STORYLINE Street Philosophy

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

In search of sleep

by Hawa Arsala, published on July 1, 2009 at 10:40 PM

Storyline: Street Philosophy RSS Feed

1 of 5
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 5
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Emergency overflow shelters shut down their accommodations to the homeless in Sacramento, including Cal Expo so the homeless took a stand Wednesday morning.

Hundreds gathered in front of Loaves & Fishes on the corner of North 12th and Ahern Street for a march to bring awareness to the recent closings of shelters and the criminalization of poverty and homelessness.

Event organizers expected around 200 attendees, but at one point during the march, there were counts of close to 1,000 people walking to 420 Richards Blvd., a vacant parcel next to the new police station.

Many of those participating in the rally who rely on shelters for a place to sleep at night said they are afraid of legal consequences for camping out on streets.

"There was a woman, six months pregnant on the street, and when the police found she was homeless, they put her in jail," said G.P. Bailey, an activist and songwriter. "That is a scary thing."

"It's a crime against people for existing," said Robert, an 18-year-old a recent graduate of Jesuit High School.

He endured the heat and 1.2-mile march in solidarity for the community of people he was immersed in as a part of a community service project. Robert spent one week living as a homeless person, scrounging for food and pedaling for money with the guidance of teachers.

"We come from a pretty privileged school and they want us to learn that there is more to life than that cloistered area in Carmichael," he said.

Another appearance from the ranks of the privileged was made by the lead singer of local band Papa Roach, Jacoby Shaddix, who lived in Del Paso Heights since the age of 18.

He mingled with the rally participants, held up signs of support with his family, and led a cheer for a safe, legalized camping ground for the homeless.

"My family was homeless for the first year of my life, and to be where I'm at now, I'm super blessed," he said.

Papa Roach has donated money to Loaves & Fishes, and when he is not touring on the road, he serves food there in his spare time.

Birte, a librarian at Loaves & Fishes, as well as a Danish immigrant, was attracted to the homeless environment because of her experiences in Denmark.

"Healthcare for everyone was a big difference back home," she said. "A lot of folks out here end up here because they didn't have healthcare or had big bills."

Tina Reynolds, the owner of Uptown Studios, expressed the need to reform public policy that criminalizes homelessness.

"We are working on repealing laws and making politicians aware of the situation," she said. She also expressed dissatisfaction with the various laws that prevent people from setting up camping gear, rolled up beds, and how these apply to everyone with homes as well. "You are not allowed to camp out in your backyard for more than one day," Reynolds said.

The issues at hand are not specific to the homeless population, they also affect the community in general.

"It's not one side, it's affecting everyone," G.P. Bailey.

Bailey feels the cuts in shelters are creating a ripple effect which affects more than those looking for a home on the street.

"It is affecting the police department," he said. "It's hard to hire anyone from the new graduating class" of the police academy.

Reynolds suggested a dome-like model structure on display from World Shelters that they hope to implement in the future.

"They have if for disaster relief, and there's no disaster like homelessness," she said.

The structure, which costs roughly $2,495, is made of panels of corrugated plastic, and is said to protect from UV rays and can be equipped with optional solar panel attachments. For $2 a day, people can live in these structures.

Reynolds said she wants to look for property within the city that is unclaimed and hopefully set up safe facilities. She described the ideal location as an inexpensive community off the grid that has access to services like Loaves & Fishes, water, toilets, showers and garbage collection.

"What I hope is that we'll be able to understand that there's a legitimate problem in Sacramento," Robert said.

 

To learn more, click the following links:
Sacramento Loaves & Fishes
World Shelters

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 1, 2009 | 10:53 PM
Tent cities are not the answer. The city and county need to fully fund low income housing units with on-site supportive care. People who advocate for tent cities should be ashamed of themselves.
1 1
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 11:03 PM
Who will pay for these fully fund low income housing units with on-site supportive care? The city and county are millions $$$ in debt. Services are being cut while fees are going up on those who do pay taxes, I really don't know what can be done at this point.
4 0
REPLY
July 16, 2009 | 5:20 PM
I think that you need to have more information. If you went out there and gave some of your time to HELP others that are less forturnate than you, it might open your eyes to a problem that is sneaking up on a lot more folks. If you are sleeping in your cool home tonight, taking a shower in the morning then you probable have a job. These people with unemployment at close to 11%, (the highest its been since the end of WW2) have been displaced from their homes because they are UNABLE to pay for basic housing. They are unable to look for a job, as whereever they go, their belongings must come with them. If you have never been homeless, then you need to talk to those that are. Most of these people are your friends and neighbors. Help out at Loaves and Fishes, then make up your own mind.
0 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 11:25 PM
You are both right, and I appreciate your responses. Tent cities are hard to maintain because they are hastily put together in the face of unforeseen or sudden circumstances. Sanitation is also definitely an issue.

What the advocates at this rally want is not a tent city, but a well thought out periphery-community to provide basic human necessities to those who rely on shelters. It was mentioned that these communities may be able to prevent homeless people from being incarcerated. It is easy for this to happen when you want to illegally set up camp on the street. With a quasi-community set up on a vacant lot, along with plans to have sanitation and an orderly governed system, it can prevent constant incarceration.

