STORYLINE Downtown

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Benches at I Street Central Library removed

by Kathleen Haley, published on August 7, 2009 at 6:49 PM

Storyline: Downtown RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

If you go to Sacramento’s Central Library, you’ll see that the I Street sidewalk looks empty. That’s because all the benches are gone.

A library official said the benches were removed in part because they were obstructing the area for disabled patrons. But an advocate for the city’s homeless population disagrees, and thinks the benches were removed because homeless people used them for resting.

All the benches -- there were more than 15 -- were taken away from the library’s sidewalk, according to Don Tucker, director of facilities for the Sacramento Public Library. The city’s Parks and Recreation Department will refinish the old benches and place them in various locations in Sacramento, he said.

Two new benches will arrive at the I Street sidewalk adjacent to the library in two or three weeks. If the library finds that its customers need more than two benches, the library will add more benches, Tucker noted.

The library was receiving feedback from disabled patrons and mothers with babies in strollers that the benches were blocking access to the library, Tucker said. Removing the benches “helps to provide access,” he added.

The library also conducted a survey on the benches about a year-and-a-half ago, according to Tucker. It showed that only 7 percent of the people using the benches were library customers, he said.

“What that told was that we had too many [benches] out here,” Tucker said.

The removal of the benches, and the upcoming replacement of two of them, is part of a beautification effort at the library’s I Street entrance, Tucker explained.

Removing the benches has lead to an increase in the number of bicyclists because it is now easier to access the bicycle racks on I Street, he said. “We’re noting a lot more bikes and bikers using the library, which we’re very pleased about,” Tucker said.

The library did not receive complaints about homeless people on the benches, he said.

Library officials were assured by the Downtown Sacramento Partnership that there were an adequate number of new benches and tables at Cesar Chavez Park for people who used the I Street benches but were not library customers, Tucker said.

But Garren Bratcher, co-director of Loaves & Fishes, said he thinks the reason for the removal of the benches was because homeless people used them.

“It is my belief that they were removed because homeless people use them to rest,” Bratcher said. “Having been at the public library at its peak hours, I’ve never seen any accessibility problems.”

Photos by David Watts Barton

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 7, 2009 | 10:27 PM
This is all about making it so the homeless can't camp out front all day. Why can't the library just be honest about their true goal here? I think it's a good idea myself, now Cesar Chavez Park will have a few more bums living there during the day than before.
2 0
REPLY
October 22, 2009 | 12:56 PM
Look Library's have no CUSTOMERS. People who use Public Library's are patrons.
Everyone pays the tax that supports the Libraries benches and that tax is Sales Tax.
You will find it on your receipt for fast food or soda pop.

There might have been too many benches, however surveys are not done without interaction with people. Just because people are homeless does not make them not current card carrying members/patrons.

You will have a hard time running me out of the library. I may be homeless, but I am a citizen and all citizens have the same rights.

In fact I bet the fact I go to college as well as use the library really gets you.

Thats because you and people like you feel that all homeless people are junkies and thieves.

Well to attribute, I have been homeless since I was 17 years old. I have no felonies on my record.
I have a 3.79 Grade point average as I am currently attending, in a Bachelors of Science in Information Technology.

So don't call me a bum, I don't ask for your spare change, I will ask for respect and social change.

0 0
REPLY
August 7, 2009 | 11:06 PM
I'm glad they did it. Accessing the bike racks has been an issue for myself and my family. Also, the smells coming from those benches were pretty horrendous, and if they weren't going to be able to keep the benches free from pigeon droppings, vomit, and other matter then it is best to be rid of them.
1 0
REPLY
August 7, 2009 | 11:26 PM
Making public spaces less comfortable for the homeless also ends up making those public spaces less comfortable for everyone else. Homeless people on public benches is just a symptom of a larger problem--the issue of homelessness. Taking away the benches doesn't cure that problem, it just masks the symptom, and makes the public space less useful for everyone.
3 3
REPLY
August 8, 2009 | 12:14 AM
it's about the homeless - why can't they just be honest about it. We close the public restrooms in the parks and take benches away on public sidewalks - taking away the last semblance of any dignity for human beings who happen to be homeless. Good way to treat other human beings. Ceaser Chavez will have more people as well as private property around downtown - it's totally pathetic - we need to deal with the real problem not act like it doesn't exist.
2 2
REPLY
edited on  August 8, 2009 | 12:28 AM
Nonsense.

When the new library was built, the powers that be made sure the homeless couldn't get INSIDE.

Now, they're not supposed to exist OUTSIDE, either.

Congratulations.
2 3
REPLY
August 8, 2009 | 9:49 AM
If it's any sort of a saving grace, the powers that be have failed to keep the homeless from going inside. I'm in that library a lot and I see a lot of street folks I know hanging out, especially when it gets cold. Some are just staying out of the weather rather than patronizing the library, but some do check out books or use the Internet--one feature of being homeless is that you have a lot of unplanned time for things like reading.
2 0
REPLY
August 8, 2009 | 12:02 PM
“Having been at the public library at its peak hours, I’ve never seen any accessibility problems.”

Perhaps because he CAN see - things like benches on sidewalks are an obstacle course for the blind, as are things like visually appealing landscaping strips with curved detours around trees.
0 0
REPLY
August 8, 2009 | 7:30 PM
When did we decide that public benches are solely for the use of the homeless? I have a home AND I would like to see more public benches in midtown. It would be nice to have a place to sit and relax. There are times when I have to sit on a curb or on a wall; then I start to feel like a vagabond myself.
1 0
REPLY
August 8, 2009 | 9:40 PM
I never had any trouble parking my bike at the library except when the racks were full. More racks are needed, also at downtown plaza. And I doubt that homeless people enjoy being smelly any more than anyone else.
0 0
REPLY
August 10, 2009 | 8:39 AM
MORE benches, MORE places to sit outside are a good thing for everybody. I cannot see how bicycles racks were blocked or that disabled people were blocked or discomfitted before the benches were removed.

I would like to see the library's bench survey; I doubt it was a serious scientific effort.
1 0
REPLY
August 10, 2009 | 2:08 PM
The public library serves specific purpose and it's not as a day care facility for the home-less. It's nonsense to suggest that "the powers that be made sure the homeless couldn't get inside" -because they do hang out inside -mostly sleeping and using the bathroom. Marion, the public library was NOT created for that purpose nor are they supposed to use the benches to day-camp, in-mass. William b. the benches were so overran by dirty, stinky people (sorry it's just a fact) and their multiple bags that home'd seldom felt comfortable using them -as the survey pointed out only 7 % of library patrons used them. The library is not about fixing all the social ills. If this is going to a real city it's going to have function. I'm thrilled they are gone!

1 1
REPLY
August 10, 2009 | 10:06 PM
Because, of course, in cities like San Francisco or New York, there are no homeless.
0 1
REPLY
August 10, 2009 | 9:57 PM
the benches were for everyone - i used them at times to hang out waiting for friends or yes even eating lunch - agree with a previous comment that we need even more benches not less -it's just more uncomfortable for everyone - i guess i'm just sick of being lied to as to the real reason they were removed.
1 0
REPLY
August 15, 2009 | 11:28 PM
W.B. Ok so you are refering to my "If this is going to a real city it's going to have function" comment... well I should have said IF we are going to be a functioning city we need to get real.

And savemidtown (from what I don't know) I always use the library and never used the benches because 1) I take a shower and put on cologne in the morning for a reason. 2) I don't need to control my appetite. 3) If I'm going to sit outside I want it to be a pleasurable experience - I enjoy fresh air.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background