STORYLINE Police / Public Safety

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

E-mails reveal city's talks on security cameras

by Kathleen Haley, published on July 30, 2009 at 10:40 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Photo: Mayor Kevin Johnson has mentioned K Street and Regional Transit stations as possible locations for new surveillance cameras.

The Sacramento Police Department and Mayor Kevin Johnson’s office anticipated a battle with the local branch of the American Civil Liberties Union over the city's plans to buy 32 surveillance cameras, e-mails show.

The debate between the Sacramento County chapter of the ACLU and the Sacramento Police Department over the effectiveness of surveillance cameras is revealed in documents obtained by The Sacramento Press.

The ACLU argues that surveillance cameras do not cut crime. Norm Leong, spokesman for the police department, said that security cameras already help the police department to combat crime.

The locations for the cameras have not yet been selected, and the money has not yet been received by the police department, Leong said. The cameras and other related equipment would be paid for with a $615,000 grant from the Homeland Security Administration.

In May 19 and June 1 e-mail messages between police department managers and staffers at the offices of Mayor Kevin Johnson and City Councilman Rob Fong, Capt. Ken Bernard of the Sacramento Police Department alerted officials about the ACLU’s concerns.

“This is a heads up regarding the camera grant," Bernard wrote. "The ACLU is going to be fighting us accepting the grant, so I thought we should all be prepared to address potential council concerns.”

Bernard then addressed Chief Rick Braziel in the e-mail message: “Chief--it appears that the mayor may be trying to get you involved in a conference call to address the ACLU’s concerns.”

In the e-mail, Bernard also asked whether the city had conducted research on the effectiveness of surveillance cameras.

“Has anyone involved in the writing of the grant done any research as to their effectiveness?” he wrote. “Might be nice if can quote some stats or have some talking points to counter the ACLU’s position. Thoughts?”

*Photo by Sacramento Press staff reporter Suzanne Hurt.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 31, 2009 | 12:00 AM
Great information. Kathleen, I assume you were able to obtain these emails using the Public Records Act?
1 0
REPLY
edited on  July 31, 2009 | 2:44 PM
Thanks, Bill. I regularly use the Calif. Public Records Act, but I didn't need to this time. For this story, I called Matthew Ruyak, a supervising deputy city attorney. He sent me the e-mails and other documents related to the surveillance program. I want to post the e-mails, but I learned yesterday that they can't be posted because they're password-protected. I asked Mr. Ruyak today to send me the documents in a version that is not password-protected.

Cheers,
Kathleen
1 0
REPLY
July 31, 2009 | 12:25 PM
I agree, great insight into the thought processes going on behind this!
1 0
REPLY
July 31, 2009 | 1:36 PM
Three reasons why cameras are a bad idea- 1. It is proven by more than one study that cameras do not deter crime. 2. Cameras are rarely instrumental in convictions. 3. Our existing cameras are so poorly configured and secured, they can be used by criminals to determine what are safe areas for them to commit crimes in or be used in escaping from police, if they were so inclined.

That, and the grant only covers installing the cameras. It does not cover paying for staff to maintain and secure them, much less review footage or investigate potential crimes. Since money will have to be spent on headcount somewhere that comes from inside the city, I would rather it be spent on more investigators than on camera babysitters.
1 0
REPLY
July 31, 2009 | 6:23 PM
They need to have RT staff checking to see if riders have paid at a couple of key downtown light rail stops. That will do more to clean up the area than any cameras.

Doe anybody honestly think those gang-bangers riding light rail at all times of the day and night have paid their fares? Maybe they are using their student passes when they are riding the rails during the school day.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background