I really like your idea about on-site supportive care, TomRunge. Actually, most shelters in the Sacramento area already support rehabilitation efforts through therapy in addition to providing shelter. I hope I was able to give some insight!

And yes, to erect low income housing in the state's current financial situation seems like a fantasy. I was just listening to the 11pm news, and it is pretty devastating. It is hard to figure out what our priorities are in a time like this, but we can be aware of our environment and community.
0 3
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:10 AM
Most shelters do a pretty poor job of rehabilitation. There are exceptions, in the case of some transitional programs, but most shelter programs are just human warehouses. Models like "housing first" provide housing in conjunction with case management, but in these tough fiscal times it's tough to justify the expenditure, even though they can save money in the long run.
0 1
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 11:28 PM
It is more cost effective to house the homeless in simple units with on-site support than it is to continuously cycle them through the public health and criminal justice systems. There was a study in San Francisco that showed the cost of supportive housing was 20K per year. The cost for people living on the street was 85K. That was in the late 1990's.

The rally today will do absolutely nothing to help solve the homeless problem in Sacramento. It just gives those involved a chance to let everyone know how empathetic they are. If folks were really interested in helping the homeless, they would be marching to city hall and the county board of supervisors meetings and demanding that they fund housing units for the homeless.
2 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:13 AM
I wouldn't say that rallies don't help at all--at the very least they raise awareness, spread the issue, and help educate and encourage people to actually go to city hall and the county board of supervisors and advocate for inclusionary housing, protest the destruction of affordable housing, and advocate for better supportive services (and yes, I do those things, in addition to grumbling about them on the Internet.) A lot of the folks involved in this sort of event do turn up at City Hall, set up appointments with county supervisors and city council members, and beat the drum to get the folks who learned about the issue at public events like this to show up in mass numbers for important local government decisions.
1 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 7:53 AM
Tom, I agree with what you said in that first paragraph, and that is what the activists are hoping to avoid--the continuous cycle through the criminal justice system. Well said. Facilities at Cal Expo cost roughly $140,000 a month to run, and though subsidized, I agree there needs to be a more cost-effective alternative. They say the World Shelters can do that.

There is some phone bank type of activity and writing of letters to local officials going on in this process, because as you mentioned, that is how to get help.

The processes to set up low-income, supportive housing could take years. This is a temporary solution to providing shelter and being aware of the issue helps stir more activism in the community. Thank you for raising some great concerns!

Also, I should add that St. John's Shelter for women and children on Power Inn Road has approximately 340 people on the wait list for entry. This is a program that provides a lot of rehabilitation efforts as well: http://www.stjohnsshelter.org/program.php
0 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 8:22 AM
....."criminalization of poverty and homelessness". What law is that?Where can I find it? I have been poor for many years of my life and never been arrested. Somethign must be different?
4 0
REPLY
edited on  July 2, 2009 | 11:00 AM
Camping on public or private property in Sacramento is illegal, it was declared so back in 1995. So if you are homeless and unable to get into a shelter, literally going to sleep is illegal, because there is literally no place in the city limits that is not either public or private property.
1 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:05 AM
Thank you William Burg! As Tina Reynolds is quoted saying in the article, you can't even camp our in your own backyard for more than one night. It is illegal! Clearly there are some wonky policies here.
1 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 9:44 AM
Many organizers spoke on the issues of arresting homeless people because of illegal camping on streets. They cannot afford housing and end up sleeping outdoors with blankets, sleeping bags, etc. By law, this is illegal to do.

Also, "criminalization" does not necessarily culminate in an arrest of some sort. It can also apply to a social view as well.

Thank you very much for raising that issue, I appreciate it!
0 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 10:15 AM
So likely someone was not arrested for being poor,but being arrested for breaking the law, thanks for the clarification. And also thanks for the pointing out that commiting crimes do not always equate to an arrest.. Pity. (Social view sounds a bit squishy for opinion, but thats just my social view).
2 0
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 10:26 AM
Yes, no arrest for being poor!

"Criminalization" does not mean the act of committing a crime, but to treat as criminal. Some people are socialized to think that all homeless people are criminals, when in fact they may not be. So this is a situation where a criminalized homeless person (one who is labeled a criminal via social views) is not in a position of arrest. I hope that better clarifies what I was trying to say.

Thank you for sparking some great discussion here.
1 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:08 AM
Hawa, in this case, yes, homelessness is criminalized. It is a ticketing offense rather than something people get arrested for, but it does go on an individual's criminal record, and the fine is obviously an economic hit for people who are the least able to afford it.

Public camping is illegal in Sacramento--but all that means is sleeping. It doesn't require a campground or a tent. Generally the police won't ticket someone who isn't obviously homeless taking a nap at a public park, but they can and do issue public camping tickets to people sleeping on park benches or stairs. Sleep is necessary for human survival--nobody can survive without sleep! But the very act of sleep is illegal for homeless people.

