STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Mayor's education report praises charter schools

by Kathleen Haley, published on August 24, 2009 at 8:26 PM

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Mayor Kevin Johnson issued numerous draft recommendations Monday for improvements to Sacramento’s education system. They included evaluating schools with letter grades and setting up new educational programs and schools.

The recommendations come out of the Mayor’s Education Summit, which was held in Sacramento in March and featured education figures such as New York City Schools Chancellor Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee, chancellor of public schools in Washington, D.C. The ideas expressed in the draft white paper also include input from local educators, parents and citizens.

“What we wanted to do with the white paper is to create a dialogue,” Johnson told reporters at a press conference with state and local education leaders at Valley High School in Sacramento. He said he did not have a set timeline for implementing the recommendations.

The draft white paper includes an idea to stress accountability by rating schools with A-F letter grades. The idea comes from the grading program being used at New York City schools. “These report cards provide a mechanism through which parents and community members can make decisions and determinations for their children based on consistent, clear and objective data,” the white paper notes.

The paper points out that the community would need to analyze the idea in order to figure out how a grading system could work in Sacramento schools. The recommendation would in part start a “community conversation to develop the components of a school and district report card.”

The recommendations also address charter schools, as well as other specialized programs at schools. One of the recommendations states that the city could contact “educational management organizations that have seen success across the state and nation to open schools in Sacramento or partner in turning around low-performing schools.”

Johnson also announced at the Monday press conference that U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan will make a presentation on education in Sacramento on Sept. 3. The city will hold a town hall meeting at which Duncan will speak. Also on Sept. 3, Duncan will meet with state leaders during his trip to Sacramento, Johnson said.

Read the entire white paper here

Photos by staff reporter Jonathan Mendick.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 25, 2009 | 8:11 AM
Nice story Kathleen. Shamefully, the Bee failed to cover this story so on this topic, you are the key source of information. What is also good to mention is that the U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan will be coming to Sacramento on Thursday, September 3 at Mayor Johnson's request. Duncan will headline an education town hall.
2 0
REPLY
edited on  August 25, 2009 | 10:36 AM
I'm not surprised a summit created by and for charter school proponents winds up praising charter schools.

Wow, this is scary. Johnson and his pro-charter friends are planning on taking over Sacramento schools. Johnson's girlfriend, Michelle Rhee, is helping Johnson use DC Mayor Fenty's script for how to take over schools. Rule #1, you have to be a strong mayor. He's laid out his plan. He's vying for our schools which is an absolutely frightening prospect. I have felt Johnson's sudden interest in city politics and his very immediate push for a strong mayor were indicitive of his desire to take over schools. That's Johnson's passion and agenda. He needs the strong mayorship to achieve this. It isn't about the city and it's needs. Johnson wants to be education king. YIKES!

5 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 9:45 AM
Be afraid, be very afraid. Glad I transferred my daughter out of a SCUSD high school to a San Juan high school last June. I'm sure all the mayor's Republican friends will be out in front of his push to charterize as many schools as possible. That's where the last pot of relatively untouched Federal and state dollars can be exploited for private corporations.
4 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 12:55 PM
Get the government out of the education business.
0 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 3:34 PM
Yeah and get the Government out of Medicare while you're at it!
0 0
REPLY
August 27, 2009 | 8:41 AM
I agree.
0 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 1:02 PM
Who is going to grade Sac Charter High on how it is serving at-risk students? Over and over I hear reports that kids at Sac Charter who fail the exit exam or are credit deficient are counseled out and sent to district schools. It's model is that school is for college bound kids only. This was even stated publicly is the Bee. Rick Maya, former Executive director, discussed Sac Charter's desire to recruit district wide because many of their students end up there "by default'. In other words, the neighborhood kids who thought that the high school around the corner from their house ought to teach all children, not just those it chooses to teach. it's low enrollment and outstanding debts show that in reality it is a model for failure. Kevin Johnson has no business setting himself up as an education reformer. His education reform is to cherry pick the kids and let the rest be damned.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  August 26, 2009 | 3:37 PM
What if those kids are really good at playing basketball. Well then they grow up to be mayors, obviously.
0 1
REPLY
edited on  August 26, 2009 | 11:50 AM
Kevin Johnson and the SCUSD (and enablers at the Bee) get a big fat "F"

