations to write a law and cretin public hearings, which you are required to hold by law? And its her fault that other cities take too long to return calls and have the wrong person return the call??? How the hell could that be her fault. Instead of Bitching and Complaining about something you know nothing about, why don't you get involved and learn and try to help??
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
TYPE YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW
EDIT YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW cancel edit

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Forgot Password?
New Users Create an Account Here
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com