Thanks for writing this article, keep up the good work.
0 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:29 AM
Thank you for making the distinction between a ticketing offense and arrest. Many of the people I spoke to told me they were arrested when found sleeping on sidewalks. Can there be a different scenario in which this happens?

I like how you said "the very act of sleep is illegal for homeless people." This hits really hard.

Thanks very much!
1 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:22 AM
Tent Cities are springing up across the country. It's not a problem that's going away anytime soon. We can know it will happen in a ramshackle way on random private property parcels, or we can provide a safe place with some (very little) structure. Please follow the link to a model tent city run by a Catholic Parish in St. Petersburg, FL. http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE55G01Z20090617 It has set plots, water, sanitation, bike racks and mailboxes. A place where instead of searching for a remote bed in the brush, people can get a good night's sleep, not worry that they will go to jail every second their eyes are closed, and be in touch with the services they need to get their lives together.
0 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:32 AM
Sounds like that's what they're trying to do here in Sacramento! Though they hope to be able to use the World Shelters as an alternative to tents.

Thanks for this link! It reminds us in Sacramento that we aren't the only "Tent City"
0 1
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:38 AM
The folks who participated in this rally have no intention of seeing the homeless housed. Having the homeless on the street gives them justification for using lame slogans like "don't criminalize the poor". They are more than happy to have the festering sore that is Loaves and Fishes do nothing but perpetuate the problem. They will never work to make sure that the homeless are properly housed and cared for because once the problem is solved they will no longer have any visual proof that justifies their belief that society is out to get the poor. They can just say, "Look at the conditions on Bercut Drive" and people will nod their head in agreement. Well, they are wrong. And using the homeless as human shields to justify their position is reprehensible.

Sacramento has decreased the number of chronic homeless by 35% between 2007-2009. This trend will continue as more permanent supportive housing units come online, like the Budget Inn on Stockton Blvd. If the folks in the article really wanted a solution, they would be demanding that our city and county government get these units open and operating immediately.
2 0
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:52 AM
Tom, do you have evidence of the sentiments of the participants that you cited in your first paragraph? If so, I would like to know.

Also, where are you getting the data about the decreased number of chronic homeless?

And again, it has been expressed that more permanent supportive housing is a goal for these people. However, in our current financial crisis, opening and operating these structures "immediately" seems like a long-shot. But it is what people want, and you make a great point in bringing that up!
0 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 12:12 PM
Please show proof of of one permanent housing unit that yesterday's action produced.

http://www.sacramentotoday.net/news/templates/community.asp?articleid=542&zoneid=1

http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/1345659.html
2 0
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 12:30 PM
Tom, I never claimed that this rally produced a permanent housing facility. I was able to prove, however, that this is what people want.

Thank you for providing the links for the articles. Sister Libby from Loaves & Fishes is quoted at the end of the article:

"I personally believe in 'housing first' because I work directly with homeless people with severe mental health, drug and alcohol issues," said Sister Libby Fernandez of Loaves and Fishes in Sacramento. "It's hard for change to occur unless you can change the environment. You have to get them into a safe place where they believe that their lives can get better."

It seems here that she advocates exactly what you advocate for.

With the closing of shelters this week, the number of homeless on the street is bound to go up. They say they are looking for an alternative for the time being. Thanks again for your sources.
0 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 11:56 AM
Access to housing and health services are the main reason I am supporting Safe Ground. You don't know a what the folks of this rally's intentions are -so stop saying you do. Affordable housing is the answer, but when people are jailed or scattered to the ends of the Earth, they can't get it together and get the help that they require to transition into housing. I support what you support, but I also support this.
1 2
REPLY
July 2, 2009 | 4:21 PM
Hawa: People can be arrested for public camping--it is an infraction. Often if there are active warrants for a person (such as a previous public camping ticket, or a light rail ticket, etc.) a ticketing can result in an arrest.

Tom's information about the decrease in chronic homeless comes from the city's homeless street count. We do have a "Housing First" program in Sacramento that has housed several hundred chronic homeless, the problem is that the demand far outstrips the supply. I don't agree with Tom's sentiments that L&F seeks to perpetuate homelessness to guarantee their own continued existence.

There is still a role for temporary homeless shelters and transitional housing--they are best suited to serve those who become temporarily homeless but still have the tools to get back on their feet (most folks who are homeless only remain on the street for a while.) "Housing first" addresses chronic homelessness--the folks who are on the street the longest, with the most problems.
0 1
REPLY
July 3, 2009 | 5:50 PM
Thanks for clearing that up!
0 0
REPLY
July 16, 2009 | 5:25 PM
think that you need to have more information. If you went out there and gave some of your time to HELP others that are less forturnate than you, it might open your eyes to a problem that is sneaking up on a lot more folks. If you are sleeping in your cool home tonight, taking a shower in the morning then you probable have a job. These people with unemployment at close to 11%, (the highest its been since the end of WW2) have been displaced from their homes because they are UNABLE to pay for basic housing. They are unable to look for a job, as where ever they go, their belongings must come with them. If you have never been homeless, then you need to talk to those that are. Most of these people are your friends and neighbors. Help out at Loaves and Fishes, then make up your own mind.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background