For continuing the pretense that central Sacramento does not need its historic, TRULY public, comprehensive high school;
For failing to provide the central city and East Sacramento with a court-ordered comprehensive high school;
For refusing to return the Sacramento High School campus to the community that it once served, under that court order;
For underutilizing the valuable and historic resource that the Sacramento High School (the real "Sac High") campus provides;
For propping up the underperforming St. HOPE squatting on the Sac High campus;
For selling out the education of public school students for a self-serving springboard to political power and private gain;
For misuse of Federal funds, for allegations and investigations, for payoffs, for intimidating and shaming the girls who complained about sexual harassment, into silence and invisibility;
For SQUANDERING the valuable, community building resource that the real, diverse, TRULY public, historic Sacramento High School once was;
For demonizing the people who pay for Sacramento High School with their tax dollars, who have a court order and still no comprehensive high school;
For accusing those who understand the value of a diverse community educational experience, of being "elitists."
For pretending that charter schools are public schools;.
For undermining the public school system with all of the above;
For planning to privatize our public school system.
4 3
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 9:03 AM
WOW! Marion, you have hit the nail on the head with this one. You are obviously well-informed about the high school situation for the inner city and east area neighborhoods. If only the rest of the populace would take notice of the sham, tax-payer rip-off that is St. HOPE.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  August 26, 2009 | 11:49 AM
Who and when was it decided that the core central city neighborhoods, from Mid/Downtown, McKinley Park, East Sac, River Park, College Greens, etc. (all neighborhoods north of Broadway) do not need a comprehensive high school for their neighborhood schools to feed into?

The court decided that they do. Where is it?

Is that crazy? Is a historic and traditional educational (andn community building) experience (and valuable resource, funded by taxpayers who don't get to use it) supposed to disappear and that's it?

Is the "F" failure, mentioned above, PAYBACK or punitive for the many Sacramento High School public school students and families NOT choosing the Faux "Sac High," commanded and controlled by Kevin Johnson and St. HOPE? Or do Johnson and the SCUSD really not CARE where all those students, from the second oldest high school west of the Mississippi, from the core city neighborhoods, drift away to?

Sustainability? All those kids could bike or walk or bus to the historic Sacramento High School. Where are they going now? How are they getting there?

Why is the Sacramento public being treated like this elephant in the room does not exist? How does someone who has done this to the community use it as a springboard for political office, become mayor and then claim to care about education in the community? The untold story of the treachers and staff who believed in Sacramento Charter High School and tried to work with Kevin Johnson is as vital as the untold story of the girls who were sexiually harassed and intimidated into silence.

Your comment and warning above is spot on. Sacramentans had better start paying attention to this sooner rather than later. If they are lackadaisical about privatization of public schools, it will happen without anyone asking THEM about it. Is that the community Sacramento wants to become? Michelle Rhee is a steamroller. If Kevin becomes her "strong mayor," she will not be taking polls and doing meet and greets. She will push her agenda, no questions asked, like she has in Washington, D.C..

"Michelle Rhee, is helping Johnson use DC Mayor Fenty's script for how to take over schools. Rule #1, you have to be a strong mayor. He's laid out his plan. He's vying for our schools which is an absolutely frightening prospect. I have felt Johnson's sudden interest in city politics and his very immediate push for a strong mayor were indicitive of his desire to take over schools. That's Johnson's passion and agenda. He needs the strong mayorship to achieve this. It isn't about the city and it's needs. Johnson wants to be education king. YIKES! "
3 1
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 1:57 PM
Where will the Sep 3 town hall meeting be held and is the public invited?
0 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 2:53 PM
Hi Priscilla,

Thanks for your question. The Sept. 3 town hall meeting will be held in the Tsakopoulos room at the Central Library at 828 I Street. Joaquin McPeek, Johnson's spokesman, said the city hasn't yet finalized whether the event will be open to the public.

Cheers,
Kathleen
0 0
REPLY
edited on  August 25, 2009 | 3:27 PM
A "town hall meeting" that isn't open to the town is a charade at best.
4 0
REPLY
edited on  August 25, 2009 | 4:23 PM
Ah but you see William, when "charter" = "public," "staff" = "volunteers" and "transparency" = "secrecy," a "Town Hall Meeting" is not necessarily open to the public. It's held in a "town hall" and it's a "meeting," right? What more do you want? Just like charter schools are "public schools" because the public is allowed to attend them!

See how much more smoothly things run when language is malleable, meaning is arbitrary and accountability is code for "more unchecked power"?


5 1
REPLY
edited on  August 25, 2009 | 10:51 PM
IF the "Town Hall Meeting" is anything like his ed summit, it will be by invitation only. That way, there's no dissention and a perception of overwhelming support. It's all about controlling the outcome.
3 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 1:17 PM
Hey now Marion, "transparency" has always meant the same thing as "invisibility."
0 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 3:16 PM
I love these observations, Marion. Informed and applicable.
0 1
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 3:17 PM
Oh that's right. Thanks William. Silly me. Clear as a bell.
0 1
REPLY
August 29, 2009 | 3:25 PM
Hey Marion and Wiliam, get a room!
0 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 6:21 PM
Interesting parallel "event" today was Jonathan Raymond's (SCUSD new superintendent) first public meet and greet at C.K. McClatchy High School (by public I mean parents, caregivers, students, community members, teachers...). As testiment to the investment Sacramento city families have in their neighborhood schools, the McClatchy library was filled to standing-room- only capacity at 8 am! Mr. Raymond spoke about his background and early thinking just three days on the job, then opened the floor to questions, concerns and general thoughts from the audience. Interestingly enough, not one audience member spoke in support of more charters or third-party educational management companies-- in fact the only time charter schools came up was when Mr. Raymond raised the issue and several audience members eventually spoke in concern over Sacramento Charter High and the divisiveness it continues to sow in this city six years after Sac High was handed over to St. Hope.
3 0
REPLY
August 25, 2009 | 7:59 PM
"Sacramento Charter High and the divisiveness it continues to sow in this city six years after Sac High was handed over to St. Hope." At the same location Sacramento High School historically sowed seeds of community in our uniquely diverse city.
3 2
REPLY
NAS
Author thumbnail
August 26, 2009 | 10:13 AM
Help. We are trying to decide whether to enroll our student in 2nd grade at a district elementary school or a charter school. We are given very little information about the charter school. Oh dear, I just realized I am actually talking about a school in San Juan District. If anyone has any information regarding Aspire Elementary school (a charter) please email ASAP. The school opens for its first year on Monday. The neighborhood school he would attend is Whitney. Hard to tell from the outside which school would best challenge my student. Please help us.
Thank you,
Nancy Sternberg
starmtn@pacbell.net
0 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 2:35 PM
If Kevin Johnson's charter school, Sacramento Charter High is an example of a good performing school, then we are all in trouble. Charter schools are popular because when Bush instituted the NCLB act and created standards and achievements he forgot to support this with any money to help the schools and teachers attain and sustain these unattainable goals. it's fine and dandy to have standards but you need to put your money where your mouth is. Independent charters, such as Sac Charter High get around the "legality" of standards by self-reporting and cherry picking their students. Most students who can't cut it are "counseled out" in the spring ending up at McClatchy, Johnson, Rosemont and any other school that will accept them. Kevin Johnson is pulling the wool over everyones eyes when he says his school is successful. An example, they graduated 194 seniors this year and the school lost 190 students to transfers. Is that successful?
1 0
REPLY
August 26, 2009 | 3:26 PM
I just want to express my thanks to those who comment here who see through this mayor's empty-suited attributions to the charterization of PUBLIC schools, and the efforts of his Republican friends and backers to gut what's left of PUBLIC instruction under the ruse that led to the whole St. Hope debacle and its impending bankruptcy..... THERE'S MORE TO COME....
2 1
REPLY
August 27, 2009 | 9:05 PM
The empty suits count on empty heads.
2 1
REPLY
August 29, 2009 | 3:29 PM
Wow, you are so smart!
1 0
REPLY
November 13, 2009 | 10:50 AM
It sounds like there is a lot of frustration about the educational offering in the Sac City School District. So I'm frankly surprised by the animosity towards charter public schools. California's charter law offers parents, community leaders, and educators an opportunity to make real changes in public education--right now. Don’t have to wait for politicians to fix the problem: You start a charter school in 12-24 months and make a real difference in the community.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background